★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<!-- This page is organised in 4 columns --><add> 2 </add> <lb/ | <!-- This page is organised in 4 columns --> | ||
<p><add> 2 </add> <lb/> Charge 5 <lb/> 4 Query 1<hi rend="superscript">st</hi><lb/> Requisition 2<hi rend="superscript">d</hi><lb/><del> Query 1</del> Contract <lb/> executed, produces it - </p> | |||
<p> 1 <lb/> Answers already <lb/> given to this requisition <lb/> viz <lb/> 1. by the Draft as <lb/> printed. p.1</p> | |||
<p> 2 <lb/> 2. By the reference to it <lb/> in Accountants introductory<lb/> Letter, & to his <lb/> history of the whole <lb/> transaction down to <lb/> 23 June 1798<lb/> p 1</p> | |||
<p>3 <lb/> Whether executed or no <lb/> since that time <hi rend="underline">irrelevant</hi><lb/> the whole money being <lb/> stated as disbursed <lb/> <hi rend="underline">before</hi> that time. <lb/> p.1. </p> | |||
<p> 4. <lb/> - as appears on the <lb/> face of the Acc<hi rend="superscript">t</hi> books <lb/> sent in as Vouchers <lb/> and referred to in the <lb/> Account. <lb/> p.1. </p> | |||
<p> 5. <lb/> - which the Ch. Inspector <lb/> acknowledges himself <lb/> to have read. p.2 </p> | |||
<p> 6 <lb/> Conduct of the Ch. Inspector <lb/> 1. Calling for information <lb/> on facts already proved<lb/> 2 Calling for a document <lb/> the inutility & irrelevancy <lb/> of which <lb/> was before his eyes. </p> | |||
<pb/> | |||
<p>Charge 6 <lb/> Query 1st <lb/> 3 Requisition 3<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Treasury's <lb/> <hi rend="underline">intentions</hi>.</p> | |||
<p> 2 <lb/> 2. The Information already <lb/> furnished by Account<hi rend="superscript">ts</hi> <lb/> - examination - </p> | |||
<p> 3 <lb/> 2. By C. Long's Letter - <lb/> printed in 28<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> Sep<hi rend="superscript">t</hi><lb/> referred to in this <lb/> query. <lb/> p.1 </p> | |||
<p> 4 <lb/> 3 - by the acc<hi rend="superscript">t</hi> in which <lb/> that money & more <lb/> is stated as already <lb/> disbursed in 1796. p.2.</p> | |||
<p> 5 <lb/> Sole case in which <lb/> this requisition could <lb/> not have been irrelevant <lb/> - a possibility that <lb/> part of the money <lb/> remained undisbursed. <lb/> p.2.</p> | |||
<p> 6 <lb/> The non- existence of <lb/> this case being before <lb/> his eyes, the requisition <lb/> was irrelevant & vexatious<lb/> p.2</p> | |||
<pb/> | |||
<p> Charge 7 <lb/> 4. Query 1st <lb/> Requisition 4 - <lb/> 1<lb/> Requisition 4 - <gap/> <lb/> in Correspondence - </p> | |||
<p> 2. <lb/> Unbounded latitude <lb/> and thence vexatious mass <lb/> of this requisite<lb/> p.1. </p> | |||
<p> 3 <lb/> Vexatiousness of this <lb/> requisition <lb/> 1. In respect of trouble <lb/> & <sic>expence</sic> </p> | |||
<p> 4 - <lb/> 2. in respect of disclosure - <lb/>vexation viz - <lb/>1 to the Account<hi rend="superscript">t</hi><lb/> p 9 </p> | |||
<p> 5. <lb/> 2. to government <lb/> men. p.11 </p> | |||
<p> 6. <lb/> 3 Vexation that might <lb/> have resulted had the <lb/> irrelevant documents <lb/> called for been impounded. <lb/> p.12 </p> | |||
<p> 7 <lb/> <sic>Thou</sic> said by Chief <lb/> Inspectors query to <lb/> pair "no character of <lb/> "Voucher" impounded <lb/> notwithstanding. p.13 </p> | |||
<p> 8 <lb/> Was this a trap? <lb/> If so Account<hi rend="superscript">t</hi> escaped <lb/> it <del><gap/></del> p.13 </p> | |||
<pb/> | |||
<p>Charge 8 <lb/>8 <sic>Stampt</sic> receipt prematurely<lb/> required. </p> <p> 1 <lb/> Charge 8 Query 8 <lb/> Premature requisition of <lb/> <sic>Stampt</sic> Receipt from Book <lb/> £1751 " 11 " 9 </p> | |||
<p> 2 <lb/> Duty of a Chief Inspector <lb/> in this head - <lb/> For documents of no use <lb/> but in case of allowance, <lb/> requisition should not be <lb/>made, without intimation <lb/> of its eventuality. </p> | |||
<p> 3 <lb/> Conduct of Ch. Inspector <lb/> in this head - <lb/> Requisitions starting <lb/> difficulties and tending <lb/> to disallowance by which <lb/> the document called for <lb/> would be rendered useless <lb/> <add> being resolved on </add> he puts before them a <lb/> <hi rend="underline">peremptory</hi> requisition, <lb/> calling in the first instance <lb/> for the document <lb/> he was thus labouring <lb/> to render useless. <lb/> p3 </p> | |||
<p>4 <lb/> Oppressive disposition <lb/> indicated by such conduct <lb/> - Disposition to abuse the <lb/> of powers of his office <lb/> for the purpose of imposing <lb/> on Accountants <lb/> <hi rend="underline">taxes,</hi> under a consciousness<lb/> of their injustice. <lb/> p.4</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
2
Charge 5
4 Query 1st
Requisition 2d
Query 1 Contract
executed, produces it -
1
Answers already
given to this requisition
viz
1. by the Draft as
printed. p.1
2
2. By the reference to it
in Accountants introductory
Letter, & to his
history of the whole
transaction down to
23 June 1798
p 1
3
Whether executed or no
since that time irrelevant
the whole money being
stated as disbursed
before that time.
p.1.
4.
- as appears on the
face of the Acct books
sent in as Vouchers
and referred to in the
Account.
p.1.
5.
- which the Ch. Inspector
acknowledges himself
to have read. p.2
6
Conduct of the Ch. Inspector
1. Calling for information
on facts already proved
2 Calling for a document
the inutility & irrelevancy
of which
was before his eyes.
---page break---
Charge 6
Query 1st
3 Requisition 3d Treasury's
intentions.
2
2. The Information already
furnished by Accountts
- examination -
3
2. By C. Long's Letter -
printed in 28th Sept
referred to in this
query.
p.1
4
3 - by the acct in which
that money & more
is stated as already
disbursed in 1796. p.2.
5
Sole case in which
this requisition could
not have been irrelevant
- a possibility that
part of the money
remained undisbursed.
p.2.
6
The non- existence of
this case being before
his eyes, the requisition
was irrelevant & vexatious
p.2
---page break---
Charge 7
4. Query 1st
Requisition 4 -
1
Requisition 4 -
in Correspondence -
2.
Unbounded latitude
and thence vexatious mass
of this requisite
p.1.
3
Vexatiousness of this
requisition
1. In respect of trouble
& expence
4 -
2. in respect of disclosure -
vexation viz -
1 to the Accountt
p 9
5.
2. to government
men. p.11
6.
3 Vexation that might
have resulted had the
irrelevant documents
called for been impounded.
p.12
7
Thou said by Chief
Inspectors query to
pair "no character of
"Voucher" impounded
notwithstanding. p.13
8
Was this a trap?
If so Accountt escaped
it p.13
---page break---
Charge 8
8 Stampt receipt prematurely
required.
1
Charge 8 Query 8
Premature requisition of
Stampt Receipt from Book
£1751 " 11 " 9
2
Duty of a Chief Inspector
in this head -
For documents of no use
but in case of allowance,
requisition should not be
made, without intimation
of its eventuality.
3
Conduct of Ch. Inspector
in this head -
Requisitions starting
difficulties and tending
to disallowance by which
the document called for
would be rendered useless
being resolved on he puts before them a
peremptory requisition,
calling in the first instance
for the document
he was thus labouring
to render useless.
p3
4
Oppressive disposition
indicated by such conduct
- Disposition to abuse the
of powers of his office
for the purpose of imposing
on Accountants
taxes, under a consciousness
of their injustice.
p.4
|
Identifier: | JB/122/109/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1-6, 1-6, 1-8, 1-4 |
|||
|
122 |
Panopticon |
||
|
109 |
|||
|
001 |
|||
|
Marginal summary sheet |
1 |
||
|
Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property. |
D2 |
||
|
001 |
|||
