★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>SECT III. Divine Law</head>< | <head>SECT. III. Divine Law. <hi rend='superscript'>(3)</hi></head> | ||
</note> <del>that Law in which, as Bishop <gap/>< | |||
<p>contradict: are to be transgressed if they attempt it: <lb/> | |||
this must not be forgotten: <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi><note> <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> particularly concerning this those <del>f</del> against hanging in chains; and pardoning men convict of murder.</note> And this is our <lb/>Author's notion of the <sic>defence</sic> due in this country<lb/> to the Law given to the Jews: (for amongst the <lb/>Laws called <del>altogether</del> all together God's Laws <lb/> he makes no distinctions): <hi rend='superscript'>++</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>++</hi> A Right Reverend Father of our Church thinks differently: that <add>a</add> Law; <del>he calls it,</del> <add>in which, as</add> <del>in which together</del> <add>everything</add> <del>is <gap/></del> with most justice, I will not say, or consistency, he observes "every thing is extraordinary </note> <del>that a Law, in which, as<lb/> Bishop <gap/> <gap/> most justice & without<lb/> less <unclear>inconsistance</unclear> observes , <unclear><gap/></unclear>every thing is</del> "extraordinary <lb/> and which ought not to be proposed for<lb/> "example, any more than for imitation." It is for<lb/> the reader to judge which he will side with, the<lb/> theological politician, or the political divine.</p> | |||
<p>Here our Author offers from a Bishop: the more's<lb/> the pity: we shall now see him differing from <lb/>more than a Bishop: we shall see him differing from Locke.</p> | |||
<p>"Undoubtedly" <add>says our Author</add> "the revealed Law is (humanly speaking)" | |||
<lb/>(a particular sort of speaking, I suppose) of <lb/>"infinitely more authority than what we generally | |||
<lb/>"call the natural Law. Because one is the | |||
<lb/>"Law of Nature, expressly declared so to be by God <lb/> | |||
"himself; the other is only, what by the assistance <lb/>"of human reason, we <hi rend='underline'>imagine</hi> to be that Law." | |||
<lb/>"<hi rend='underline'>If we could be as certain of the latter,</hi> as <del>of</del> <lb/> | |||
"<hi rend='underline'>of the former</hi>, both would have an equal authority: <lb/> | |||
<note><del>when two Christians come together</del></note> "<hi rend='underline'>but till then</hi>" (which, we are to understand, is, <hi rend='underline'>never</hi>)</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
SECT. III. Divine Law. (3)
contradict: are to be transgressed if they attempt it:
this must not be forgotten: + + particularly concerning this those f against hanging in chains; and pardoning men convict of murder. And this is our
Author's notion of the defence due in this country
to the Law given to the Jews: (for amongst the
Laws called altogether all together God's Laws
he makes no distinctions): ++ ++ A Right Reverend Father of our Church thinks differently: that a Law; he calls it, in which, as in which together everything is with most justice, I will not say, or consistency, he observes "every thing is extraordinary that a Law, in which, as
Bishop most justice & without
less inconsistance observes , every thing is "extraordinary
and which ought not to be proposed for
"example, any more than for imitation." It is for
the reader to judge which he will side with, the
theological politician, or the political divine.
Here our Author offers from a Bishop: the more's
the pity: we shall now see him differing from
more than a Bishop: we shall see him differing from Locke.
"Undoubtedly" says our Author "the revealed Law is (humanly speaking)"
(a particular sort of speaking, I suppose) of
"infinitely more authority than what we generally
"call the natural Law. Because one is the
"Law of Nature, expressly declared so to be by God
"himself; the other is only, what by the assistance
"of human reason, we imagine to be that Law."
"If we could be as certain of the latter, as of
"of the former, both would have an equal authority:
when two Christians come together "but till then" (which, we are to understand, is, never)
|
Identifier: | JB/096/059/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
096 |
comment on the commentaries |
||
|
059 |
sect. iii divine law |
||
|
003 |
|||
|
text sheet |
4 |
||
|
recto |
f6 / d7 / f8 / d9 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] propatria [britannia motif]]] |
||
|
31063 |
|||
