JB/096/105/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/096/105/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/105/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/105/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>DIVISION OF LAW &#x2014; All Laws penal</head>
 
<p>To this position however several <del>apparent exceptions may be <gap/></del> <add>classes of Laws may at first sight</add> seem to<lb/>
furnish so many exceptions.
<add>The</add> <del>First it may be asked, where is</del> <add>example alleged may be</add> that of a Law offering a bounty as <add>an</add><lb/>
encouragement to perform an act therein specified: such for instance <add>as</add><lb/>
the first made for <del>the</del> <add>that of the 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> of W. J. Moury ch. 2</add> to encourage the exportation of corn. And have it <add>is</add><lb/>
to be acknowledged that the primary motive created <add><sic>offer'd</sic></add> by the Law is a reward<lb/>
[which in this and similar instances it might well be considering 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi><lb/>
<note>supererogation</note> That the <add>measure which was the</add> <hi rend='underline'>object</hi> of the Law <sic>tho'</sic> expedient was not necessary to be obtained<lb/>
secondly; that the <del>persons who were the objects of it</del> <add>expence of the reward would only be</add> incurred in proportion <add>as</add><lb/>
the fund out of which it was to come should be increased; and thirdly<lb/>
that the persons to be rewarded were] <note>This is a note</note> But still <add>even here</add> <sic>it's</sic> effectuation <add>execution</add> <add>depends</add> <add>rests</add> <gap/><lb/>
ultimately upon punishment; for if <sic><hi rend='underline'>sombody</hi></sic> <del>are</del> is to receive, <add>some persons are permitted</add> others are <add>to <gap/></add><lb/>
pay; and the <del>obligation</del> <add>motive Sanction <sic>holden</sic> up to them</add> upon <add>to</add> them is <del>a</del> coercive <add>penal</add> <del>obligation</del> <del><add>our</add></del><lb/></p>
 
<pb/>
 
<p>Another may be that of a Law of which instances might be given + <note>+ In. an Instance</note><lb/>
<del>which <sic>permitts</sic></del> <add>made for the sole purpose of permitting</add> certain acts to be dome by certain persons <note>As for instance the prints Acts enabling persons to make Sales of Estates &amp;c.</note> &#x2014; but <del>what</del><lb/>
that permission <del>amount to without</del> <add>when examined meant no more than</add> a prohibition <sic>exprest</sic> or implied<lb/>
to all other persons from hindering them? and that prohibition <del>has</del> <add>must ever</add><lb/>
<add>have</add> some sanction to enforce it. which sanction <add>when nothing more is said</add> is the Costs of litigation.</p>


<p>After these <add>[stronger]</add> instances it is scarce necessary to mention that of <del>de</del> <add>distributive</add><lb/>
Laws in general where the <add>only</add> costs <del>for</del> <add>are</add> as <del><gap/></del> a <del>Sanction</del> <add>Penalty which is</add> not the less <unclear>real</unclear><lb/>
for not being particularly specified: or that of certain ancient Acts <del>pass</del> <add>of</add><lb/>
date when the <add>untutored</add> simplicity of Legislators had not yet learnt the expediency of<lb/>
restrictive specifications, <add>to</add> which though they wear the pose of a prohibition, <add>no</add><lb/>
particular Sanction is annexed &#x2014; The indefinite plenitude of the kingly<lb/>
authority <add>was trusted to as</add> [afforded] a fund of <add><gap/></add> sanctions. <note>L Colne <gap/> <add>says</add> &#x2014; Fine &amp; Imprisonment was the penalty when none was particularly specified. In <del><gap/></del> the passage &#x2014; &amp; Qu. The truth of it &#x2014; see whether instances may not be found of the infliction of other punishment in each case even Death.</note></p>
<head>
INTROD. Sanction Penal X Praemiary<!-- ligature --> [BR] ]  </head>
     




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:11, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

DIVISION OF LAW — All Laws penal

To this position however several apparent exceptions may be classes of Laws may at first sight seem to
furnish so many exceptions. The First it may be asked, where is example alleged may be that of a Law offering a bounty as an
encouragement to perform an act therein specified: such for instance as
the first made for the that of the 1st of W. J. Moury ch. 2 to encourage the exportation of corn. And have it is
to be acknowledged that the primary motive created offer'd by the Law is a reward
[which in this and similar instances it might well be considering 1st
supererogation That the measure which was the object of the Law tho' expedient was not necessary to be obtained
secondly; that the persons who were the objects of it expence of the reward would only be incurred in proportion as
the fund out of which it was to come should be increased; and thirdly
that the persons to be rewarded were] This is a note But still even here it's effectuation execution depends rests
ultimately upon punishment; for if sombody are is to receive, some persons are permitted others are to
pay; and the obligation motive Sanction holden up to them upon to them is a coercive penal obligation our


---page break---

Another may be that of a Law of which instances might be given + + In. an Instance
which permitts made for the sole purpose of permitting certain acts to be dome by certain persons As for instance the prints Acts enabling persons to make Sales of Estates &c. — but what
that permission amount to without when examined meant no more than a prohibition exprest or implied
to all other persons from hindering them? and that prohibition has must ever
have some sanction to enforce it. which sanction when nothing more is said is the Costs of litigation.

After these [stronger] instances it is scarce necessary to mention that of de distributive
Laws in general where the only costs for are as a Sanction Penalty which is not the less real
for not being particularly specified: or that of certain ancient Acts pass of
date when the untutored simplicity of Legislators had not yet learnt the expediency of
restrictive specifications, to which though they wear the pose of a prohibition, no
particular Sanction is annexed — The indefinite plenitude of the kingly
authority was trusted to as [afforded] a fund of sanctions. L Colne says — Fine & Imprisonment was the penalty when none was particularly specified. In the passage — & Qu. The truth of it — see whether instances may not be found of the infliction of other punishment in each case even Death.

INTROD. Sanction Penal X Praemiary [BR] ]




Identifier: | JB/096/105/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

096

Main Headings

legislation

Folio number

105

Info in main headings field

introd. sanction penal & praemiary

Image

001

Titles

division of law - all laws penal

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f7

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

31109

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in