JB/150/403/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/150/403/001: Difference between revisions

David (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<note>Police Report 4</note>
<!-- The page is ruled into five columns.  The text in the three right hand columns appears to be the main text, with the contents of the two left hand columns added subsequently.  <!-- pencil annotation  -->  


<gap/><lb/><gap/><lb/> quantity of punishment <lb/> in question being so much  <lb/> greater: and <lb/><lb/>through the power of acquittal...by the ..., yet the <lb/> power of discharging is, <lb/> which in the instance <lb/> of
<head>Police Report 4</head>
<lb/><lb/><lb/> comes much the same thing. It is <lb/> difficult therefore to my <lb/> <lb/><lb/> Book <lb/> keeping and publication <lb/> would be of the most use. The <lb/> publication of the name of the delinquent would in many cases be of <gap/><lb/> but <gap/>a punishment. <lb/> But yet might easily be <lb/>avoided.


SECOND COLUMN
<p> <del> Instrument</del> <add><del> or introductory </del> <add><del>of the <gap/> <gap/> </del><add>a preparation</add><add> : the power <add><del>a</del></add> of conviction or acquittal<lb/> being referred to a tribunal of a higher<lb/> or more complex nature &#x2014; usually a Judge<lb/> and Jury.  In this <add> It is in </add> better class of cases, though <lb/> <add>the power is <del>bi</del> less absolute, the business is most important:</add> [+] <!-- although not marked [+] the adjoining text in the left hand column appears to be added here  --> <note> the supposed magnitude<lb/> of the delinquency, and<lb/> the quantity of punishment<lb/> in question being so much<lb/> greater: and even in these<lb/> cases though the power of<lb/> acquittal <add> <hi rend="underline"><gap/> <gap/></hi> </add> is not possessed<lb/> by the Magistrate, yet the<lb/> power of discharging is,<lb/> which in the instance<lb/> of persons of mean account,<lb/> that is the great <del>bulk</del> <add> multitude</add> of<lb/> persons falling under examination,<lb/> comes much to the same thing.  It is<lb/> difficult therefore to say<lb/> in which of the two classes<lb/> of cases <del> probably would<lb/> be of most regular</del> <add> a regular system of </add> Book<lb/> keeping and publication<lb/> would be of most use.  The<lb/> publication of the name<lb/> of the delinquent would<lb/> in many cases be of itself<lb/> but too severe a punishment.<lb/>  But this might be avoided.</note></p>


<gap/>
<p> Of the heads of expense arising out of all <lb/> these several stages one and one only has <lb/> happened to come in its full extent under<lb/> the cognizance of Your Committee.  This <lb/> is that of Rewards payable <del> by either</del> <add> on </add> <lb/> conviction of Felons.  Being paid by Sheriffs<lb/> and allowed in their accounts, which in <lb/> every instance pass through the Exchequer, <lb/> they are thence received in the Exchequer,<lb/> and having been required from thence, have <lb/> been returned to your Committee. This was <lb/> among the heads <del> r</del> included in a return<lb/>of heads of expenditure in the account <lb/> of Convicts, made up principally of the expense<lb/> <del> of punishment <add> belonging to the</add> </del> in <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi>  <note> [+] resulting from the<lb/> two systems of punishment<lb/> established<lb/> on board</note> the Hulks and <lb/> in New South Wales.</p> <!-- pencil annotation in margin --> <p> <note> <del>6</del> 7<lb/> Expense of rewards<lb/> for evidence. Comparative <lb/> expense of<lb/> the last period of <lb/> 11 years and the <lb/> last but one.</note> </p>
 
: to know of conviciton or ac- <lb/> -quittal being <gap/><lb/> or more complex nature  &#x2014; usually a judge <lb/> and Jury. In the latter class of cases, though <lb/> the power <gap/> the business is most important: <lb/> <gap/> arising <gap/><lb/> those several stages one?  and one?  only has <lb/> happened to some in the full <gap/>under <lb/> the ignorance of your Committee. This <lb/> is that of Awards
 
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''


<p> A return which <add> of this sort</add> had been made to a former<lb/> House of Commons for a period of eleven years<lb/> ending in 1786 suggested to Your Committee<lb/> the obtaining a <del> <gap/> </del> correspondent return<lb/> for an equal period of Years ending <del>in</del> <add> with</add> the <add> for the period of 12 years that has elapsed between that </add> <lb/> <add> time and the end of the </add> last year 1797. <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> <note>[+] Omitting the last year for<lb/> the purpose of obtaining a<lb/> period of 11 years to compare<lb/> with the preceding period of 11 years.</note> The total of the sums <lb/> paid on account of rewards for the conviction of <lb/> Felons in the former period of eleven years, <lb/> is £89,150: the total for the latter period, <lb/> £88,470.  The similarity is remarkable: <lb/> and it affords some satisfaction to observe that <lb/> the difference is rather on the side of diminution<lb/> than increase.</p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:43, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit


Police Report 4

Instrument or introductory <add>of the <add>a preparation : the power <add>a of conviction or acquittal
being referred to a tribunal of a higher
or more complex nature — usually a Judge
and Jury. In this It is in better class of cases, though
the power is bi less absolute, the business is most important: [+] the supposed magnitude
of the delinquency, and
the quantity of punishment
in question being so much
greater: and even in these
cases though the power of
acquittal is not possessed
by the Magistrate, yet the
power of discharging is,
which in the instance
of persons of mean account,
that is the great bulk multitude of
persons falling under examination,
comes much to the same thing. It is
difficult therefore to say
in which of the two classes
of cases probably would
be of most regular
a regular system of Book
keeping and publication
would be of most use. The
publication of the name
of the delinquent would
in many cases be of itself
but too severe a punishment.
But this might be avoided.

Of the heads of expense arising out of all
these several stages one and one only has
happened to come in its full extent under
the cognizance of Your Committee. This
is that of Rewards payable by either on
conviction of Felons. Being paid by Sheriffs
and allowed in their accounts, which in
every instance pass through the Exchequer,
they are thence received in the Exchequer,
and having been required from thence, have
been returned to your Committee. This was
among the heads r included in a return
of heads of expenditure in the account
of Convicts, made up principally of the expense
of punishment belonging to the in [+] [+] resulting from the
two systems of punishment
established
on board
the Hulks and
in New South Wales.

6 7
Expense of rewards
for evidence. Comparative
expense of
the last period of
11 years and the
last but one.

A return which of this sort had been made to a former
House of Commons for a period of eleven years
ending in 1786 suggested to Your Committee
the obtaining a correspondent return
for an equal period of Years ending in with the for the period of 12 years that has elapsed between that
time and the end of the last year 1797. [+] [+] Omitting the last year for
the purpose of obtaining a
period of 11 years to compare
with the preceding period of 11 years.
The total of the sums
paid on account of rewards for the conviction of
Felons in the former period of eleven years,
is £89,150: the total for the latter period,
£88,470. The similarity is remarkable:
and it affords some satisfaction to observe that
the difference is rather on the side of diminution
than increase.



Identifier: | JB/150/403/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

7

Box

150

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales; police bill

Folio number

403

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

b4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

50624

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in