JB/122/133/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/122/133/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p> <add>18 July 1808</add> <add>+ Charge 7 </add><lb/><note>Charge 7 <lb/>4 Query 1<lb/>Requisition 4<lb/>Observation <lb/> 6<lb/>3. Vexation that might <lb/>have resulted from <lb/>had the irrelevant<lb/>documents thus <lb/> called <lb/> for been impounded</note></p> <p> <add> (<del>6</del>7) 12</add><lb/><del> For <gap/> <gap/> about through it </del> Among the effect effects <lb/>there be irrelevant and unwarrantable requisitions <del> around which </del> <add> which </add><lb/>tended to produce there is one which through <del> not produced</del> by the Accountant <lb/><gap/> prevented from being produced, is of two <gap/> &amp;nature<lb/> <add> to <gap/> be proffered altogether without notice.</add> <lb/><del>In <gap/> it be in the <gap/> items of the effects it might </del><lb/><del> been had in relation to <unclear>probate</unclear>, or <gap/> <gap/> to public<del/> <lb/><gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> effect</del> <add><del><gap/></del></add> <del><gap/> <gap/> which <gap/> </del> <lb/><del> in contemplation or not in contemplation of Mr Chief <lb/><del> Inspector, would equally have resulted from a compliance</del> <lb/><del>with there has irrelevant and unwarrantable requisition</del> </p> <p><del> By </del> <add> In and by </add> a letter <del> about </del> <add> <gap> </add> dates the 14<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> of this month <add> July </add> addressed <note>24 July 1808</note><lb/>by M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> <unclear>Walls</unclear> in his character of Secretary to the Audit Office at the Adelphi<lb/>to this Accountant, and received by this Accountant on <lb/>the next day, <add> 15th July it is stated as from the Commissioners as</add> <del> it appears that when as</del> being unusual,<note>25 July 1808</note><lb/>"and contrary to the rules of this Office, to part with <lb/> "my Vouchers that have been delivered in support of <lb/>"an account."</p><p>In and by the terms of the said <add> Mr Chief Inspector's </add> fourth requisition of <lb/>the <add> first</add> Query <del> a</del> <del> I was </del> <add> the Accountant is </add> called upon "to <sic>transmitt</sic> to this <lb/>"office" (from which <add> he (Mr Accountant) </add> presumes they would have passed <add> of course</add> into <lb/>his <add> Mr Chief Inspector's) </add> hands) <hi rend="underline">the originals or</hi> authenticated copies of <lb/>any letters or communication he "(the Accountant) may <lb/>"have received from the Treasury on the subject."  By <lb/><del> sending transmit taking </del> <add> causing to be taken </add> <hi rend="underline">authenticated copies</hi> <add> for the purpose of transmitting them </add> the Accountant <lb/>would have been <add> subjected</add> <del>put</del> <add><del><gap>/del> </add> not only to considerable <lb/>expense, but <add> to very </add> considerable trouble. By transmitting the originals <lb/>without keeping or taking any such copies, he would <add> have </add> served <lb/>not only the which of the expense but a considerable part <lb/>of the trouble.  <del> If the </del> Whether the original <del><gap/></del> <add> <gap/> </add> in <gap/> <lb/>optimal terms called for would, had they been <del> called </del> <lb/>transmitted, have been deemed "<hi rend="underline">Vouchers delivered in</hi><lb/>"<hi rend="underline">support of an Account</hi>, this Accountant can not <lb/>take upon him to pronounce: it is a point <add> the determination quickly (he presumes)</add> <del> that </del> risk with <add> <del>late </del> </add><lb/>the authority in which this rule originated. </p>
<p> <add>18 July 1808</add> <add>+ Charge 7 </add><lb/><note>Charge 7 <lb/>4 Query 1<lb/>Requisition 4<lb/>Observation <lb/> 6<lb/>3. Vexation that might <lb/>have resulted from <lb/>had the irrelevant<lb/>documents thus <lb/> called <lb/> for been impounded</note></p>  
 
<p> <add> (<del>6</del>7) 12</add><lb/><del> For <gap/> <gap/> about through it </del> Among the effect effects <lb/>there be irrelevant and unwarrantable requisitions <del> around which </del> <add> which </add><lb/>tended to produce there is one which through <del> not produced</del> by the Accountant <lb/><gap/> prevented from being produced, is of two <gap/> &amp;nature<lb/> <add> to <gap/> be proffered altogether without notice.</add></p>
 
<p><del>In <gap/> it be in the <gap/> items of the effects it might </del><lb/><del> been had in relation to probate, or <gap/> <gap/> to public<del/> <lb/>
<gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> effect</del> <add><del><gap/></del></add> <del><gap/> <gap/> which <gap/> </del> <lb/><del> in contemplation or not in contemplation of Mr Chief <lb/><del> Inspector, would equally have resulted from a compliance</del> <lb/><del>with there has irrelevant and unwarrantable requisition</del> </p>  
 
<p><del> By </del> <add> In and by </add> a letter <del> about </del> <add> <gap> </add> dates the 14<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> of this month <add> July </add> addressed <note>24 July 1808</note><lb/>by M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> <unclear>Walls</unclear> in his character of Secretary to the Audit Office at the Adelphi<lb/>to this Accountant, and received by this Accountant on <lb/>the next day, <add> 15th July it is stated as from the Commissioners as</add> <del> it appears that when as</del> being unusual,<note>25 July 1808</note><lb/>"and contrary to the rules of this Office, to part with <lb/> "my Vouchers that have been delivered in support of <lb/>"an account."</p>
 
<p>In and by the terms of the said <add> Mr Chief Inspector's </add> fourth requisition of <lb/>the <add> first</add> Query <del> a</del> <del> I was </del> <add> the Accountant is </add> called upon "to <sic>transmitt</sic> to this <lb/>"office" (from which <add> he (Mr Accountant) </add> presumes they would have passed <add> of course</add> into <lb/>his <add> Mr Chief Inspector's) </add> hands) <hi rend="underline">the originals or</hi> authenticated copies of <lb/>any letters or communication he "(the Accountant) may <lb/>"have received from the Treasury on the subject."  By <lb/><del> sending transmit taking </del> <add> causing to be taken </add> <hi rend="underline">authenticated copies</hi> <add> for the purpose of transmitting them </add> the Accountant <lb/>would have been <add> subjected</add> <del>put</del> <add><del><gap>/del> </add> not only to considerable <lb/>expense, but <add> to very </add> considerable trouble. By transmitting the originals <lb/>without keeping or taking any such copies, he would <add> have </add> served <lb/>not only the which of the expense but a considerable part <lb/>of the trouble.  <del> If the </del> Whether the original <del>that</del> <add> thus </add> in <gap/> <lb/>optimal terms called for would, had they been <del> called </del> <lb/>transmitted, have been deemed "<hi rend="underline">Vouchers delivered in</hi><lb/>"<hi rend="underline">support of an Account</hi>, this Accountant can not <lb/>take upon him to pronounce: it is a point <add> the determination quickly (he presumes)</add> <del> that </del> risk with <add> <del>late </del> </add><lb/>the authority in which this rule originated. </p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:32, 4 February 2020

'Click Here To Edit

18 July 1808 + Charge 7
Charge 7
4 Query 1
Requisition 4
Observation
6
3. Vexation that might
have resulted from
had the irrelevant
documents thus
called
for been impounded

(67) 12
For about through it Among the effect effects
there be irrelevant and unwarrantable requisitions around which which
tended to produce there is one which through not produced by the Accountant
prevented from being produced, is of two &nature
to be proffered altogether without notice.

In it be in the items of the effects it might
been had in relation to probate, or to public
effect
which
in contemplation or not in contemplation of Mr Chief
Inspector, would equally have resulted from a compliance

with there has irrelevant and unwarrantable requisition

By In and by a letter about <gap> dates the 14th of this month July addressed 24 July 1808
by Mr Walls in his character of Secretary to the Audit Office at the Adelphi
to this Accountant, and received by this Accountant on
the next day, 15th July it is stated as from the Commissioners as it appears that when as being unusual,25 July 1808
"and contrary to the rules of this Office, to part with
"my Vouchers that have been delivered in support of
"an account."

In and by the terms of the said Mr Chief Inspector's fourth requisition of
the first Query a I was the Accountant is called upon "to transmitt to this
"office" (from which he (Mr Accountant) presumes they would have passed of course into
his Mr Chief Inspector's) hands) the originals or authenticated copies of
any letters or communication he "(the Accountant) may
"have received from the Treasury on the subject." By
sending transmit taking causing to be taken authenticated copies for the purpose of transmitting them the Accountant
would have been subjected put <gap>/del> not only to considerable
expense, but to very considerable trouble. By transmitting the originals
without keeping or taking any such copies, he would have served
not only the which of the expense but a considerable part
of the trouble. If the Whether the original that thus in
optimal terms called for would, had they been called
transmitted, have been deemed "Vouchers delivered in
"support of an Account, this Accountant can not
take upon him to pronounce: it is a point the determination quickly (he presumes) that risk with late
the authority in which this rule originated.


Identifier: | JB/122/133/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122.

Date_1

1808-07-18

Marginal Summary Numbering

6

Box

122

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

133

Info in main headings field

Charge 7

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

C7 / E12

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

See note 3 to letter 1986, vol. 7

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in