JB/169/249/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/169/249/003: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>to France, but whether he was any other than a well-wisher<lb/>
to his own country, &amp; in order to prove him so, an ill-wisher to a<lb/>
country must be defined to be &#x2014; one who braves all personal considerations<lb/>
in his zeal to save it.</p>
 
<p><del>
If M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Vaughan <hi rend="underline">had not been</hi> something of a well-wisher<lb/>
to France, I much question whether it would have been in his<lb/>
power to have appeared so much of a well-wisher to that country;<lb/>
as a man to give himself the smallest claim of being listened<lb/>
to by any country, must appear to be. For from all that I have<lb/>
ever had opportunity to observe, &amp; opportunities have not been<lb/>
wanting, M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Vaughan adds not only philanthrophy but sincerity<lb/>
to his other treasons.</del></p>
 
<p>I am admitting all this while that of which the contrary<lb/>
is evident &amp; undisputed &#x2014; that M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Vaughan had an intercourse<lb/>
with the enemy. How stands the fact? M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Vaughan's intercourse<lb/>
is with M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Stone, &amp; with M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Stone only. M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Stone's intercourse<lb/>
is with his Brother in France: &amp; it is the Brother, &amp; he only <lb/>
if I recollect right, that has any direct intercourse with any<lb/>
man who comes under the denomination of an enemy. In<lb/>
the correspondence of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Stone, of whom I know just nothing,<lb/>
there is a disguise which in the correspondence of any friend of<lb/>
mine with such a Country I should be much concerned to see.<lb/>
But in the communication made by M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Vaughan, there is nei-<lb/>
-ther disguise nor mystery. Having something of an acquaintance,<lb/>
as it appears, with M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Stone, who, as it appears, to his advantage<lb/>
of the slightest acquaintance to display his political importance,<lb/>
M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Vaughan, observing as he thinks, among the French<lb/>
symptoms of a disposition to take advice from any man whom<lb/>
French Vanity &amp; presumption can find a pretence for numbering<lb/>
among their well-wishers, thinks this a good opportunity of<lb/>
conveying reasons to them against an enterprise, which, how<lb/>
rashly &amp; foolishly soever conducted on the part of <hi rend="underline">that</hi> country,<lb/>
<add>would</add></p>
 






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:47, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

to France, but whether he was any other than a well-wisher
to his own country, & in order to prove him so, an ill-wisher to a
country must be defined to be — one who braves all personal considerations
in his zeal to save it.

If Mr Vaughan had not been something of a well-wisher
to France, I much question whether it would have been in his
power to have appeared so much of a well-wisher to that country;
as a man to give himself the smallest claim of being listened
to by any country, must appear to be. For from all that I have
ever had opportunity to observe, & opportunities have not been
wanting, Mr Vaughan adds not only philanthrophy but sincerity
to his other treasons.

I am admitting all this while that of which the contrary
is evident & undisputed — that Mr Vaughan had an intercourse
with the enemy. How stands the fact? Mr Vaughan's intercourse
is with Mr Stone, & with Mr Stone only. Mr Stone's intercourse
is with his Brother in France: & it is the Brother, & he only
if I recollect right, that has any direct intercourse with any
man who comes under the denomination of an enemy. In
the correspondence of Mr Stone, of whom I know just nothing,
there is a disguise which in the correspondence of any friend of
mine with such a Country I should be much concerned to see.
But in the communication made by Mr Vaughan, there is nei-
-ther disguise nor mystery. Having something of an acquaintance,
as it appears, with Mr Stone, who, as it appears, to his advantage
of the slightest acquaintance to display his political importance,
Mr Vaughan, observing as he thinks, among the French
symptoms of a disposition to take advice from any man whom
French Vanity & presumption can find a pretence for numbering
among their well-wishers, thinks this a good opportunity of
conveying reasons to them against an enterprise, which, how
rashly & foolishly soever conducted on the part of that country,
would




Identifier: | JB/169/249/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 169.

Date_1

1796-02-15

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

169

Main Headings

Folio number

249

Info in main headings field

Image

003

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

57069

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in