JB/121/070/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/121/070/003: Difference between revisions

Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
<head>§8 F. 12 <hi rend="superscript">+</hi> Establishment enlarged &amp;c (20 Doc) (41</head>
<head>§8 F. 12 <hi rend="superscript">+</hi> Establishment enlarged &amp;c (20 Doc) (41</head>


<p>N.B. <hi rend="underline">This</hi> Section (it is evident) does nothing towards giving a description of <lb/>the <hi rend="underline">Classes of Convicts</hi> capable of being consigned to the Penitentiary House, <lb/>but occupies itself only about the <hi rend="underline">powers</hi>, under which they shall be dealt with: <lb/>the descriptions of <hi rend="underline">the classes of</hi> Convicts it supposes <hi rend="underline">pre-established </hi> by §.1 already <lb/>recited. </p>


<p>N.B. Along with this is sent a copy of so much of the Statute in question <lb/>as concerns the matter in hand: the words as above recited that apply to the <lb/>question being scored under with Red Ink. &#x2014; </p>


 
<p>If the sentence, containing the words commented upon, were but <hi rend="underline">left <lb/>out</hi>, all the <hi rend="underline">rest</hi> of the letter would be clear at least, if not absolutely unexceptionable <lb/>What may be considered as the <hi rend="underline">second</hi> part of the letter, is occupied by the "<hi rend="underline">other</hi>" <!-- how to indicate double underlining? --><lb/>class of Convicts in question viz: <hi rend="underline">un</hi>transportable ones: and it is in relation to <lb/>this that an inclination is expressed to <hi rend="underline">think it very inexpedient to move them <lb/>from the County Gaols unless the crowded state of those Gaols should render it <lb/>absolutely necessary</hi>. In this inclination, as thus expressed, there is nothing indeed <lb/>that runs <hi rend="underline">directly</hi> in the teeth of the <hi rend="underline">letter</hi> of the law: <del>and</del> yet, after Parliament <lb/>has passed an Act, for the express and <hi rend="underline">declared</hi> purpose of consigning <add>to</add> the prison in question <lb/>the class of <hi rend="underline">un</hi>transportable Convicts, <hi rend="underline">as well as</hi> the class of transportable ones, it <lb/><hi rend="underline">does</hi> seem like <hi rend="underline">a stretch of authority</hi> <add>&#x2014;</add> an assumption of something very like <hi rend="underline">legislative <lb/>power</hi> <add>(b) &#x2014;</add> <note>(b) In notes</note> to take measures, for the <hi rend="underline">express</hi> purpose, of <unclear>ordering</unclear> the execution of this part <lb/>of the intentions of <add>the</add> Act <hi rend="underline">physically</hi> impracticable. By this means the Secretary <lb/>of State for the time being, not content with pursuing his own notions of what is <lb/>expedient in this behalf, <hi rend="underline">while he himself continues of Office</hi>, ties up the hands of <lb/>his <hi rend="underline">Successors</hi>, and forces <add><hi rend="underline">them</hi></add> to pursue the same notions of expedience, however opposite <lb/>their own may be. &#x2014; </p>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:31, 4 February 2020

'Click Here To Edit

§8 F. 12 + Establishment enlarged &c (20 Doc) (41

N.B. This Section (it is evident) does nothing towards giving a description of
the Classes of Convicts capable of being consigned to the Penitentiary House,
but occupies itself only about the powers, under which they shall be dealt with:
the descriptions of the classes of Convicts it supposes pre-established by §.1 already
recited.

N.B. Along with this is sent a copy of so much of the Statute in question
as concerns the matter in hand: the words as above recited that apply to the
question being scored under with Red Ink. —

If the sentence, containing the words commented upon, were but left
out
, all the rest of the letter would be clear at least, if not absolutely unexceptionable
What may be considered as the second part of the letter, is occupied by the "other"
class of Convicts in question viz: untransportable ones: and it is in relation to
this that an inclination is expressed to think it very inexpedient to move them
from the County Gaols unless the crowded state of those Gaols should render it
absolutely necessary
. In this inclination, as thus expressed, there is nothing indeed
that runs directly in the teeth of the letter of the law: and yet, after Parliament
has passed an Act, for the express and declared purpose of consigning to the prison in question
the class of untransportable Convicts, as well as the class of transportable ones, it
does seem like a stretch of authority an assumption of something very like legislative
power
(b) — (b) In notes to take measures, for the express purpose, of ordering the execution of this part
of the intentions of the Act physically impracticable. By this means the Secretary
of State for the time being, not content with pursuing his own notions of what is
expedient in this behalf, while he himself continues of Office, ties up the hands of
his Successors, and forces them to pursue the same notions of expedience, however opposite
their own may be. —



Identifier: | JB/121/070/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 121.

Date_1

1800-03-10

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

121

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

070

Info in main headings field

Establishment Enlarged

Image

003

Titles

Mr Bentham to Mr Nepean

Category

Correspondence

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

D18 F45 / D19 F46 / D20 F47 / D20 F48

Penner

Watermarks

1798 AM

Marginals

Paper Producer

Frances Wright

Corrections

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1798

Notes public

See note to letter 1514, vol. 6

ID Number

003

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in