JB/095/069/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/095/069/001: Difference between revisions

Oleblanc (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:


<head>Observations continued.</head>
<head>Observations continued.</head>
<p>The <unclear><hi rend='underline'>quantum</hi></unclear> of a qualification is <del><add>capable of being</add></del> limitable <!-- clearly changed from limited to limitable --> to exactness on the side of <!-- come back to it --> by the number<lb/> of qualified persons to be found: a fact capable of being established, <unclear>&amp;</unclear> which when established, cuts<lb/> off all dispute<unclear>!</unclear> It is altogether otherwise on that of <hi rend='underline'><gap/></hi>; on that side, <del><gap/></del> arguments <gap/><lb/> shall point <del><gap/></del> to any certain degree in the scale in exclusion of the rest, <unclear>are</unclear> what it is plainly<lb/> not in the nature of the subject to afford. What exact fortune shall be sufficient to <del><gap/></del><add>fortify</add> a <gap/><lb/> against the temptations to which the office may expose him, or to serve as a presumption of his possession,<lb/> the talents of entertaining the sentiments required for it, are questions that must ever be abandoned to<lb/> conjecture.</p>
 
<p>The 2<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> of these problems, to judge of facility by success, is far from being the easiest in the science to<lb/> resolve with accuracy. The names for the several divisions of property, however familiar they may<lb/> have become<unclear>,</unclear> by use, are unhappily, as we have already seen in one instance, so tainted with <gap/><!-- equivocality??? --><lb/> as to be unfit for it; and those which might be substituted in the <unclear>room</unclear> of them, should they<lb/> even be <unclear>universal</unclear> and determinate, would, for a time at least, <del><gap/></del> <add>appear</add> obscure for want of being familiar.<lb/> For all this there is no other remedy than <hi rend='underline'>definition</hi>; that capital expedient of legislative<lb/> discourse, so highly needed, &amp; so little used.</p>
<p>The <hi rend='underline'>quantum</hi> of a qualification is <del><add>capable of being</add></del> limitable <!-- clearly changed from limited to limitable --> to exactness on the side of <hi rend='underline'>increase</hi> by the number
<p>For the purpose of the 3<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> of them, in this and most other Qualification Acts 2 separate sanctions<lb/> are provided; the one, <unclear>civil</unclear> <unclear>&#x2014;</unclear> a penalty; the other <hi rend='underline'>religious</hi> (as it is <gap/>cially termed) an oath.<lb/> On this occasion, it may be asked (since i<del>deleted text</del>t seems it has been asked, why not trust to the ordinary<lb/> sanction of the civil penalty. To this question, as it is of considerable <unclear>extent</unclear> &amp; importance, I will endeavour<lb/> to <add>give an</add> answer on behalf of the law.</p>
<lb/>  
<p>In order to <unclear>give</unclear> to any Law its' effect against those who disobey it, it is necessary <sic>than</sic> some person<lb/> or other should be found to put it in <unclear>motion</unclear>, who, if, as here, he have no special interest already<lb/> to stimulate him to enforce it as a <hi rend='underline'>party grieved</hi>, must have it given to him in character of<lb/> informer. Now so <del><unclear>odious</unclear></del> <add>invidious</add> is that character, &amp;, in the eyes of most men (fearful not without reason of<lb/> plunging <unclear>into</unclear> the unknown gulph of litigation) <del><gap/></del> so precarious the profit of assuming it; that this <del><gap/></del><lb/> motive of itself</p>
of qualified persons to be found: a fact capable of being established, &amp; which when established, cuts
<lb/>  
off all dispute<unclear>!</unclear> It is altogether otherwise on that of <hi rend='underline'>diminution</hi>; on that side, <del>any such</del> arguments <del>that</del>
<lb/>  
shall point <del><gap/></del> to any certain degree in the scale in exclusion of the rest, are what it is plainly
<lb/>  
not in the nature of the subject to afford. <!-- blank space --> What exact fortune shall be sufficient to <del>exempt</del> <add>fortify</add> a man
<lb/>  
against the temptations to which the office may expose him, or to serve as a presumption of his possessing<lb/> the talents &amp; entertaining the sentiments required for it, are questions that must ever be abandoned to
<lb/> conjecture.</p>
 
<p>The 2<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> of these problems, to judge of facility by success, is far from being the easiest in the science to
<lb/>  
resolve with accuracy. <!-- Blank space --> The names for the several divisions of property, however familiar they may
<lb/>  
have become<unclear>,</unclear> by use, are unhappily, as we have already seen in one instance, so tainted with equivocality
<lb/>  
as to be unfit for it; and those which might be substituted in the room of them, should they
<lb/>  
even be univocal and determinate, would, for a time at least, <del>be</del> <add>appear</add> obscure for want of being familiar.
<lb/>
<!-- Blank space --> For all this there is no other remedy than <hi rend='underline'>definition</hi>; that capital expedient of legislative
<lb/>  
discourse, so highly needed, &amp; so little used.</p>
 
<p>For the purpose of the 3<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> of them, in this and most other Qualification Acts 2 separate sanctions
<lb/>  
are provided; the one, civil &#x2014; a penalty; the other <hi rend='underline'>religious</hi> (as it is usually termed) an oath.
<lb/>  
On this occasion, it may be asked (since it seems it has been asked, why not trust to the ordinary
<lb/>  
sanction of the civil penalty. To this question, as it is of considerable extent &amp; importance, I will endeavour
<lb/>  
to <add>give an</add> answer on behalf of the law.</p>
 
<p>In order to give to any Law <sic>its'</sic> effect against those who disobey it, it is necessary <sic>than</sic> some person
<lb/>  
or other should be found to put it in motion, who, if, as here, he have no special interest already
<lb/>  
to stimulate him to enforce it as a <hi rend='underline'>party grieved</hi>, must have it given to him in character of
<lb/>  
informer. Now so <del>odious</del> <add>invidious</add> is that character, &amp;, in the eyes of most men (fearful not without reason of
<lb/>  
plunging in the unknown gulph of litigation) <del><gap/></del> so precarious the profit of assuming it; that this <del>expedient</del>
<lb/>
motive of itself might prove a weak dependance. The business is therefore is to find some means to
<lb/>
strengthen it; &amp; these means are to be met with in an oath.</p>
 
<p>In proof of this one may it is to be hoped without any very extravagant compliment to human
<lb/>
nature venture to suppose that there are many persons who, sensible of the considerations that
<lb/>
have been alledged, would for the sake <del><gap/></del> of getting into an office run the hazard of the penalty;
<lb/>
who yet would not run such lengths for it, as over and above that penalty to incur the peril
<lb/>
and the guilt of Perjury. <!-- Blank space --> The number of such persons is the measure of the accession of strength
<lb/>
which the provision derives from this expedient.</p>
 
<p>But it's utility as a bare sanction is not it's only utility: it is in the nature of it to forward
<lb/>  
the enforcement of the other against those delinquents whose temerity it was itself insufficient
<lb/>
to restrain</p>
 


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:11, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

Observations continued.

The quantum of a qualification is capable of being limitable to exactness on the side of increase by the number
of qualified persons to be found: a fact capable of being established, & which when established, cuts
off all dispute! It is altogether otherwise on that of diminution; on that side, any such arguments that
shall point to any certain degree in the scale in exclusion of the rest, are what it is plainly
not in the nature of the subject to afford. What exact fortune shall be sufficient to exempt fortify a man
against the temptations to which the office may expose him, or to serve as a presumption of his possessing
the talents & entertaining the sentiments required for it, are questions that must ever be abandoned to
conjecture.

The 2d of these problems, to judge of facility by success, is far from being the easiest in the science to
resolve with accuracy. The names for the several divisions of property, however familiar they may
have become, by use, are unhappily, as we have already seen in one instance, so tainted with equivocality
as to be unfit for it; and those which might be substituted in the room of them, should they
even be univocal and determinate, would, for a time at least, be appear obscure for want of being familiar.
For all this there is no other remedy than definition; that capital expedient of legislative
discourse, so highly needed, & so little used.

For the purpose of the 3d of them, in this and most other Qualification Acts 2 separate sanctions
are provided; the one, civil — a penalty; the other religious (as it is usually termed) an oath.
On this occasion, it may be asked (since it seems it has been asked, why not trust to the ordinary
sanction of the civil penalty. To this question, as it is of considerable extent & importance, I will endeavour
to give an answer on behalf of the law.

In order to give to any Law its' effect against those who disobey it, it is necessary than some person
or other should be found to put it in motion, who, if, as here, he have no special interest already
to stimulate him to enforce it as a party grieved, must have it given to him in character of
informer. Now so odious invidious is that character, &, in the eyes of most men (fearful not without reason of
plunging in the unknown gulph of litigation) so precarious the profit of assuming it; that this expedient
motive of itself might prove a weak dependance. The business is therefore is to find some means to
strengthen it; & these means are to be met with in an oath.

In proof of this one may it is to be hoped without any very extravagant compliment to human
nature venture to suppose that there are many persons who, sensible of the considerations that
have been alledged, would for the sake of getting into an office run the hazard of the penalty;
who yet would not run such lengths for it, as over and above that penalty to incur the peril
and the guilt of Perjury. The number of such persons is the measure of the accession of strength
which the provision derives from this expedient.

But it's utility as a bare sanction is not it's only utility: it is in the nature of it to forward
the enforcement of the other against those delinquents whose temerity it was itself insufficient
to restrain



Identifier: | JB/095/069/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 95.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

095

Main Headings

Folio number

069

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

observations continued

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] [lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

30955

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in