★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/167/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/096/167/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<head>PUNISHMENT <add>it's END</add> <add>KEYMIS</add> VINDICTIVE PRINCIPLE</head><lb/> <p>"Upon certain actions hurtful to others the x of<lb/> <hi rend='underline'>impropriety</hi> & <hi rend='underline'>wrong</hi> is impressed? in Characters x<lb/> to all, not excepting the delinquent." If <add>it is</add> hereby <del>the</del><lb/> <del>Author</del> means, that certain actions are generally &<lb/> readily perceived to be hurtful to others it is true<lb/> & it is from conceiving that perceiving or x that our indignation is produced <add>judgment of his guilt</add> <add>underx into x petty</add><lb/> if it be any thing more than a confused<lb/> and x x disapprobation.</p> <note>When we can give any reason for it, that is the reason & no other.</note><pb/><!-- Here the page is extended by the addition of separate sheet (pinned or stitched? to the first. --><note> The treatment of a good man, that is of a man who has tuned his feelings in unison with the x x interest, or rather ins...</note><add>it is the natural inconsistency of men & the impossibility<lb/> of entertaining? an underx adherence? to the con?nexion<lb/> he has taken up that saves him.<lb/></add><head> PUNISHMENT It's END</head> // <p>Resentment is a criticism of right & wrong & why? + because<lb/> it usually follows an action prejudicial to the Interest<lb/> of Society — but suppose it produced by an action not<lb/> mischievous? Is it then a criticism of right & wrong?<lb/> no surely — <del>or else</del> what <add>else</add> do we mean by an unjust<lb/> resentment</p> + v.? Keymis Hist/ of the Criminal Law that would be to be always in the right, with that of public opinion or the yet x voices of x religion, which is always to mean to be so the x of such a man x, rises at the sight of x x: but --- I know that when a man is angry, he wishes to be thought to be in the right: but I should not have thought in cold blood of saying that he must be so. T ??? unless whenever a man is angry, x and apprised> of all the facts for I will do it justice if he is in the right, resentment can never be a fit criticism/criterion to be x to | <head>PUNISHMENT <add>it's END</add> <add>KEYMIS</add><!-- "There is at least one | ||
lesser but not negligible figure to be reckoned with – Henry Home, Lord Kames | |||
(1696-1782). It is certainly the case that Bentham refers approvingly to Kames on | |||
several occasions in his early writings (and we need not attach too much significance | |||
to the fact the consistently misspelt the name as ‘Keymis’). Kames’s Historical Law | |||
Tracts (1758) do seem to have made a favourable impression on Bentham...." from BENTHAM AND THE SCOTS | |||
J. H. Burns, p. 5 - http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/658/1/9.5burns_scots.pdf --> VINDICTIVE PRINCIPLE</head><lb/> <p>"Upon certain actions hurtful to others the x of<lb/> <hi rend='underline'>impropriety</hi> & <hi rend='underline'>wrong</hi> is impressed? in Characters x<lb/> to all, not excepting the delinquent." If <add>it is</add> hereby <del>the</del><lb/> <del>Author</del> means, that certain actions are generally &<lb/> readily perceived to be hurtful to others it is true<lb/> & it is from conceiving that perceiving or x that our indignation is produced <add>judgment of his guilt</add> <add>underx into x petty</add><lb/> if it be any thing more than a confused<lb/> and x x disapprobation.</p> <note>When we can give any reason for it, that is the reason & no other.</note><pb/><!-- Here the page is extended by the addition of separate sheet (pinned or stitched? to the first. --><note> The treatment of a good man, that is of a man who has tuned his feelings in unison with the x x interest, or rather ins...</note><add>it is the natural inconsistency of men & the impossibility<lb/> of entertaining? an underx adherence? to the con?nexion<lb/> he has taken up that saves him.<lb/></add><head> PUNISHMENT It's END</head> // <p>Resentment is a criticism of right & wrong & why? + because<lb/> it usually follows an action prejudicial to the Interest<lb/> of Society — but suppose it produced by an action not<lb/> mischievous? Is it then a criticism of right & wrong?<lb/> no surely — <del>or else</del> what <add>else</add> do we mean by an unjust<lb/> resentment</p> + v.? Keymis Hist/ of the Criminal Law that would be to be always in the right, with that of public opinion or the yet x voices of x religion, which is always to mean to be so the x of such a man x, rises at the sight of x x: but --- I know that when a man is angry, he wishes to be thought to be in the right: but I should not have thought in cold blood of saying that he must be so. T ??? unless whenever a man is angry, x and apprised> of all the facts for I will do it justice if he is in the right, resentment can never be a fit criticism/criterion to be x to | |||
PUNISHMENT END. False - Vengeance - Keymis. | PUNISHMENT END. False - Vengeance - Keymis. | ||
PUNISHMENT it's END KEYMIS VINDICTIVE PRINCIPLE
"Upon certain actions hurtful to others the x of
impropriety & wrong is impressed? in Characters x
to all, not excepting the delinquent." If it is hereby the
Author means, that certain actions are generally &
readily perceived to be hurtful to others it is true
& it is from conceiving that perceiving or x that our indignation is produced judgment of his guilt underx into x petty
if it be any thing more than a confused
and x x disapprobation.
When we can give any reason for it, that is the reason & no other.
---page break---
The treatment of a good man, that is of a man who has tuned his feelings in unison with the x x interest, or rather ins...it is the natural inconsistency of men & the impossibility
of entertaining? an underx adherence? to the con?nexion
he has taken up that saves him.
PUNISHMENT It's END //
Resentment is a criticism of right & wrong & why? + because
it usually follows an action prejudicial to the Interest
of Society — but suppose it produced by an action not
mischievous? Is it then a criticism of right & wrong?
no surely — or else what else do we mean by an unjust
resentment
+ v.? Keymis Hist/ of the Criminal Law that would be to be always in the right, with that of public opinion or the yet x voices of x religion, which is always to mean to be so the x of such a man x, rises at the sight of x x: but --- I know that when a man is angry, he wishes to be thought to be in the right: but I should not have thought in cold blood of saying that he must be so. T ??? unless whenever a man is angry, x and apprised> of all the facts for I will do it justice if he is in the right, resentment can never be a fit criticism/criterion to be x to
PUNISHMENT END. False - Vengeance - Keymis.
|
Identifier: | JB/096/167/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
096 |
punishment |
||
|
167 |
punishment end false vengeance keymis |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
2 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[partial initials]]] |
||
|
31171 |
|||
