★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p> <add>13 Aug. 1808</add> <add> + </add> <lb/><note>Arrangements suggested<lb/>III. Examine Accountants</note></p> <p> <add> 2 </add> <lb/> In the cases which <del> now </del> come before the superior <lb/>judicatories, the nature of the case affording an individual <lb/>in the character of plaintiff, and the <hi rend="underline"><unclear>onus parbound</unclear></hi> by my <lb/> <add> in general </add> in that plaintiff it is, <add> for the most part by </add> <del> <gap/> </del> the plaintiff <lb/>rather than the defendant that the <del> disadvantage</del> <add> inconvenience</add> <lb/>resulting from that deficiency is sustained. </p> <p>In the business <add> practice</add> of the <hi rend="underline">Audit Board</hi>, then <unclear><hi rend="underline">onus</hi></unclear><lb/><hi rend="underline"><unclear>parbound</unclear></hi> lying on the defendant, he has often the <lb/>whole more to gain and less to lose by the application <lb/>of this most efficient mode of enquiry then <del> be</del> in <add> cases </add> the <add> [+] <note>[+] whether official or civil</note> <lb/> <del> <gap/> of </del> <add> that <del> <gap/> </del> complexion</add> than ordinary Courts. <gap/> it is <lb/>that <add> in case of a plan of </add> <del> a plan of </del> fraud, <del> in </del> such personal examination <lb/>may in <unclear>case</unclear> as on all other occasions be <gap/> in a superior <lb/>degree efficient to the purpose of giving a complete <add> <del>subjecting it <gap/> </del> </add> <lb/> <gap/> to it. But <del> for as much as </del> <add> considering that </add> the epistolary <lb/> mark of scrutiny may <del> for one </del> of course <del> be </del> <lb/><add> under the authority of the Commissioners, be </add> constrained as long as they please, and there is nothing <lb/>to compel in these parts the <unclear>allowance</unclear> of any item <lb/>in relation to which they have not received <sic>compleat</sic><lb/> satisfaction, a dishonest <del> defendant </del> <add> party </add> <gap/> not, <lb/>in this case, from the non-application of <del> this</del> so <lb/> searching a scrutiny, any such advantage as <lb/>with such lamentable frequency he can not but derive <lb/>from it in the function of the <del> ordinary Court of judicatories </del> <add> superior judicatories, </add></p> | <p> <add>13 Aug. 1808</add> <add> + </add> <lb/><note>Arrangements suggested<lb/>III. Examine Accountants</note></p> | ||
<p> <add> 2 </add> <lb/> In the cases which <del> now </del> come before the superior <lb/>judicatories, the nature of the case affording an individual <lb/>in the character of plaintiff, and the <hi rend="underline"><unclear>onus parbound</unclear></hi> by my <lb/> <add> in general </add> in that plaintiff it is, <add> for the most part by </add> <del> <gap/> </del> the plaintiff <lb/>rather than the defendant that the <del> disadvantage</del> <add> inconvenience</add> <lb/>resulting from that deficiency is sustained. </p> | |||
<p>In the business <add> practice</add> of the <hi rend="underline">Audit Board</hi>, then <unclear><hi rend="underline">onus</hi></unclear><lb/><hi rend="underline"><unclear>parbound</unclear></hi> lying on the defendant, he has often the <lb/>whole more to gain and less to lose by the application <lb/>of this most efficient mode of enquiry then <del> be</del> in <add> cases </add> the <add> [+] <note>[+] whether official or civil</note> <lb/> <del> <gap/> of </del> <add> that <del> <gap/> </del> complexion</add> than ordinary Courts. <gap/> it is <lb/>that <add> in case of a plan of </add> <del> a plan of </del> fraud, <del> in </del> such personal examination <lb/>may in <unclear>case</unclear> as on all other occasions be <gap/> in a superior <lb/>degree efficient to the purpose of giving a complete <add> <del>subjecting it <gap/> </del> </add> <lb/> <gap/> to it. But <del> for as much as </del> <add> considering that </add> the epistolary <lb/> mark of scrutiny may <del> for one </del> of course <del> be </del> <lb/><add> under the authority of the Commissioners, be </add> constrained as long as they please, and there is nothing <lb/>to compel in these parts the <unclear>allowance</unclear> of any item <lb/>in relation to which they have not received <sic>compleat</sic><lb/> satisfaction, a dishonest <del> defendant </del> <add> party </add> <gap/> not, <lb/>in this case, from the non-application of <del> this</del> so <lb/> searching a scrutiny, any such advantage as <lb/>with such lamentable frequency he can not but derive <lb/>from it in the function of the <del> ordinary Court of judicatories </del> <add> superior judicatories, </add></p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
13 Aug. 1808 +
Arrangements suggested
III. Examine Accountants
2
In the cases which now come before the superior
judicatories, the nature of the case affording an individual
in the character of plaintiff, and the onus parbound by my
in general in that plaintiff it is, for the most part by the plaintiff
rather than the defendant that the disadvantage inconvenience
resulting from that deficiency is sustained.
In the business practice of the Audit Board, then onus
parbound lying on the defendant, he has often the
whole more to gain and less to lose by the application
of this most efficient mode of enquiry then be in cases the [+] [+] whether official or civil
of <add> that complexion than ordinary Courts. it is
that in case of a plan of a plan of fraud, in such personal examination
may in case as on all other occasions be in a superior
degree efficient to the purpose of giving a complete subjecting it
to it. But for as much as considering that the epistolary
mark of scrutiny may for one of course be
under the authority of the Commissioners, be constrained as long as they please, and there is nothing
to compel in these parts the allowance of any item
in relation to which they have not received compleat
satisfaction, a dishonest defendant party not,
in this case, from the non-application of this so
searching a scrutiny, any such advantage as
with such lamentable frequency he can not but derive
from it in the function of the ordinary Court of judicatories superior judicatories,
|
Identifier: | JB/122/311/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1808-08-13 |
|||
|
122 |
Panopticon |
||
|
311 |
|||
|
001 |
|||
|
Text sheet |
1 |
||
|
Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property. |
E2 |
||
|
001 |
|||
