★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
'' | <p><note><!-- note in pencil -->6<lb/> | ||
2. It would<lb/> | |||
put the <gap/><lb/> | |||
<gap/> <gap/><lb/> | |||
against peculation</note><lb/> | |||
Neither could <del>a contract the mode of contract</del> <add>the contract made</add> be depended<lb/> | |||
upon as shutting the door absolutely against<lb/> | |||
peculation. <del>It</del> In any building undertaking it is<lb/> | |||
<del>not very common</del> rather <add>rare</add> I believe than otherwise<lb/> | |||
for the <del>first</del> <add>original</add> contract to be adhered to without any<lb/> | |||
variation: as the building advances, occasions for<lb/> | |||
making additions or alterations present themselves:<lb/> | |||
<del>thus if for the purpose of</del> <add>as far as</add> these alterations <add>extend</add> the<lb/> | |||
proprietor, if no <del>fresh</del> contract is made, is <add>then</add> at the<lb/> | |||
mercy of the builder: and in the making of such<lb/> | |||
<add>fresh</add> contract, the builder will be apt to take his advantage<lb/> | |||
in proportion to the degree in which <add>he supposes</add> the proprietor<lb/> | |||
<add>to</add> have the alteration at heart. A building of so new<lb/> | |||
<add>a kind <del>must</del> seems more particularly <del><unclear>expand</unclear></del> <add><del>apt</del></add> to able to<lb/> | |||
afford occasion for such changes.</add></p> | |||
<p><note><!-- note in pencil -->7<lb/> | |||
<gap/><lb/> | |||
1. <gap/><lb/> | |||
the architect<lb/> | |||
<gap/></note><lb/> | |||
Your objection against allowing an <del>per cent</del><lb/> | |||
unlimited per centage to the architect on the amount<lb/> | |||
of the expenditure I feel in its full force: it is giving<lb/> | |||
a premium on profusion. <del>Would not the objection</del> <add>To <del><gap/></del> take away</add><lb/> | |||
<del>be removed by making the architect pay a limited</del> <add>the temptation, <add>why not</add> fix the recompense whatever be the expenditure</add><lb/> | |||
<del>sum for the whole?</del> <del>Suppose the sum allotted <add>£</add> <gap/></del>,<lb/> | |||
000: <del>so much per cent <gap/> 5</del> <add>Upon this sum, 5 per cent</add> for example (£500)<lb/> | |||
<del><gap/></del> you shall have at any rate but <del>if</del> <add>should</add> the expenditure<lb/> | |||
exceed that sum you shall have no more: <del>unless</del><lb/> | |||
<del><unclear>and</unclear></del> only if additions should <add>come to</add> be made <add>by our order</add> to an amount<lb/> | |||
at present <del>unexpected</del> <add>unlooked for,</add> you may then expect, though<lb/> | |||
at our 'discretion', an increase of <sic>recompence</sic>. <add>It</add><lb/> | |||
<note>Settle the general<lb/> | |||
plan first with<lb/> | |||
the Architect<lb/> | |||
and hear his<lb/> | |||
estimate - <del>then</del> <add>without</add><lb/> | |||
<del>say to him</del> <add>his <unclear>suspicions</unclear> you</add><lb/> | |||
mean to engage with him<lb/> | |||
Suppose it<lb/> | |||
£10,000. Then<lb/> | |||
say to him</note></p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
6
2. It would
put the
against peculation
Neither could a contract the mode of contract the contract made be depended
upon as shutting the door absolutely against
peculation. It In any building undertaking it is
not very common rather rare I believe than otherwise
for the first original contract to be adhered to without any
variation: as the building advances, occasions for
making additions or alterations present themselves:
thus if for the purpose of as far as these alterations extend the
proprietor, if no fresh contract is made, is then at the
mercy of the builder: and in the making of such
fresh contract, the builder will be apt to take his advantage
in proportion to the degree in which he supposes the proprietor
to have the alteration at heart. A building of so new
a kind must seems more particularly expand <add>apt to able to
afford occasion for such changes.</add>
7
1.
the architect
Your objection against allowing an per cent
unlimited per centage to the architect on the amount
of the expenditure I feel in its full force: it is giving
a premium on profusion. Would not the objection To take away
be removed by making the architect pay a limited the temptation, <add>why not fix the recompense whatever be the expenditure</add>
sum for the whole? Suppose the sum allotted £ ,
000: so much per cent 5 Upon this sum, 5 per cent for example (£500)
you shall have at any rate but if should the expenditure
exceed that sum you shall have no more: unless
and only if additions should come to be made by our order to an amount
at present unexpected unlooked for, you may then expect, though
at our 'discretion', an increase of recompence. It
Settle the general
plan first with
the Architect
and hear his
estimate - then without
say to him his suspicions you
mean to engage with him
Suppose it
£10,000. Then
say to him
|
Identifier: | JB/117/045/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 117. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
5-7 |
|||
|
117 |
panopticon |
||
|
045a"a" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 45. |
|||
|
002 |
|||
|
correspondence |
2 |
||
|
recto |
f3 / f4 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[britannia with shield emblem]]] |
||
|
draft of letter 714, vol. 4 |
38662 |
||
