JB/057/318/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/057/318/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/057/318/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/057/318/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<head>1827. <sic>Nov<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi></sic> 11 + <lb/> Law Amendment</head> <!-- figures and ult in pencil --> <p>20 <note>ult<lb/> Propositions</note><lb/>(1 <note><sic>Ch.</sic>iv Oaths, none<lb/> Proposed System</note></p> <p>Oath 1 <gap/>  2 Witnesses. 3. Judges.<lb/>&#9758; Goes in <gap/> <gap/> Appendix.<lb/>Swearing and <hi rend="underline">for</hi>swearing.</p> <p><sic>Ch. IV Oath, none</p> <!-- O in pencil besides marginal numbers --> <p><note>1<lb/>Oath none in any<lb/> case &#x2014; Judicial<lb/> statement, <hi rend="underline">asseveration</hi></note></p> <p> 1. Oath none in any case: criminal any more than<lb/>civil.  <del>For <gap/></del> Statement on a judicial occasion is for<lb/> a judicial purpose, <hi rend="underline">asseveration</hi>.  Asseveration in so far as<lb/> false, has for its accompaniment <del>civil</del> <add> criminal</add> consciousness, or for its cause<lb/> culpable inadvertence, or blameless error. By criminal consciousness<lb/> understand consciousness of the falsity of that which is<lb/> asseverated:  <del>the</del> in <del>correct</del> <add> customary</add> language wilful is the name<lb/> by which the <sic>falshood</sic> is <sic>characterized.</sic></p> <p><note>2<lb/> Of Wrongful judicial<lb/> asseveration or say<lb/> Mendacity consequent<lb/> satisfaction or punishment<lb/> or both</note></p> <p><sic>Falshood</sic> on whatever occasion uttered will either<lb/> have been or not have been followed by evil consequences consequence<lb/> productive of wrong in some determinate shape expressed<lb/> by some denomination of offence.  Of this production of wrong<lb/> <del>punishment</del> satisfaction or punishment or both, as the case may<lb/> require, will be as for the offence consummated: if not,<lb/> as for the attempt &#x2014; the offence <gap/> <add>in a material state</add>. <del>Accompanied <add>Produced</add></del><lb/> <del>by <gap/> and <gap/></del> In case of wrong thus operated, <del>produced</del><lb/> <del>by <gap/> of satisfaction</del> <add>for</add> the offence <del>having</del> <add>of which it has had</add> inadvertence for its<lb/> <gap/> satisfaction <add>for <sic>subsequential</sic> repression</add>, <!-- bracket in pencil --> [or where there being no individual to <add> Note (a) ? as in case of a party public</add><lb/> relieve it equivalent suffering under the name of punishment]<lb/> will for <sic>subsequential</sic> repression suffice.  For false asseveration<lb/>accompanied with <del>civil</del> criminal consciousness, appropriate<lb/> denomination mendacious judicial <gap/>, or<lb/> for <gap/> judicial mendacity, or in one word mendacity.</p> <p><note>3<lb/> If <del>Judge</del> evidence<lb/> <del>prove<d/el> sufficiently<lb/> <sic>probative</sic>of falsehood<lb/> punitive or satisfaction<lb/> requiring mandate<lb/> issued on the spot</note></p> <p>Generally speaking  whatsoever evidence <del>thus</del> will have<lb/> sufficed to produce in the mind of the Judge an adequate persuasion<lb/> that the asseveration in question was at the time of utterance<lb/> criminally or culpably false will have sufficient to<lb/> warrant his dealing with it as such in the way of satisfaction<lb/> or <del>both</del> punishment or both as above.  If yes, let him choose<lb/> <add>and</add><lb/> <!-- continues in margin --> and order punishment<lb?> upon the spot: if, to<lb/> warrant such desire<lb/> also in evidence such<lb/> as can not be elicited<lb/> but in some ulterior<lb/> <!-- continues along the edge of the page -->law be regarded  by him as necessary, in that case and not otherwise, let him adjourn the enquiry <add>for this purpose alone</add> to give admission to such ulterior evidence.</p>


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''





Revision as of 11:38, 19 August 2019

Click Here To Edit

1827. Novr. 11 +
Law Amendment

20 ult
Propositions

(1 Ch.iv Oaths, none
Proposed System

Oath 1 2 Witnesses. 3. Judges.
☞ Goes in Appendix.
Swearing and forswearing.

Ch. IV Oath, none

1
Oath none in any
case — Judicial
statement, asseveration

1. Oath none in any case: criminal any more than
civil. For Statement on a judicial occasion is for
a judicial purpose, asseveration. Asseveration in so far as
false, has for its accompaniment civil criminal consciousness, or for its cause
culpable inadvertence, or blameless error. By criminal consciousness
understand consciousness of the falsity of that which is
asseverated: the in correct customary language wilful is the name
by which the <sic>falshood is characterized.

2
Of Wrongful judicial
asseveration or say
Mendacity consequent
satisfaction or punishment
or both

Falshood on whatever occasion uttered will either
have been or not have been followed by evil consequences consequence
productive of wrong in some determinate shape expressed
by some denomination of offence. Of this production of wrong
punishment satisfaction or punishment or both, as the case may
require, will be as for the offence consummated: if not,
as for the attempt — the offence in a material state. Accompanied Produced
by and In case of wrong thus operated, produced
by of satisfaction for the offence having of which it has had inadvertence for its
satisfaction for subsequential repression, [or where there being no individual to Note (a) ? as in case of a party public
relieve it equivalent suffering under the name of punishment]
will for subsequential repression suffice. For false asseveration
accompanied with civil criminal consciousness, appropriate
denomination mendacious judicial , or
for judicial mendacity, or in one word mendacity.

3
If Judge evidence
prove<d/el> sufficiently
probativeof falsehood
punitive or satisfaction
requiring mandate
issued on the spot

Generally speaking whatsoever evidence thus will have
sufficed to produce in the mind of the Judge an adequate persuasion
that the asseveration in question was at the time of utterance
criminally or culpably false will have sufficient to
warrant his dealing with it as such in the way of satisfaction
or both punishment or both as above. If yes, let him choose
and
and order punishment<lb?> upon the spot: if, to
warrant such desire
also in evidence such
as can not be elicited
but in some ulterior
law be regarded by him as necessary, in that case and not otherwise, let him adjourn the enquiry for this purpose alone to give admission to such ulterior evidence.




Identifier: | JB/057/318/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 57.

Date_1

1827-11-11

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-3

Box

057

Main Headings

law amendment

Folio number

318

Info in main headings field

law amendment

Image

001

Titles

ch. iv / oath, none

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d20 / e1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

18648

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in