★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1825. <sic>Feb<hi rend="superscript">y</hi></sic> 5<lb/> Procedure Code</head> <p><note><sic>ch.</sic><lb/> §.</note><lb/>(5)</p> <p><note>9<lb/>Worthlessness of the<lb/>remedy</note></p> <p><del>To <gap/></del> To what uses the remedy not as it is it applicable,<lb/> what inapplicable, the enquiry would be endless would be<lb/> the enquiry, brief <add><gap/> may be</add> the demonstration of its general worthlessness.<lb/> It is in the form of <add>what is called</add> an <hi rend="underline">affadavit</hi> that the declaration<lb/> is made: then is a simple declaration <add>worded</add> <del> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del><lb/>not by the <add>party</add> <sic>declarant</sic> but by his professional adviser and assistant<lb/>that the <sic>aprehended</sic> <gap/> is expressed: neither to <del><gap/></del><lb/>a party or the other end, nor to a Judge is <del><gap/> <gap/></del> <add> the operation</add> of<lb/> putting a question to the <sic>declarant</sic> guided possible. As at the<lb/>time of <gap/> <add>the appellant of</add> this bill of <gap/> <add>and security <gap/></add> which is not <del>either</del> resident<lb/>possible so neither is it at any subsequent time.</p> <p><note>19<lb/> Against falsehood<lb/> in affidavit evidence<lb/> sole remedy a separate<lb/> suit</note></p> <p>Against <sic>falshood</sic> in the point of the testifier, in this<lb/> as in all other cases of affidavit evidence the sole remedy<lb/> is a separate suit, and then a suit in <gap/> no compensation<lb/> in any shape for the wrong doer by the perjury and<lb/> the use of oppression for the <del><gap/></del> <add> licensing</add> of which it can employ<lb/> no compensation in any shape, can be obtained: nothing<lb/>but punishment, <gap/> punishment. Supposing a <add>an</add> <lb/> <gap/> <add> <gap/></add> for conviction discernible, such then is the operation<lb/> of the <gap/> in the character of a remedy: for the obtainment<lb/> of this chance the <del><gap/></del> expense <add>necessary</add> <gap/><lb/>of the vexation would be a <sic>burthen</sic> borne in general the<lb/> <gap/> with relation to which it is employed as a remedy</p> | |||
1825. Feby 5
Procedure Code
ch.
§.
(5)
9
Worthlessness of the
remedy
To To what uses the remedy not as it is it applicable,
what inapplicable, the enquiry would be endless would be
the enquiry, brief may be the demonstration of its general worthlessness.
It is in the form of what is called an affadavit that the declaration
is made: then is a simple declaration worded
not by the party declarant but by his professional adviser and assistant
that the aprehended is expressed: neither to
a party or the other end, nor to a Judge is the operation of
putting a question to the declarant guided possible. As at the
time of the appellant of this bill of and security which is not either resident
possible so neither is it at any subsequent time.
19
Against falsehood
in affidavit evidence
sole remedy a separate
suit
Against falshood in the point of the testifier, in this
as in all other cases of affidavit evidence the sole remedy
is a separate suit, and then a suit in no compensation
in any shape for the wrong doer by the perjury and
the use of oppression for the licensing of which it can employ
no compensation in any shape, can be obtained: nothing
but punishment, punishment. Supposing a an
for conviction discernible, such then is the operation
of the in the character of a remedy: for the obtainment
of this chance the expense necessary
of the vexation would be a burthen borne in general the
with relation to which it is employed as a remedy
|
Identifier: | JB/057/190/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 57. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1825-02-05 |
9-10 |
||
|
057 |
procedure code |
||
|
190 |
procedure code |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
c5 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
j whatman turkey mill 1824 |
||
|
admiral pavel chichagov |
|||
|
1824 |
|||
|
18520 |
|||
