JB/122/315/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/122/315/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto upload
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p> <add>14 Aug. 1808</add> <add> + </add> <lb/><note>Arrangements Suggested <lb/>III. Examine Accountants</note></p>


<p> <add> 6 </add> <lb/> <del> Query <gap/> <gap/> - <gap/> <gap/> to<lb/> Inspection.</del></p>


<p> For the <add> almost </add> extensive performance <add> which, in the judicatory in question </add> <del> that</del> seems to <add> have been </add> <del> <gap/> </del> given <lb/> to the epistolatory <add> mode of scrutiny, </add> in <sic>contradistinction</sic> to the <add> real or as it may be termed</add> <lb/><hi rend="underline">colloquial</hi> <lb/> mode, a rational course, <add> (even in this <unclear>unsaid</unclear> judicatory, not to speak of <unclear>fie-fed</unclear> ones)</add>, may, <add> it should seem </add> without much difficulty <lb/> be found.  In personal examination a sort of <lb/>operation has been observed such as it might not <lb/>be claimed advisable to commit to a single <del> person</del> <add> officer </add> <lb/><del> and his subordinate</del> <add> his station a subordinate one</add>, and his conduct not <del> being</del> subjected<lb/> to that <add> perennial sort of </add> check which, so far as employed, it <lb/>if the nature of <hi rend="underline">writing</hi> to apply.  Personal examination <lb/>would thus be thought to have a claim - and <add> at least </add> as <del> <gap/> </del> <lb/> imperative a claim as any other part of the business - <lb/>to the attention <add><del>labour</del> </add> of a <hi rend="underline">Commissioner,</hi> or as a word since <lb/> other parts of the business <del> are</del> considered as requiring <lb/> <del> to </del> <add> an entire</add> <hi rend="underline">Board</hi>, to the attention of the <hi rend="underline">Board</hi>.</p>
<p> In this shape then the extraction of evidence <lb/>is one question, <del> requires</del> presenting a demand for attendance, <lb/>and not <del>only for </del> attendance <add> only </add> but <add> also </add> for thought : <add>[+]</add><note><del>[+]the expense </del> <lb/>[+] if the most expressive article of the law viz. <hi rend="underline">thought</hi> the expense requiring to be borne by </note><lb/><add> <del> <gap/> and this </del> </add> <del> in the part of as many</del> <add> some <hi rend="underline">one</hi> at least the number of </add> Commissioners intentions it be <lb/>that has been deemed necessary to form the Board.</p>
<p>To <del> this expressive</del> mode of of procedure <add> <del> very nature</del> <add><hi rend="underline">this</hi> expensive</add></add> <del> conducting</del> <lb/><del> term with thought <add> when <gap/> </add>in the <gap/> superior state <gap/> <gap/> being <gap/> </del><lb/><del> a footing with expense </del> substitute the epistolatory mode, <lb/>a <gap/> for which <add> the attendance of </add> a single Judge and his <del> <gap/> </del><add> stature an </add> inferior <lb/> <del> <gap/> </del> <add> one, </add> may, it is supposed suffice, the <del> great <gap/> </del> <add> frugality </add> <lb/>of this expedient is in that point of view, manifold and <lb/><del> evidentiable <gap/> </del> <add> beyond dispute.  On </add> the part of the suitor, increase of labour <lb/> and vexation may <add> indeed</add> to any amount be the result:<lb/>but the scene of their labour and vexation lying without <gap/>, <lb/><del>tho labour and vexation <gap/> </del> <add> <del> such</del> inconvenience<del> in the <gap/> </del><add> thus <del> <gap/> </del> circumstanced </add> makes its escape from </add> observation, and the account <lb/> of it is not among the <hi rend="underline">Accounts</hi> of which the Board takes cognizance.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:33, 4 February 2020

'Click Here To Edit

14 Aug. 1808 +
Arrangements Suggested
III. Examine Accountants

6
Query - to
Inspection.

For the almost extensive performance which, in the judicatory in question that seems to have been given
to the epistolatory mode of scrutiny, in contradistinction to the real or as it may be termed
colloquial
mode, a rational course, (even in this unsaid judicatory, not to speak of fie-fed ones), may, it should seem without much difficulty
be found. In personal examination a sort of
operation has been observed such as it might not
be claimed advisable to commit to a single person officer
and his subordinate his station a subordinate one, and his conduct not being subjected
to that perennial sort of check which, so far as employed, it
if the nature of writing to apply. Personal examination
would thus be thought to have a claim - and at least as
imperative a claim as any other part of the business -
to the attention labour of a Commissioner, or as a word since
other parts of the business are considered as requiring
to an entire Board, to the attention of the Board.

In this shape then the extraction of evidence
is one question, requires presenting a demand for attendance,
and not only for attendance only but also for thought : [+][+]the expense
[+] if the most expressive article of the law viz. thought the expense requiring to be borne by

and this in the part of as many some one at least the number of Commissioners intentions it be
that has been deemed necessary to form the Board.

To this expressive mode of of procedure very nature <add>this expensive</add> conducting
term with thought when in the superior state being
a footing with expense substitute the epistolatory mode,
a for which the attendance of a single Judge and his stature an inferior
one, may, it is supposed suffice, the great frugality
of this expedient is in that point of view, manifold and
evidentiable beyond dispute. On the part of the suitor, increase of labour
and vexation may indeed to any amount be the result:
but the scene of their labour and vexation lying without ,
tho labour and vexation such inconvenience in the <add> thus circumstanced makes its escape from </add> observation, and the account
of it is not among the Accounts of which the Board takes cognizance.



Identifier: | JB/122/315/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122.

Date_1

1808-08-14

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

122

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

315

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

E6

Penner

Watermarks

TH 1806

Marginals

Paper Producer

Andre Morellet

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1806

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in