JB/096/057/004: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/096/057/004: Difference between revisions

Suemac (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


Sect. III. Divine Law.
<head>Sect. III. Divine Law.   <hi rend='superscript'>(3</hi></head>
'to man's felicity." This original Law of Nature <lb/> God "has enabled human reason to discover  
 
"so far as it is necessary for the conduct of hu-<lb/>"man actions". " Not that we are to conclude
<p>"to man's felicity." This original Law of Nature <lb/> God "has enabled Human Reason to discover <lb/><note> p 40</note> "so far as it is necessary for the conduct of human<lb/>
"that the knowledge of these writers"(the writers that form this
actions." " Not that we are to conclude<lb/>
part of it) " was attachable by reason, in its
"that the knowledge of these truths"(<del>that <gap/> </del> <add>the truths that form</add> this<lb/> part of it)" was attainable by reason, in <sic>it's</sic><lb/>
"present corrupted state". How should it be that "until
"present corrupted state." How should <del>they</del> <add>it be</add>?  "until<lb/>
"they were revealed they were hid".
"they were <hi rend='underline'>revealed</hi> they were <hi rend='underline'>hid</hi>".</p>
The consequence of all this is, that as these pre-
 
uphold doctrines to (which we now find worth the
<p>The consequence of all this is, that <add>as</add> these precepts' <lb/>
... "moral for some purpose or other clapped?? to before them) "are
doctrines to (which <add>we</add> now find worth the<lb/>
"of the same original ("indeed" of the same origi
epithet <hi rend='underline'>"moral"</hi> <add>for some purpose or other</add> clapped to <del>[before]</del> them) "are<lb/>
-nal) as " themselves and the rest of that which is "the Law of nature; so their intensive/intrusive?? ob
"of the same original ("<hi rend='underline'>indeed</hi>" of the same original)<lb/>
"-ligation is of equal strength and perpelexity??".
as "themselves and the rest of that which<lb/>
"Yet are they ", yes 'undoubtedly" are they "of
is "the Law of nature; so their intrusive obligation "is of equal strength and perpetuity".<lb/>
"infinitely more authenticity than" "the Natural
"Yet are they ", yes 'undoubtedly" are they "of<lb/>
"Law", which, all the while this sentence starts,
"infinitely more authenticity than" "the Natural<lb/>
and the ..st to it, is to ensure than or sort
"Law", which, <del>as long as</del> <add>all the while</add> this sentence lasts,<lb/>
of a thing called "a moral system, framed
and the next to it, is no more than a sort<lb/>
"by Ethical writers".
of a thing called "a moral System, framed <lb/>"by Ethical writers".</p>
The reason is plain. The Natural Law, is
 
not the natural Law but a some??thing "which  
<p>The reason is plain. The Natural Law, is <lb/>not the natural Law but a <sic>somthing</sic>  "which <lb/>we <hi rend='underline'>imagine</hi>" to be such, taking human reason<lb/>
we imagine" to be such, taking human reason
(like a Constable, or rather like a feeble<lb/>
(like a Constable, or rather like a ...
emaciated, bully-beaten  Watchman with<p>
..ted, fully-beaten  Wate??man?? with
 




''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:11, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

Sect. III. Divine Law. (3

"to man's felicity." This original Law of Nature
God "has enabled Human Reason to discover
p 40 "so far as it is necessary for the conduct of human
actions." " Not that we are to conclude
"that the knowledge of these truths"(that the truths that form this
part of it)" was attainable by reason, in it's
"present corrupted state." How should they it be? "until
"they were revealed they were hid".

The consequence of all this is, that as these precepts'
doctrines to (which we now find worth the
epithet "moral" for some purpose or other clapped to [before] them) "are
"of the same original ("indeed" of the same original)
as "themselves and the rest of that which
is "the Law of nature; so their intrusive obligation "is of equal strength and perpetuity".
"Yet are they ", yes 'undoubtedly" are they "of
"infinitely more authenticity than" "the Natural
"Law", which, as long as all the while this sentence lasts,
and the next to it, is no more than a sort
of a thing called "a moral System, framed
"by Ethical writers".

The reason is plain. The Natural Law, is
not the natural Law but a somthing "which
we imagine" to be such, taking human reason
(like a Constable, or rather like a feeble
emaciated, bully-beaten Watchman with

Identifier: | JB/096/057/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

096

Main Headings

comment on the commentaries

Folio number

057

Info in main headings field

sect. ii law of nature sect. iii divine law

Image

004

Titles

inserenda

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f13 / d1 / f2 / d3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [lion with crown motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

31061

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in