★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1825. March 8<lb/> Procedure Code</head> <p>8<lb/><note><sic>Ch.</sic><lb/>§.</note></p> <p><!-- pencil addition --> <hi rend="underline"><gap/></hi> <gap/> <hi rend="underline"><gap/></hi>? (9</p> <p>14<lb/>Exceptions excepted<lb/> Judge to examine what<lb/> hold he may have<lb/> on the subject of a <lb/> foreign state for the<lb/> benefit of a subject<lb/> of this or a foreign state</note></p> <p><sic>Art.</sic> 1 Of the hold which the judiciary System<lb/>of this state has on the subjects of this Rule it may happen<lb/>that it has a part more or less considerable on this<lb/>or that subject of a foreign state: exception excepted<lb/><add>this hold</add> so far as may be necessary for the purposes of justice,<lb/>this hold the Judge will not scruple <add>forbear</add> to employ for<lb/>the benefit either of a subject of this state or for <del>the a</del> <lb/>subject of a foreign state.</p> <p>15.<lb/>Exceptions<lb/> 1 When the effect<lb/> would be <sic>encrease</sic> of<lb/> a defendants responsibility<lb/>for a public offence<lb/>against a foreign state</note></p> <p><sic>Art.</sic> 2. Exceptions are<lb/> 1. Where the effect of such interference would be to <sic>encrease</sic><lb/>the effectual responsibility <add>effective punishment</add> of the Defendant <add>individual in question</add> in respect of<lb/> a purely public offence against the government if a foreign<lb/> state of which he is a subject or against any other<lb/>foreign state.</p> <p><note>2 where judge sees<lb/> adequate grounds for<lb/> suspecting that it <lb/> would have that<lb/> effect</note></p> <p>2. Where the application having for its avowed <add>declared</add> object<lb/> the <sic>encreasing</add> the effectual responsibility, <gap/> or<lb/> <sic>satisfactional</sic> of the individual in question <del>n</del> not in<lb/>respect of any purely public offence but in <add>into</add> respect<lb/> of some simply <sic>requisitive</sic> or <sic>incuplative</sic> and <add>but</add> not<lb/> <sic>crimination</sic> or <del><sic>criminate</sci></del> public-private <add> private-<sic>criminative</sic></add> and <sic>criminative</sic><lb/> the Judge sees and declares adequate ground<lb?>for suspecting that the application has for its real<lb/>object the giving <sic>encrease</sic> to the effective responsibility<lb/> of the individual in respect of some purely <add><sic>alledged</sic></add> public offence<lb/><del>of the w</del> against this or that foreign state</p> <p>Reason This state will not interfere in any dispute between<lb/> the government of any foreign state and its subjects. The government of a state<lb/> <add>must</add><lb/><!-- continues in margin -->must be a system of misrule,<lb/> if by its own strength<lb/> it is not able to secure<lb/> obedience on the part of its<lb/> <!-- continues along the right hand edge of the page -->subjects without the assistance of the government of another state.</p> | |||
1825. March 8
Procedure Code
8
Ch.
§.
? (9
14
Exceptions excepted
Judge to examine what
hold he may have
on the subject of a
foreign state for the
benefit of a subject
of this or a foreign state</note>
Art. 1 Of the hold which the judiciary System
of this state has on the subjects of this Rule it may happen
that it has a part more or less considerable on this
or that subject of a foreign state: exception excepted
this hold so far as may be necessary for the purposes of justice,
this hold the Judge will not scruple forbear to employ for
the benefit either of a subject of this state or for the a
subject of a foreign state.
15.
Exceptions
1 When the effect
would be encrease of
a defendants responsibility
for a public offence
against a foreign state</note>
Art. 2. Exceptions are
1. Where the effect of such interference would be to encrease
the effectual responsibility effective punishment of the Defendant individual in question in respect of
a purely public offence against the government if a foreign
state of which he is a subject or against any other
foreign state.
2 where judge sees
adequate grounds for
suspecting that it
would have that
effect
2. Where the application having for its avowed declared object
the encreasing</add> the effectual responsibility, or
<sic>satisfactional of the individual in question n not in
respect of any purely public offence but in into respect
of some simply requisitive or incuplative and but not
crimination or <sic>criminate</sci> public-private private-criminative and criminative
the Judge sees and declares adequate ground<lb?>for suspecting that the application has for its real
object the giving encrease to the effective responsibility
of the individual in respect of some purely alledged public offence
of the w against this or that foreign state
Reason This state will not interfere in any dispute between
the government of any foreign state and its subjects. The government of a state
must
must be a system of misrule,
if by its own strength
it is not able to secure
obedience on the part of its
subjects without the assistance of the government of another state.
|
Identifier: | JB/057/171/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 57. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1825-03-08 |
14-15 |
||
|
057 |
procedure code |
||
|
171 |
procedure code |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d8 / e8 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
18501 |
|||
