JB/096/001/004: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/096/001/004: Difference between revisions

Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:




<p><add>in voluntary manner, another question arises &#x2014; of what use are these learned commentaries? When <unclear>Newhom</unclear> explained the Laws of Gravitation<!-- number 2 above the letter i? --> &amp; optics<!-- number 1 above letter p? -->, he did not do it for the sake of <del>the</del> Light, or Matter <add>Bodies</add>; he did not mean to direct their motions: Before he wrote: the rays of Light were reflected &amp; refracted, the just as they are now<del>hen as now</del> <add>now: &#x2014; then as now</add>  Bodies gravitated: <del>then as now</del>, they <del>And they</del> would have continued <add>so</add> to do, had he never written at all.  And if, <add>the direction of</add> our moral conduct be <del>directed</del> as little in our own power, as the motion of inanimate matter is in <hi rend='underline'>it's</hi> power, what occasion for a system of Laws?  why does the learned professor take so much pains to prove a conformity, which <add>(by the way)</add> does not exist, between the laws of England &amp; the laws of God?  And that conformity supposed why is he so eloquent in enforcing obedience to <del>him?</del> these Laws?  This is all <sic>labor</sic> lost, if man is necessitated to obey the Laws of his Creator, in the same manner as the hand of a watch is forced to describe a given space in a given time in consequence of the degree of moving force communicated by the maker<!-- or, master? -->.  &#x2014; Saint Anthony preaching to the fishes would be to the full <add>as consisted<!-- or, consistent? --></add> as respectable a Character as a Legislator prescribing or a professor explaining Laws to such a Being as this. &#x2014;</add> "dependent Being".  And again, "that a State
<p>
dependent Being".  And again, "that a State <add>in voluntary manner, another question arises &#x2014; of what use are these learned commentaries? When Newton explained</add>
<lb/>
<lb/>
"of dependance, will inevitably oblige the
"of dependance, will inevitably oblige the <add>the Laws of Gravitation<!-- number 2 above the letter i? --> &amp; Optics<!-- number 1 above letter p? -->, he did not do it for the sake of <del>the</del> Light, or Matter <add>Bodies</add>; he did not mean to <hi rend='underline'>direct</hi> their motions:</add>
<lb/>
<lb/>
"inferior to take the will of him, on whom he
"inferior to take the will of him, on whom he <add>Before he wrote: the rays of Light were reflected &amp; refracted, the just as they are now <del>then as now</del> <add>now: &#x2014; then as now</add>  Bodies gravitated: <del>then as now</del>, they </add>
<lb/>
<lb/>
"depends, as the rule of his conduct, in all
"depends, as the rule of his conduct, in all <add><del>And they</del> would have continued <add>so</add> to do, had he never written at all. And if, <add>the direction of</add> our moral conduct be <del>directed</del> as little in our own power,</add>
<lb/>
<lb/>
"those points, where in his dependance consists: &#x2014;
"those points, where in his dependance consists: &#x2014; <add>as the motion of inanimate matter is in <hi rend='underline'><sic>it's</sic></hi> power, what occasion for a system of Laws? why does the learned professor take so</add>
<lb/>
<lb/>
"and, consequently, as man depends absolutely
"and, consequently, as man depends absolutely <add>much pains to prove a conformity, which <add>(by the way)</add> does not exist, between the laws of England &amp; the laws of God?  And that conformity</add>
<lb/>
<lb/>
"upon his maker for every thing, it is necessary
"upon his maker for every thing, it is necessary <add>supposed why is he so eloquent in enforcing obedience to <del>them</del> these Laws? This is all <sic>labor</sic> lost, if man is necessitated to</add>
<lb/>
<lb/>
"that he should in all points conform to his &#x2014;
"that he should in all points conform to his &#x2014; <add>obey the Laws of his Creator, in the same manner as the hand of a watch is forced to describe a given space in a given</add>
<lb/>
<lb/>
"maker's will". <del>He</del></p>
"maker's will". <del>He</del> <add>time in consequence of the degree of moving force communicated by the <unclear>master</unclear>. &#x2014;</add></p>
<p>Now, if there be any meaning in words, all
<p>Now, if there be any meaning in words, all <add>Saint Anthony preaching to the fishes would be to the full <add>as consistent<!-- or, consistent? --></add> as respectable a Character</add>
<lb/>
<lb/>
this must signify, that the moral conduct of a
this must signify, that the moral conduct of a <add>as a Legislator prescribing or a professor explaining</add>
<lb/>
<lb/>
<del>man is no more left to his own will, than &#x2014;  
man is no more left to his own will, than &#x2014; <add>Laws to such a Being as this. &#x2014;</add>
<lb/>
<lb/>
digestion, secretion, or any other branch of vital
digestion, secretion, or any other branch of vital
<lb/>
<lb/>
œconomy<!-- ligature -->: but is directed in the same involuntary<lb/></del></P>
oeconomy<!-- ligature -->: but is directed in the same involuntary</p>
 
       
<head>4</head>
<head>4</head>
<!-- what appears to be an 'I' written in the bottom right margin.  Use as a note/addition?  If so, where? --><note>I</note>
 




Line 43: Line 46:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:11, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit


dependent Being". And again, "that a State in voluntary manner, another question arises — of what use are these learned commentaries? When Newton explained
"of dependance, will inevitably oblige the the Laws of Gravitation & Optics, he did not do it for the sake of the Light, or Matter <add>Bodies; he did not mean to direct their motions:</add>
"inferior to take the will of him, on whom he Before he wrote: the rays of Light were reflected & refracted, the just as they are now then as now <add>now: — then as now Bodies gravitated: then as now, they </add>
"depends, as the rule of his conduct, in all And they would have continued <add>so to do, had he never written at all. And if, the direction of our moral conduct be directed as little in our own power,</add>
"those points, where in his dependance consists: — as the motion of inanimate matter is in it's power, what occasion for a system of Laws? why does the learned professor take so
"and, consequently, as man depends absolutely much pains to prove a conformity, which <add>(by the way) does not exist, between the laws of England & the laws of God? And that conformity</add>
"upon his maker for every thing, it is necessary supposed why is he so eloquent in enforcing obedience to them these Laws? This is all labor lost, if man is necessitated to
"that he should in all points conform to his — obey the Laws of his Creator, in the same manner as the hand of a watch is forced to describe a given space in a given
"maker's will". He time in consequence of the degree of moving force communicated by the master. —

Now, if there be any meaning in words, all Saint Anthony preaching to the fishes would be to the full <add>as consistent as respectable a Character</add>
this must signify, that the moral conduct of a as a Legislator prescribing or a professor explaining
man is no more left to his own will, than — Laws to such a Being as this. —
digestion, secretion, or any other branch of vital
oeconomy: but is directed in the same involuntary


4








Identifier: | JB/096/001/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

096

Main Headings

comment on the commentaries

Folio number

001

Info in main headings field

Image

004

Titles

section i / account of laws in general

Category

collectanea

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1 f1 / c2 / c3 / c4

Penner

168

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [quartered royal arms motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

31005

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in