JB/015/035/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/015/035/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/015/035/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/015/035/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->14 June 1816<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Political Deontology</head></p>
 
<p>A portion?  Good: – but what portion?</p>
 
<p><del>For an answer</del> The essence of this theory such as<lb/>
 
it is, being to be found altogether <add>solely</add> in the metaphor <add>figure of speech</add><lb/>
to find an answer to the above question, it is to this <add>the</add><lb/>
<del>theory</del> <add>image presented by this figure</add> that we must <add>apply ourselves</add> have recourse.  That the<lb/>
<del>power of the people should have be balanced</del> means<lb/>
<del>that</del> A balance is a machine composed of two<lb/>
beams or scales suspended from a beam resting on <del>the</del> <add>one part of its</add><lb/>
<del>middle</del> length commonly the middle upon an immoveable<lb/>
point called a fulcrum or pivot.  <del>That</del><lb/>
If no weight be on either scale such in this construction<lb/>
they will hang both of them upon a level,<lb/>
if a <add>the</add> weight be <del>then</del> placed on either that one on which<lb/>
it is placed will descend to a certain point <add>and the other scale ascend</add>:  if an<lb/>
equal weight be then placed on the <del>other</del> elevated<lb/>
scale that scale will descend, and the two scales<lb/>
will occupy the same level as before:  in this case<lb/>
as <del>the</del> without a weight on either the two scales <del>were</del><lb/>
said to balance each other, so will they with <del>a</del> <add>two</add><lb/>
weights they being equal weights – one on each.</p>
<p>Well then suppose the constitution a pair of scales<lb/>
in the first instance both empty:  in the next instance<lb/>
a mass of constitutive <add>original <gap/></add> powers lodged on that <add>one of the two</add> scales in<lb/>
which the <del>people are</del> metaphor has placed the people.<lb/>
Here then, <del>will be a proportion</del> on the part of them, in<lb/>
whose hands is lodged the supreme imperative and effective<lb/>
power will be as towards the people a proportional<lb/>
degree of dependence.  This according to the theory and<lb/>
correspondent <unclear>image</unclear> in question ought not to have place.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:45, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

14 June 1816
Political Deontology

A portion? Good: – but what portion?

For an answer The essence of this theory such as
it is, being to be found altogether solely in the metaphor figure of speech
to find an answer to the above question, it is to this the
theory image presented by this figure that we must apply ourselves have recourse. That the
power of the people should have be balanced means
that A balance is a machine composed of two
beams or scales suspended from a beam resting on the one part of its
middle length commonly the middle upon an immoveable
point called a fulcrum or pivot. That
If no weight be on either scale such in this construction
they will hang both of them upon a level,
if a the weight be then placed on either that one on which
it is placed will descend to a certain point and the other scale ascend: if an
equal weight be then placed on the other elevated
scale that scale will descend, and the two scales
will occupy the same level as before: in this case
as the without a weight on either the two scales were
said to balance each other, so will they with a two
weights they being equal weights – one on each.

Well then suppose the constitution a pair of scales
in the first instance both empty: in the next instance
a mass of constitutive original powers lodged on that one of the two scales in
which the people are metaphor has placed the people.
Here then, will be a proportion on the part of them, in
whose hands is lodged the supreme imperative and effective
power will be as towards the people a proportional
degree of dependence. This according to the theory and
correspondent image in question ought not to have place.


Identifier: | JB/015/035/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 15.

Date_1

1816-06-14

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

015

Main Headings

deontology

Folio number

035

Info in main headings field

political deontology

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

john dickinson & c<…> 1813

Marginals

Paper Producer

a. levy

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1813

Notes public

ID Number

5251

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in