★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
several occasions in his early writings (and we need not attach too much significance | several occasions in his early writings (and we need not attach too much significance | ||
to the fact the consistently misspelt the name as ‘Keymis’). Kames’s Historical Law | to the fact the consistently misspelt the name as ‘Keymis’). Kames’s Historical Law | ||
Tracts (1758) do seem to have made a favourable impression on Bentham...." J.H. Burns, "Bentham and the Scots,"5. http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/658/1/9.5burns_scots.pdf -->VINDICTIVE PRINCIPLE</head | Tracts (1758) do seem to have made a favourable impression on Bentham...." J.H. Burns, "Bentham and the Scots,"5. http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/658/1/9.5burns_scots.pdf -->VINDICTIVE PRINCIPLE</head> <p> "Upon certain actions hurtful to others the stamp of<lb/> <hi rend='underline'>impropriety</hi> & <hi rend='underline'>wrong</hi> is impressed in Character <gap/><lb/> to all, not excepting the delinquent." If <add>it is</add> hereby <del>the</del><lb/> <del>Author</del> means, that certain actions are generally & <lb/> readily perceived to be hurtful to others it is true<lb/> & it is from conceiving <add>perceiving or <gap/></add> that our indignation <add>judgment of his guilt</add> <add><gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/></add> is produced<lb/> if it be any thing more than a confused <lb/> and <gap/> <gap/> disapprobation. </p> <note>When we can give any reason for it, that is the reason & no other.</note> <pb/> <!-- Here the page is extended by the addition of separate sheet (pinned or stitched? to the first. --> | ||
<head> PUNISHMENT It's END</head><lb/> | <head> PUNISHMENT It's END</head><lb/> <p> Resentment is a criticism of right & wrong & why? + because<lb/> it usually follows an action prejudicial to the Interest<lb/> of Society — but suppose it produced by an action not<lb/> mischievous? Is it then a criticism of right & wrong?<lb/> no surely — <del>or else</del> what <add>else</add> do we mean by an unjust<lb/> resentment</p> <note>The treatment of a good man, that is of a man who has tuned his feelings in unison with the <add><gap/></add> public interest, or rather <gap/> <add>it is the natural inconsistency of men & the impossibility of understanding? an <gap/> adherence? to the <gap/> he has taken up that saves him <!-- Here a new marginal notation begins with link to + on line below second heading, "Punishment It's End"-->+ v. Keymis Hist/ of the Criminal Law that would be to be always in the right, with that of public opinion or the yet <gap/> <add> voices of</add> religion, which is always to mean to be so the <gap/> of such a man & <gap/>, rises at the sight of <gap/>: but --- I know that when a man is angry, he wishes to be thought to be in the right: but I should not have thought in cold blood of saying that he must be so. They all <unclear>faulty</unclear> <gap/> or refer to some <add>enough</add> After which it <gap/> Unless whenever a man is angry, <unclear>fault</unclear> <unclear>appeared</unclear> of all the facts for I will do it justice if he is in the right, resentment can never be a fit criticism/criterion to be <gap/> to.</note> | ||
PUNISHMENT END. False - Vengeance - Keymis. | <head>PUNISHMENT END. False - Vengeance - Keymis.</head> | ||
PUNISHMENT it's END KEYMIS VINDICTIVE PRINCIPLE
"Upon certain actions hurtful to others the stamp of
impropriety & wrong is impressed in Character
to all, not excepting the delinquent." If it is hereby the
Author means, that certain actions are generally &
readily perceived to be hurtful to others it is true
& it is from conceiving perceiving or that our indignation judgment of his guilt is produced
if it be any thing more than a confused
and disapprobation.
When we can give any reason for it, that is the reason & no other.
---page break---
PUNISHMENT It's END
Resentment is a criticism of right & wrong & why? + because
it usually follows an action prejudicial to the Interest
of Society — but suppose it produced by an action not
mischievous? Is it then a criticism of right & wrong?
no surely — or else what else do we mean by an unjust
resentment
The treatment of a good man, that is of a man who has tuned his feelings in unison with the public interest, or rather it is the natural inconsistency of men & the impossibility of understanding? an adherence? to the he has taken up that saves him + v. Keymis Hist/ of the Criminal Law that would be to be always in the right, with that of public opinion or the yet <add> voices of religion, which is always to mean to be so the of such a man & , rises at the sight of : but --- I know that when a man is angry, he wishes to be thought to be in the right: but I should not have thought in cold blood of saying that he must be so. They all faulty or refer to some enough After which it Unless whenever a man is angry, fault appeared of all the facts for I will do it justice if he is in the right, resentment can never be a fit criticism/criterion to be to.
PUNISHMENT END. False - Vengeance - Keymis.
|
Identifier: | JB/096/167/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
096 |
punishment |
||
|
167 |
punishment end false vengeance keymis |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
2 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[partial initials]]] |
||
|
31171 |
|||
