★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (14 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
have <del>one</del> one, or ten persons, or the whole | |||
<add>of | <p><note>To be omitted</note> have <del>one</del> one, or ten persons, or the whole Community<lb/> | ||
in view: whether the operation of<lb/> | |||
that will be confined to a day, a, month, a<lb/> | |||
Year, or be extended to any number of Years<lb/> | |||
it is still a rule <add>of civil conduct, & therefore <del><gap/></del> a Law: /See Addenda a/</add> <del>and that therefore our Author</del><lb/> | |||
<del>should have added some Epithet to the</del><lb/> | |||
<del>word rule yet I shall not cavil with him</del> on<lb/> | |||
<del>This after explanation of the <gap/>. But</del> | |||
<del>But when he tells us, "that a particular act of</del></p> | |||
<p>Farther,<del>every</del> <add>though</add> the <del>benefit of</del> <add><del>operation</del> benefit granted for</add> a Law may, be confined to a single <del><add>appear to the <gap/><gap/>in <gap/> by</add></del><lb/> | |||
person, yet <sic>it's</sic> directions extend to all, <sic>it's</sic> penalties may <del>be</del><lb/> | |||
affect all. The Law which gives the field to Titius, directs every<lb/> | |||
member of the community to abstain from <del><add>our Author</add></del> the field; and threatens<lb/> | |||
every member with pains & penalties who shall interrupt Titius<lb/> | |||
in the enjoyment of it. <del>The Law Act which attain to Titius, directs every</del><lb/> | |||
<del>Member not to <gap/> or <add>his</add> harbor him.</del> —<lb/> | |||
<del>I call this last operation a Law in conformity <gap/> our Author: — who says</del></p> | |||
<p><del>Our Author goes on:</del><lb/> | |||
<del>But when he tells us, "that a particular act of</del></p> | |||
<p>But says our Author, a particular act of<lb/> | |||
"the legislature to confiscate the goods of Titius<lb/> | |||
"and to attaint him of high treason does not<lb/> | |||
"enter into the idea of a municipal law;"<lb/> | |||
I think so too: — But <del>I question</del> <add><del>upon a cry</del> for a very</add> different reason from that assigned<lb/> | |||
by our Author. — His reason is; "Because<lb/> | |||
<del>and that because</del> the operation of this act, is<lb/> | |||
"spent upon Titius only, <note><del>This is not</del> Q. is this true? Were a man to receive, harbor & abet this same Titius after he was attainted, would the Operation of the act be so thoroughly spent on the person of Titius as not to have reserved a stroke or two for his friends?</note> | |||
and has no relation <add>to</add></p> | |||
<head>75</head> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
To be omitted have one one, or ten persons, or the whole Community
in view: whether the operation of
that will be confined to a day, a, month, a
Year, or be extended to any number of Years
it is still a rule of civil conduct, & therefore a Law: /See Addenda a/ and that therefore our Author
should have added some Epithet to the
word rule yet I shall not cavil with him on
This after explanation of the . But
But when he tells us, "that a particular act of
Farther,every though the benefit of operation benefit granted for a Law may, be confined to a single appear to the in by
person, yet it's directions extend to all, it's penalties may be
affect all. The Law which gives the field to Titius, directs every
member of the community to abstain from our Author the field; and threatens
every member with pains & penalties who shall interrupt Titius
in the enjoyment of it. The Law Act which attain to Titius, directs every
Member not to or his harbor him. —
I call this last operation a Law in conformity our Author: — who says
Our Author goes on:
But when he tells us, "that a particular act of
But says our Author, a particular act of
"the legislature to confiscate the goods of Titius
"and to attaint him of high treason does not
"enter into the idea of a municipal law;"
I think so too: — But I question upon a cry for a very different reason from that assigned
by our Author. — His reason is; "Because
and that because the operation of this act, is
"spent upon Titius only, This is not Q. is this true? Were a man to receive, harbor & abet this same Titius after he was attainted, would the Operation of the act be so thoroughly spent on the person of Titius as not to have reserved a stroke or two for his friends?
and has no relation to
75
|
Identifier: | JB/096/029/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
096 |
comment on the commentaries |
||
|
029 |
|||
|
001 |
section vi / our author's account of municipal law |
||
|
collectanea |
2 |
||
|
recto |
c74 / c75 |
||
|
168 |
gr |
||
|
[[notes_public::"to be copied" [note not in bentham's hand]]] |
31033 |
||
