★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
<head>Simple Personal Injuries</head> | <head>Simple Personal Injuries</head> | ||
< | <p><note>Example</note> <add>suppose</add> for instance <add>that</add> <add><del>suppose</del></add> <del>if</del> with a good intention <del>you have</del><lb/> | ||
in order to save the life of a person bitten<lb/> | |||
in the finger by a mad dog, you cut off the<lb/> | |||
finger against his will. <unclear>there.</unclear></p> | |||
<p>1. If the dog was not mad at the time he bit<lb/>the person's finger, this was a | <p>1. If the dog was not mad at the time he bit<lb/> | ||
the person's finger, this was a mistake respecting<lb/> | |||
the present matter of fact.</p> | |||
<p>2. <add>Surely</add>If<add> | <p>2. <add>Surely</add> If <add>immediate</add> amputation does not cure, or if a cure<lb/> | ||
might <del>be</del> for a certainty be effected at a cheaper<lb/> | |||
rate, either of these are mistakes concerning the<lb/> | |||
probable matter of fact</p> | |||
<p>3. If notwithstanding that the dog was mad at the<lb/>time and<add>the</add> amputation cures, and a cure could not<lb/>be effected at a cheaper rate the law <del>does not</del><lb/></p> | <p>3. If notwithstanding that the dog was mad at the<lb/> | ||
time and <add>the</add> amputation cures, and a cure could not<lb/> | |||
be effected at a cheaper rate the law <del>does not</del> <lb/> | |||
<del>establish</del> <add>admitted <del>if</del> not of</add> the concurrence of these circumstances as<lb/> | |||
a justification for cutting off a finger, this <add>would be</add> <del>is</del>a<lb/> | |||
mistake with regard to the matter of right.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
C
Simple Personal Injuries
Example suppose for instance that suppose if with a good intention you have
in order to save the life of a person bitten
in the finger by a mad dog, you cut off the
finger against his will. there.
1. If the dog was not mad at the time he bit
the person's finger, this was a mistake respecting
the present matter of fact.
2. Surely If immediate amputation does not cure, or if a cure
might be for a certainty be effected at a cheaper
rate, either of these are mistakes concerning the
probable matter of fact
3. If notwithstanding that the dog was mad at the
time and the amputation cures, and a cure could not
be effected at a cheaper rate the law does not
establish admitted if not of the concurrence of these circumstances as
a justification for cutting off a finger, this would be isa
mistake with regard to the matter of right.
|
Identifier: | JB/073/078/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 73. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
not numbered |
|||
|
073 |
law in general |
||
|
078 |
simple personal injuries |
||
|
002 |
|||
|
text sheet |
4 |
||
|
recto |
f1 / / / f4 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]] |
||
|
23918 |
|||
