★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<!-- date, heading and marginal notes in pencil --> | |||
<p>7 August 1805</p> <head> <del>Evidence</del> Procedure</head> <p><note>Procedure Removal<lb/> <sic>Ch</sic></note></p> <p> ? 4</p> <p> <note>Ill consequences of<lb/><del><gap/></del> rehearing of<lb/> the evidence were to<lb/> follow an appeal, as<lb/> of course</note></p> <p> Suppose the exercise of the right of appeal to be followed as<lb/> of course, by a rehearing of the testimonial part of the evidence<lb/> in the Court above. On the part of the extraneous witnesses, <del>the</del><lb/>the expense and vexation, if not compensated for <del>by</del> at the expense <add>charge</add> <lb/>of the parties, would frequently be ruinous and intolerable: if <add>so</add> compensated<lb/> for, inasmuch as the compensation for one indefinite number<lb/> of instances would come <add>fall</add> to be made at the expense of a single<lb/> party, <add>it would be<a/dd> still more ruinous and more intolerable. The more<lb/>opulent of the parties would thus in many cases, find himself<lb/> possessed <add>in possession</add> of a sure method of depriving his adversary of all chance<lb/>for justice. In a word, under an arrangement of this sort, the<lb/> natural system would in many cases be as hostile to the <add>at variance with</add> ends<lb/> of justice, as the worst modification of the technical system.</p> <p> Thus it is that happens, <add>Such is the state of things<a/dd> in <del> <gap/> <gap/></del> a certain degree <lb/> unfortunate <add> an unfortunate one</add> for mankind, <del>the collector</del> <add> that in case of appeal</add> in the greater number<lb/> of causes the extraction of evidence in the best mode <add>the best mode of examination</add> is incompatible<lb/> with the best judicature.</p> <p> Another misfortune is that in the ditant provinces<lb/> as far as depends upon the exercise of judicial power, <del> men can<lb/> never have so good a choice for</del. <add> in respect of the security against injustice<a/dd> men can never<lb/> be upon so good a footing as in the metropolis. But this too<lb/> is but one among the many disadvantages to which the condition<lb/> of the inhabitants of a distant province are subjected in comparison<lb/> of that of the inhabitants whose <del> residence is</del> <add> lot lies further</add> in the midst<lb/> of a numerous population and in the seat of government.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} |
7 August 1805
Evidence Procedure
Procedure Removal
Ch
? 4
Ill consequences of
rehearing of
the evidence were to
follow an appeal, as
of course
Suppose the exercise of the right of appeal to be followed as
of course, by a rehearing of the testimonial part of the evidence
in the Court above. On the part of the extraneous witnesses, the
the expense and vexation, if not compensated for by at the expense charge
of the parties, would frequently be ruinous and intolerable: if so compensated
for, inasmuch as the compensation for one indefinite number
of instances would come fall to be made at the expense of a single
party, it would be<a/dd> still more ruinous and more intolerable. The more
opulent of the parties would thus in many cases, find himself
possessed <add>in possession of a sure method of depriving his adversary of all chance
for justice. In a word, under an arrangement of this sort, the
natural system would in many cases be as hostile to the at variance with ends
of justice, as the worst modification of the technical system.
Thus it is that happens, Such is the state of things<a/dd> in a certain degree
unfortunate <add> an unfortunate one for mankind, the collector that in case of appeal in the greater number
of causes the extraction of evidence in the best mode the best mode of examination is incompatible
with the best judicature.
Another misfortune is that in the ditant provinces
as far as depends upon the exercise of judicial power, men can
never have so good a choice for</del. <add> in respect of the security against injustice<a/dd> men can never
be upon so good a footing as in the metropolis. But this too
is but one among the many disadvantages to which the condition
of the inhabitants of a distant province are subjected in comparison
of that of the inhabitants whose residence is lot lies further in the midst
of a numerous population and in the seat of government.
Identifier: | JB/057/122/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 57. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1805-08-07 |
not numbered |
||
057 |
evidence; procedure code |
||
122 |
[[info_in_main_headings_field::[evidence deleted] procedure]] |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
e4 |
||
jeremy bentham |
|||
18452 |
|||