★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head> 1825. <del><sic>Feb<hi rend="superscript">y</hi></sic> 7</del> March 20 B +<lb/> Procedure Code. <del> <gap/>?</head> <p>11<lb/> <note><sic>Ch. IX Intermediate proceeding</note><lb/>(11 <note>§. Testimony how procurable<lb/><del>Witness procedure<lb/> requiring Mandate</del></note></p> <p>Instructions § Testimony how procurable<lb/> In mandate — Warning</p> <p><note>1<lb/> <sic>Art.</sic> In every such<lb/> testimony requiring Mandate<lb/> will <gap/> be inserted<lb/> the warning following<lb/> 1. Warning of the <sic>burthensome</sic><lb/> consequence of<lb/> non compliance.<lb/> 2. Warning of the <sic>burthensome</sic><lb/> consequences of <lb/> <gap/>, in its several<lb/> shapes</note></p> <p><sic>Art.</sic> If the suit be a purely public penal suit<lb/>no individual party <add> <gap/> pursuer</add> will then be to whom pecuniary loss<lb/>from the non-attendance of a proposed witness can ensue. In<lb/>this case to the warning <add>threat</add> <gap/> of <add>announcement to</add> <gap/> <sic>burthen</sic><lb/> of compensation the <del><gap/></del> announcement of eventual punishment<lb/> will be to be substituted</p> <p><note>2<lb/> So where defendant has<lb/> applicable property</note></p> <p><sic>Art.</sic> So where the defendant has no <add>applicable<a/dd> disposable<lb/> property, it is in a state of relative and known insolvency.</p> <p><note>3<lb/> But to pursuer evil<lb/> from non attendance<lb/> of witness may be the<lb/> same as in the opposite<lb/> case</note></p> <p><sic>Art</sic> <del<>gap/></del> But <add>to the pursuer</add> in this case the <gap/> vexation<lb/>and expense resulting from non-attendance of the proposed<lb/>witness may be the same as in the opposite case and <del><gap/></del><lb/> <add> <gap/>,<add> for <del>the</del> evil in these shapes announcement of the <gap/> <lb/> obligation of making compensation will be <gap/> <gap/></p> <p><note>4<lb/>Warning of suspicion<lb/> of delinquency</note></p> <p> <sic>Art.</sic> <add>Warning on the attendance, suspicion of delinquency</add> For a <add><gap/></add> criminal case whether purely <add><gap/></add><lb/> public or public-private it may be that what <del>the/del> demand<lb/> for the testimony of a certain individual clearly has<lb/> place it may be matter of uncertainty whether in relation<lb/> to the crime in question he may not be either the sole criminal<lb/> or an accomplice <add>in a cri</del> or <sic>codelinquent</sic>. In such case<lb/> <del>there may perhaps be</del> what may happen is that there<lb/> <del>should be</del> Judge may see reason to insist in the Witnesses<lb/> Attendance requiring mandate an intimation that in<lb/> failure of attendance without valid excuse, he may become<lb/>suspected of have been guilty and as such be therefore<lb/>constituted Defendant or <sic>Codefendant</sic>.</p> | |||
1825. Feby 7 March 20 B +
Procedure Code. ?
11
<sic>Ch. IX Intermediate proceeding
(11 §. Testimony how procurable
Witness procedure
requiring Mandate
Instructions § Testimony how procurable
In mandate — Warning
1
Art. In every such
testimony requiring Mandate
will be inserted
the warning following
1. Warning of the burthensome
consequence of
non compliance.
2. Warning of the burthensome
consequences of
, in its several
shapes
Art. If the suit be a purely public penal suit
no individual party pursuer will then be to whom pecuniary loss
from the non-attendance of a proposed witness can ensue. In
this case to the warning threat of announcement to burthen
of compensation the announcement of eventual punishment
will be to be substituted
2
So where defendant has
applicable property
Art. So where the defendant has no applicable<a/dd> disposable
property, it is in a state of relative and known insolvency.
3
But to pursuer evil
from non attendance
of witness may be the
same as in the opposite
case
Art <del<>gap/> But <add>to the pursuer in this case the vexation
and expense resulting from non-attendance of the proposed
witness may be the same as in the opposite case and
,<add> for the evil in these shapes announcement of the
obligation of making compensation will be
4
Warning of suspicion
of delinquency
Art. <add>Warning on the attendance, suspicion of delinquency For a criminal case whether purely
public or public-private it may be that what the/del> demand
for the testimony of a certain individual clearly has
place it may be matter of uncertainty whether in relation
to the crime in question he may not be either the sole criminal
or an accomplice <add>in a cri or codelinquent. In such case
there may perhaps be what may happen is that there
should be Judge may see reason to insist in the Witnesses
Attendance requiring mandate an intimation that in
failure of attendance without valid excuse, he may become
suspected of have been guilty and as such be therefore
constituted Defendant or Codefendant.
|
Identifier: | JB/057/215/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 57. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1825-03-20 |
1-4 |
||
|
057 |
procedure code |
||
|
215 |
procedure code |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d11 / e11 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
18545 |
|||
