JB/096/032/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/096/032/003: Difference between revisions

Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
<p><note>To be copied</note> declares it to be in direct opposition to
<p><note>To be copied</note> declares it to be in direct opposition to
<lb/>  
<lb/>  
his present distinction) then it is in <foreign>ex
his present distinction) then it is in <foreign>ex</foreign>
<lb/>  
<lb/>  
post facto</foreign> law, making that criminal
<foreign>post facto</foreign> law, making that criminal
<lb/>
<lb/>
which at the time of <sic>it's</sic> commission was
which at the time of <sic>it's</sic> commission was
Line 17: Line 17:
with a spirit, which I wish he had imparted
with a spirit, which I wish he had imparted
<lb/>  
<lb/>  
to our author, <!-- foreign text checked on google.  See: http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=Nemo+unquam+tulit+nihil+est+crudelius+nihil+perni+ciofius+nihil+quod+minus+hoc+civitas+ferre+possit&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&client=firefox-a#sclient=psy&hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB%3Aofficial&q=Nemo+unquam+tulit+nihil+est+crudelius+nihil+perniciosius+nihil+quod+minus+hoc+civitas+ferre+possit&aq=&aqi=&aql=&oq=Nemo+unquam+tulit+nihil+est+crudelius+nihil+perniciosius+nihil+quod+minus+hoc+civitas+ferre+possit&gs_rfai=&pbx=1&fp=8d8451eb556d4e24  > The word hoc in sic tags is incorrect according to the latin quotation of Cicero checked on google.  -->"<foreign>Nemo unquam
to our author, "<foreign>Nemo unquam
<lb/>
<lb/>
"tulit, nihil est crudelius, nihil perniciosius,  
"tulit, nihil est crudelius, nihil perniciosius,  
Line 34: Line 34:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:11, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit


To be copied declares it to be in direct opposition to
his present distinction) then it is in ex
post facto law, making that criminal
which at the time of it's commission was
indifferent: it is a privilegium of which
Cicero, as quoted by our Author, says —
with a spirit, which I wish he had imparted
to our author, "Nemo unquam
"tulit, nihil est crudelius, nihil perniciosius,
nihil quod minus hoc civitas
"ferre possit."

["Municipal law (says our Author) Vol.I. P.45
"is also a rule of civil conduct, and this
"he says distinguishes municipal law

82




Identifier: | JB/096/032/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

096

Main Headings

comment on the commentaries

Folio number

032

Info in main headings field

Image

003

Titles

Category

collectanea

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c80 / c81 / c82 / c83

Penner

168

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [quartered royal arms motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

[[notes_public::"to be copied" [note not in bentham's hand]]]

ID Number

31036

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in