JB/095/115/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/095/115/001: Difference between revisions

Doug12 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
<head>Observations</head><head>XXIV</head>
<head>Observations</head><head>XXIV</head>


Despairing (as with some reason they may) of a perfect<lb/>obediance they cite late of with that <lb/>promise no more than to procure<add>produce</add> a practical one<lb/>  but such a partial one, as the event often shows <lb/> to be insufficient to answer the purpose of the Law<lb/> <p>paragraph</p>Followers or <gap/>in calculating the <lb/>effect of their <gap/><gap/><add>often their utmost industry</add> make [commendably]<lb/>employed in <gap/> the effects of <del>allowance on the account</del> <gap/> to which their work is liable <add>yet</add>first not to make <lb/>a  considerable <add>dideration</add>balance on these accounts, so <lb/>ought Legislation in calculating the force of their <lb/> congress to be <gap/> that many more obstacles <lb/>will bring up to their execution than what they<lb/> can forsee, much more all they do foresee.<lb/><p>paragraph</p>1&#x2014;S 6<lb/>Ahab hath served <unclear>Boal</unclear>a little: but John<lb/> shall serve him much<lb/><p>paragraph</p>The following deletions of the original <add>paragraph in</add> with the interpolations<lb/> <add><gap/></add> inserted may serve as a commentary <lb/> on this text.<lb/><p>paragraph</p> As a proof that so much more than enough becomes<lb/><gap/>I have <del>have</del>inserted all along the additions necessary to make it consistent with itself.<lb/><pb/>  
<p>Despairing (as with some reason they may) of a perfect<lb/>obedience they will take up  with<!-- blank space --> that <lb/>promise no more than to procure<add>produce</add> a partial one<lb/>  but such a partial one, as the event often <sic>shews</sic> <lb/> to be insufficient to answer the purposes of the Law<lb/> </p><p>Whereas, as Mechanics in calculating the <lb/>effect of their Machines, always make [considerable<add>offer their utmost industry</add><lb/><add> <sic>employ'd</sic> in mitigating the effects of</add> <del>allowance <add>abatement</add>  on the account</del> of Inertia &amp; others <lb/> to which their work is liable, <add>yet</add> fail not to make<lb/>a  considerable <add>deduction</add> abatement on these accounts, so <lb/>ought Legislators in calculating the force of their <lb/> engines to be persuaded, that many more obstacles<lb/>will spring up to their execution than what they<lb/> <hi rend='underline'>can</hi> foresee, much more all they do foresee.<lb/>
<head>§ <del><gap/></del> 6</head>


<p>Ahab hath served Baal a little: but Jehu<lb/> shall serve him much &#x2014;<lb/></p>
The following Sections of the original <add>prepared in</add> with the interpolations<lb/><add>that manner that the reader was</add> <add>here</add> inserted may serve as a commentary <lb/> on this text.<lb/><p>  As a proof that so much more than enough becomes<lb/>less I have <del>have</del>inserted all along the additions<lb/> necessary to make it consistent with itself.<lb/></p><pb/>


<head>Purgatory Preamble</head>
<del>deleted text</del> It may not be easy to discover 4 to class <gap/>using<lb/>distinguishable physics of nugation: this <gap/<lb/>>with Journals as with 2. <lb/>1. Recital of the profitability of an obvious mischief<lb/>meant to be prevented.<lb/>2. Recital in general <add>terms of the existence</add> that a certain practice is inconvenient<add> the profitability of an act and its imagined implementation</add> <gap/>supposed by the very act <lb/>of prohibition Or there-1. Recital that a <gap/><lb/>meant to be prevented is mischievous<gap/>Recital that is is profiftible <note>Where something is<lb/> to be said , the ways <lb/> of saying it may<lb/>come under liberal <del>deleted text</del>cal-culation. But <lb/>the way of saying<lb/> nothing at all<lb/> are infinite.</note><p>paragraph</p>I cannot very well understand<del><del>deleted text</del></del>reason <add>than is to be contemplated</add> why Noblemans<lb/><gap/><gap/>are to be exempted from<lb/> all these regulations by having


completing it all day<lb/><del>deleted text</del>  succeeding to their plan <del>deleted text</del> <add>trailed over</add> here and there <lb/>in different parts of the instrument, <add><gap/></add> <del>deleted text</del><lb/>In this view
<head>Nugatory  Preamble</head>
<gap/>care has been taken not<lb/>to insist &#x2014; for which a <lb/> <gap/>&amp;practicle one<lb/><pb/> <gap/><lb/><pb/><lb/><pb/> to insist any&#x2014; for which a   <gap/> <gap/> is not to be met with in some hard <gap/> or other<lb/> <p>paragraph</p> Had I been able to satisfy myself concerning this <lb/> <gap/> denominations of carriages to which the <lb/>journal <add>which</add> <gap/>of this division as previously    
<del>This Statute to</del> It may not be easy to discover &amp; to class every<lb/>distinguishable species of <hi rend='underline'>nugation</hi>: this Statute will furnish us with 2.<lb/> <lb/>1. Recital of the possibility of an obvious mischief<lb/>meant to be prevented.<lb/>2. Recital in <hi rend='underline'>general</hi> <add>terms of the existence</add> that a certain practice is<lb/> inconvenient<add> the possibility of an act <add>event</add> and its imagined mischief <add>inconvenience</add> </add> mischief </add. superceded <add>on ...</add> by the very act <lb/>of prohibition. As this - 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> Recital that a franchise <lb/>meant to be prevented is mischievous <gap/> Recital that it is possible<note>Where something is<lb/> to be said , the ways <lb/> of saying it may<lb/>come under liberal <del>deleted text</del>cal-culation. But <lb/>the way of saying<lb/> nothing at all<lb/> are infinite.</note>
<head>§ 23</head>
<p>I cannot very well understand <del>a</del> <del><add>the</add></del> reason <add>there is to be an example</add> why Noblemen's<lb/>& Gentlemen's carriages are to be exempted from<lb/> all these regulations by being "covered" when <add>there is none for</add> such<lb/> as are open are not exempted.</p>
<p>Nor why upon the <add>this</add> condition of covering his carriage<lb/><del>a man</del> is to <del> be <sic>allow'd</sic></del> <add>bear up</add> the Load, with any weight<lb/>drawn by any number of horses he thinks proper.<lb/></p>
<p>But if he assumes those insignia of a Gentleman<lb/><sic>uncover'd</sic> carriage <add>how can it be that .. is a </add>what Exempted man is to <lb/>suppose <add>presume</add> from that what is in the mode of it is not<lb/> for the owner's own use</p><pb/>
 
 
<p><add>contemplating it all along</add> according to the plan adopted <add>traced out</add> here and there<lb/>in different parts of the instrument. <add>Statute</add> <del>examples</del><lb/> In this view <del>I have</del> care has been taken not to insert any <!-- blank space underlined with dashes --> for which a precedent<lb/> is not to be met with<hi rend='superscript'>2</hi> in some part of it or other<hi rend='superscript'>1</hi><!-- the superscript 2 is bracketed to the phrase "is not to be met with", and the superscript 1 is bracketed to the phrase "in some part of it or other--></p>
<pb/>
<note>CARRIERS</note>
<p> Had I been able to satisfy myself concerning the <lb/> respective denominations of <del><gap/></del> carriages to which the <lb/>several parts <add>Articles</add> of this division respectively relate<lb/> It might have been a still  further <add>would have contributed still to</add><lb/> to have broken it into subdivisions corresponent<lb/> to these denominations &#x2014; The Law <add>concerning the owners of</add> of private<lb/> carriages would <add>thus</add> have be<del>deleted text</del> made one Section: that <lb/>concerning carriages used only in Husbandry another a 2<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi><lb/>That concerning Public Carriages in general a 3<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi>.<lb/></p><pb/><p>And here [it is]we <add><del>we</del> may feel at once</add> see the advantages of a synoptic<lb/>representation: <del>whereby</del> &amp; of a compacted stile,<lb/>without which indeed the framer scarely could<lb/>have place.<lb/></p> <pb/>By the 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> the multitude of particular propositions<lb/> of which a <add>more</add> general proposition is in<lb/> some way or other predicated, are together<lb/>with it, <add>that general proposition</add> brought under the eye at once:<lb/>By <add>means of</add> the 2<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi>, the eye <add>is enabled to</add> fastens in the instant<lb/> on that  which it is in quest of, no longer<lb/>doomed to the hideous <add>dread?</add> labours of picking out<lb/>one by one <add>the significant</add>  <del>the </del> words <del>significant</del>, from <del>the</del><lb/>insignificant.<lb/>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 23:23, 21 February 2011

Click Here To Edit

This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet ObservationsXXIV

Despairing (as with some reason they may) of a perfect
obedience they will take up with that
promise no more than to procureproduce a partial one
but such a partial one, as the event often shews
to be insufficient to answer the purposes of the Law

Whereas, as Mechanics in calculating the
effect of their Machines, always make [considerableoffer their utmost industry
employ'd in mitigating the effects of allowance abatement on the account of Inertia & others
to which their work is liable, yet fail not to make
a considerable deduction abatement on these accounts, so
ought Legislators in calculating the force of their
engines to be persuaded, that many more obstacles
will spring up to their execution than what they
can foresee, much more all they do foresee.

§ 6

Ahab hath served Baal a little: but Jehu
shall serve him much —

The following Sections of the original prepared in with the interpolations
that manner that the reader was here inserted may serve as a commentary
on this text.

As a proof that so much more than enough becomes
less I have haveinserted all along the additions
necessary to make it consistent with itself.


---page break---


Nugatory Preamble This Statute to It may not be easy to discover & to class every
distinguishable species of nugation: this Statute will furnish us with 2.

1. Recital of the possibility of an obvious mischief
meant to be prevented.
2. Recital in general terms of the existence that a certain practice is
inconvenient the possibility of an act <add>event and its imagined mischief inconvenience </add> mischief </add. superceded on ... by the very act
of prohibition. As this - 1st Recital that a franchise
meant to be prevented is mischievous Recital that it is possibleWhere something is
to be said , the ways
of saying it may
come under liberal deleted textcal-culation. But
the way of saying
nothing at all
are infinite.
§ 23

I cannot very well understand a the reason there is to be an example why Noblemen's
& Gentlemen's carriages are to be exempted from
all these regulations by being "covered" when there is none for such
as are open are not exempted.

Nor why upon the this condition of covering his carriage
a man is to be allow'd bear up the Load, with any weight
drawn by any number of horses he thinks proper.

But if he assumes those insignia of a Gentleman
uncover'd carriage how can it be that .. is a what Exempted man is to
suppose presume from that what is in the mode of it is not
for the owner's own use


---page break---


contemplating it all along according to the plan adopted traced out here and there
in different parts of the instrument. Statute examples
In this view I have care has been taken not to insert any for which a precedent
is not to be met with2 in some part of it or other1


---page break---
CARRIERS

Had I been able to satisfy myself concerning the
respective denominations of carriages to which the
several parts Articles of this division respectively relate
It might have been a still further would have contributed still to
to have broken it into subdivisions corresponent
to these denominations — The Law concerning the owners of of private
carriages would thus have bedeleted text made one Section: that
concerning carriages used only in Husbandry another a 2d
That concerning Public Carriages in general a 3d.


---page break---

And here [it is]we we may feel at once see the advantages of a synoptic
representation: whereby & of a compacted stile,
without which indeed the framer scarely could
have place.


---page break---
By the 1st the multitude of particular propositions
of which a more general proposition is in
some way or other predicated, are together
with it, that general proposition brought under the eye at once:
By means of the 2d, the eye is enabled to fastens in the instant
on that which it is in quest of, no longer
doomed to the hideous dread? labours of picking out
one by one the significant the words significant, from the
insignificant.






Identifier: | JB/095/115/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 95.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

095

Main Headings

Folio number

115

Info in main headings field

observations xxiv

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] [lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

31001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in