JB/150/389/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/150/389/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- Page written in faint pencil -->
<p><unclear>p</unclear> VIII <unclear>Art</unclear> 4<lb/>
If the<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">pleasure</hi><lb/>
reaped from<lb/>
the commitment<lb/>
of any<lb/>
crime is <hi rend="underline">as</hi><lb/>
<hi rend="underline">nothing</hi><lb/>
compared<lb/>
to the <hi rend="underline">pain</hi><lb/>
which <hi rend="underline">of</hi><lb/>
<hi rend="underline">course</hi> follows,<lb/>
why<lb/>
is <hi rend="underline">additional</hi><lb/>
pain necessary<lb/>
in the<lb/>
way of<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">punishment?</hi><lb/>
or, if the<lb/>
above is literally<lb/>
true<lb/>
<del>would</del> <add>how comes it to</add><lb/>
<add><unclear>pass start</unclear></add> crimes<lb/>
continue to<lb/>
be committed? &#x2014;</p><pb/>
 
<p>Answer &#x2014;<lb/>
Because the<lb/>
pleasure from<lb/>
the crime falls<lb/>
to the share of<lb/>
the criminal<lb/>
<gap/> as the pain<lb/>
from the same<lb/>
crime falls<lb/>
not to his<lb/>
share, but to <lb/>
that of other<lb/>
people whom<lb/>
he does not<lb/>
care about,<lb/>
(i:e: the consideration<lb/>
of<lb/>
whose pain<lb/>
gives him<lb/>
no pain) hence<lb/>
the necessity<lb/>
of an operation<lb/>
on the part of<lb/>
government<lb/>
for putting<lb/>
him to pain<lb/>
(i:e: for punishing<lb/>
him) in<lb/>
case of his committing<lb/>
the mischievous<lb/>
act<lb/>
which by the<lb/>
apprehension</p>  <pb/>
 
<p>of such punishment<lb/>
it<lb/>
is intended<lb/>
to deter him<lb/>
from committing.</p>
 






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:43, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

p VIII Art 4
If the
pleasure
reaped from
the commitment
of any
crime is as
nothing
compared
to the pain
which of
course follows,
why
is additional
pain necessary
in the
way of
punishment?
or, if the
above is literally
true
would how comes it to
pass start crimes
continue to
be committed? —


---page break---

Answer —
Because the
pleasure from
the crime falls
to the share of
the criminal
as the pain
from the same
crime falls
not to his
share, but to
that of other
people whom
he does not
care about,
(i:e: the consideration
of
whose pain
gives him
no pain) hence
the necessity
of an operation
on the part of
government
for putting
him to pain
(i:e: for punishing
him) in
case of his committing
the mischievous
act
which by the
apprehension


---page break---

of such punishment
it
is intended
to deter him
from committing.




Identifier: | JB/150/389/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

150

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales; police bill

Folio number

389

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

b3 / f7

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

50610

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in