JB/169/156/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/169/156/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>of The <del>two</del> pretty ladies <add>two</add> were for J.'s nieces, the two Miss Cramers<lb/>
<del>seem and</del><add>nor did </add> the epithet  seem<del>ed not altogether</del> inapplicable.  They<lb/>
seem not above a year or two older than his wife.  On entering the<lb/>
room &amp; found L<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> L. in the hands of<add>grappled with</add> another Lady, whom I<lb/>
imagined to be M. <foreign>de Polignac</foreign> or some other fair and illustrious<lb/>
refugee.  The <add>French</add> language <del>French</del>, <add>infinite volubility, and a reasonable measure of the pretension</add> and the names of Bruxelles and<lb/>
other <del>towns</del> <add>places</add> bordering in France first catching my ear scarce admitted<lb/>
of any other supposition.  It was Lady Caldwell, whose<lb/>
husband Sir John, nephew to S<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> J. Hart was also present <add>of the party</add>.<lb/>
<add>She proved an old acquaintance of mine</add> If you do not already know their history, L<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> L. of course will give<lb/>
it you.  When he had got <add>they were gone</add> loose from her he confessed himself quite<lb/>
fatigued - What a difference between Miss V.'s and Lady C. The<add>their</add> conversation<lb/>
is always a relief, <gap/> has been a fatigue to be one.  Though an<lb/>
intersting woman as you see, it is quite a tax <add>upon</add> <gap/> <gap/>to bath to her,<lb/>
the displaying of herself to him, he seemed<add>had before acknowledge, <gap/>ed likewise</add> sensible was a sort of<lb/>
tax upon her. If <add>the result of</add> a visit is to be a state of <unclear>mutual</unclear> <del><gap/>on</del><add>oppression</add>, no matter<lb/>
I should think how seldom it be repeated: [but her <add>part of the</add> tax.  I take it was<lb/>
of the number of those which people are not averse to pay.] but in her<lb/>
part I believe the tax did not meet with much reluctance.</p>
 






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:47, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

of The two pretty ladies two were for J.'s nieces, the two Miss Cramers
seem andnor did the epithet seemed not altogether inapplicable. They
seem not above a year or two older than his wife. On entering the
room & found Ld L. in the hands ofgrappled with another Lady, whom I
imagined to be M. de Polignac or some other fair and illustrious
refugee. The French language French, infinite volubility, and a reasonable measure of the pretension and the names of Bruxelles and
other towns places bordering in France first catching my ear scarce admitted
of any other supposition. It was Lady Caldwell, whose
husband Sir John, nephew to Sr J. Hart was also present of the party.
She proved an old acquaintance of mine If you do not already know their history, Ld L. of course will give
it you. When he had got they were gone loose from her he confessed himself quite
fatigued - What a difference between Miss V.'s and Lady C. Thetheir conversation
is always a relief, has been a fatigue to be one. Though an
intersting woman as you see, it is quite a tax upon to bath to her,
the displaying of herself to him, he seemedhad before acknowledge, ed likewise sensible was a sort of
tax upon her. If the result of a visit is to be a state of mutual onoppression, no matter
I should think how seldom it be repeated: [but her part of the tax. I take it was
of the number of those which people are not averse to pay.] but in her
part I believe the tax did not meet with much reluctance.




Identifier: | JB/169/156/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 169.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

169

Main Headings

Folio number

156

Info in main headings field

no 3

Image

001

Titles

Category

correspondence

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[fleur-de-lys motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

letter 683, vol. 4

ID Number

56976

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in