JB/057/060/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/057/060/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- date, heading and marginal notes in pencil -->
 


<p>31 May 1804</p> <head>Evidence</head> <p><note> <sic>ch.</sic> Justice when <gap/> had,lb/> but <gap/></note><lb/> (2</p> <p><note>5<lb/> The breach of contract<lb/> to which it mocks my<lb/> case not but be accompanied<lb/> with confessions <lb/> of wrong; which<lb/> is not not the case where<lb?> the contracts were terminally<lb/> or knowingly<lb/> illegal <foreign>ab mitio</foreign></note></p> <p>In rime wind it be to say &#x2014; it does not make more dishonest, <add> those which it causes men to</add><lb/><add>do is not dishonesty</add> since by doing what they are thus permitted to do,<lb/>they do no more than <sic>fulfill</sic> the declared intentions of the law.<lb/>It is not in this case, as in the case of a contract, <add>suppose between accomplices in depredation</add> prohibition<lb/> <del>rendered illegal, in contemplation of</del> the <gap/> of which is<lb/> not only compelled, but in contemplation of its mischievous<lb/> <add> prohibited and</add> rendered permissible.  The mischief resulting from the<lb/> <sic>fulfillment</sic> of such a contract is manifest to every eye: the existence<lb/> of the prohibition grounded on the contemplation of that<lb/> mischief is <gap/> manifest: <add>notorious</add> the <gap/> and <gap/> <gap/><lb/> the law are distinctly and explicitly declared: the greed that <lb/> results from the non-performance of the contract &#x2014; say the violation<lb/> of it &#x2014; <gap/> the breach of faith &#x2014; for that such it is there can<lb/> be no doubt &#x2014; is equally manifest. <add>indispensible</add>  But in the case of<lb/> the <sic>outlawry</sic> the <gap/> the matter of the law &#x2014; the simply<lb/> permission law are not so explicitly declared: the goods resulting<lb/> from <del>the</del> a man's availing himself of the permission is uncertain <add> indistinct</add><lb/> and questionable.  So far as the law <del>succeeds in making men</del> <add> finds in its endeavours to</add><lb/> make man break their faith, the good effect around it finds<lb/> altogether: and so far as it succeeds it succeeds but partially,<lb/> producing instead of a satisfaction which in proportion <del>of</del> <add> to</add> the<lb/> suffering attendant on the obligation <add>of rendering it</add> would have operated <del>as <gap/></del> <add> binders in the</add> <lb/> character of punishment, it produces nothing but a punishment<lb/>so mismanaged as not to operate in the character of satisfaction.</p> <p><note> 6<lb/>In respect of a sequestration<lb/> which it professes<lb/> to make for the sake of<lb/> justice <del> it in fact<lb/> divides</del> in the great majority<lb/> of instances it divides<lb/> or rather would if<lb/> resorted to the effects of<lb/> the outlaw among a<lb/>swarm of official<lb/> professional <sic>depredators</sic></note></p> <p>This then is what it <add>thus mark as to what the law</add> ought to do and does not do?  what<lb/> then does it do?  <add> To the injury of the distressed creditor</add> It takes the property of the distressed <add> still <gap/></add> debtor if<lb/> he has any, and divides it among a multitude <add> an almost <gap/>less multitude</add> of professional<lb/> and official hands: or as some would say <add> <del>in</del> for shortness</add> (and would they be to<lb/> be blamed?) among a flock of harpies.</p> <p> When each has had his meal <add> <gap/></add> <del><gap/></del> a chance then remains, it<lb/> must be acknowledged, of a <gap/> for the parties.  But what chance?  certainly<lb/> not a chance of one to <gap/>.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 17:28, 18 January 2019

Click Here To Edit


31 May 1804

Evidence

ch. Justice when had,lb/> but
(2

5
The breach of contract
to which it mocks my
case not but be accompanied
with confessions
of wrong; which
is not not the case where<lb?> the contracts were terminally
or knowingly
illegal ab mitio

In rime wind it be to say — it does not make more dishonest, those which it causes men to
do is not dishonesty since by doing what they are thus permitted to do,
they do no more than fulfill the declared intentions of the law.
It is not in this case, as in the case of a contract, suppose between accomplices in depredation prohibition
rendered illegal, in contemplation of the of which is
not only compelled, but in contemplation of its mischievous
prohibited and rendered permissible. The mischief resulting from the
fulfillment of such a contract is manifest to every eye: the existence
of the prohibition grounded on the contemplation of that
mischief is manifest: notorious the and
the law are distinctly and explicitly declared: the greed that
results from the non-performance of the contract — say the violation
of it — the breach of faith — for that such it is there can
be no doubt — is equally manifest. indispensible But in the case of
the outlawry the the matter of the law — the simply
permission law are not so explicitly declared: the goods resulting
from the a man's availing himself of the permission is uncertain indistinct
and questionable. So far as the law succeeds in making men finds in its endeavours to
make man break their faith, the good effect around it finds
altogether: and so far as it succeeds it succeeds but partially,
producing instead of a satisfaction which in proportion of to the
suffering attendant on the obligation of rendering it would have operated as binders in the
character of punishment, it produces nothing but a punishment
so mismanaged as not to operate in the character of satisfaction.

6
In respect of a sequestration
which it professes
to make for the sake of
justice it in fact
divides
in the great majority
of instances it divides
or rather would if
resorted to the effects of
the outlaw among a
swarm of official
professional depredators

This then is what it thus mark as to what the law ought to do and does not do? what
then does it do? To the injury of the distressed creditor It takes the property of the distressed still debtor if
he has any, and divides it among a multitude an almost less multitude of professional
and official hands: or as some would say in for shortness (and would they be to
be blamed?) among a flock of harpies.

When each has had his meal a chance then remains, it
must be acknowledged, of a for the parties. But what chance? certainly
not a chance of one to .



Identifier: | JB/057/060/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 57.

Date_1

1804-05-31

Marginal Summary Numbering

5-6

Box

057

Main Headings

evidence; procedure code

Folio number

060

Info in main headings field

evidence

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

18390

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in