★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
to the fact the consistently misspelt the name as ‘Keymis’). Kames’s Historical Law | to the fact the consistently misspelt the name as ‘Keymis’). Kames’s Historical Law | ||
Tracts (1758) do seem to have made a favourable impression on Bentham...." J.H. Burns, "Bentham and the Scots,"5. http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/658/1/9.5burns_scots.pdf --> VINDICTIVE PRINCIPLE</head> <p> "Upon certain actions hurtful to others the stamp of<lb/> <hi rend='underline'>impropriety</hi> & <hi rend='underline'>wrong</hi> is impressed in Character visible<lb/> to all, not excepting the delinquent." If <add>it is</add> hereby <del>the</del><lb/> <del>Author</del> means, that certain actions are generally & <lb/> readily perceived to be hurtful to others it is true<lb/> & it is from conceiving <add>perceiving or <gap/></add> that our indignation <add>judgment of his guilt</add> <add><gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/></add> is produced<lb/> if it be any thing more than a confused <lb/> and <gap/> <gap/> disapprobation. </p> <note>When we can give any reason for it, that is the reason & no other.</note> <pb/> <!-- Here the page is extended by the addition of separate sheet (pinned or stitched? to the first. --> | Tracts (1758) do seem to have made a favourable impression on Bentham...." J.H. Burns, "Bentham and the Scots,"5. http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/658/1/9.5burns_scots.pdf --> VINDICTIVE PRINCIPLE</head> <p> "Upon certain actions hurtful to others the stamp of<lb/> <hi rend='underline'>impropriety</hi> & <hi rend='underline'>wrong</hi> is impressed in Character visible<lb/> to all, not excepting the delinquent." If <add>it is</add> hereby <del>the</del><lb/> <del>Author</del> means, that certain actions are generally & <lb/> readily perceived to be hurtful to others it is true<lb/> & it is from conceiving <add>perceiving or <gap/></add> that our indignation <add>judgment of his guilt</add> <add><gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/></add> is produced<lb/> if it be any thing more than a confused <lb/> and <gap/> <gap/> disapprobation. </p> <note>When we can give any reason for it, that is the reason & no other.</note> <pb/> <!-- Here the page is extended by the addition of separate sheet (pinned or stitched? to the first. --> | ||
<head> PUNISHMENT It's END</head> <note>The treatment of a good man, that is of a man who has tuned his feelings in unison with the <add><gap/></add> public interest, or rather <unclear>insert</unclear><!-- marginal note continues outside the margin at the top of the page above the heading --> it is the natural inconsistency of man & the impossibility of understanding? an <gap/> adherence? to the <gap/> he has taken up that saves him.</note> <p> Resentment is a criterion of right & wrong & why? + <note>+ v. Keymis Hist/ of the Criminal Law that would be to be always in the right, with that of public opinion or the yet <gap/> <add> voice of</add> religion, which is always to mean to be so the <gap/> of such a man & <gap/>, rises at the sight of <gap/>: but --- I know that when a man is angry, he wishes to be thought to be in the right: but I should not have thought in cold blood of saying that he must be so.</note> because<lb/> it usually follows an action prejudicial to the Interest<lb/> of Society — but suppose it produced by an action not<lb/> mischievous? Is it then a criterion of right & wrong?<lb/> no surely — <del>or else</del> what <add>else</add> do we mean by an unjust<lb/> resentment</p> They all <unclear>tacitly</unclear> | <head> PUNISHMENT It's END</head> <note>The treatment of a good man, that is of a man who has tuned his feelings in unison with the <add><gap/></add> public interest, or rather <unclear>insert</unclear><!-- marginal note continues outside the margin at the top of the page above the heading --> it is the natural inconsistency of man & the impossibility of understanding? an <gap/> adherence? to the <gap/> he has taken up that saves him.</note> <p> Resentment is a criterion of right & wrong & why? + <note>+ v. Keymis Hist/ of the Criminal Law that would be to be always in the right, with that of public opinion or the yet <gap/> <add> voice of</add> religion, which is always to mean to be so the <gap/> of such a man & <gap/>, rises at the sight of <gap/>: but --- I know that when a man is angry, he wishes to be thought to be in the right: but I should not have thought in cold blood of saying that he must be so.</note> because<lb/> it usually follows an action prejudicial to the Interest<lb/> of Society — but suppose it produced by an action not<lb/> mischievous? Is it then a criterion of right & wrong?<lb/> no surely — <del>or else</del> what <add>else</add> do we mean by an unjust<lb/> resentment</p> They all <unclear>tacitly</unclear> suppose or refer to some <add><gap/></add> After which it <gap/><lb/> Unless whenever a man is angry, & <del>and</del> apprised of all the facts<lb/> for <unclear>I will</unclear> do it justice if he is in the right, resentment can never <lb/> be a fit criterion to be <gap/> to. <pb/> | ||
<head>PUNISHMENT END. False - Vengeance - Keymis.</head> | <head>PUNISHMENT END. False - Vengeance - Keymis.</head> | ||
PUNISHMENT it's END KEYMIS VINDICTIVE PRINCIPLE
"Upon certain actions hurtful to others the stamp of
impropriety & wrong is impressed in Character visible
to all, not excepting the delinquent." If it is hereby the
Author means, that certain actions are generally &
readily perceived to be hurtful to others it is true
& it is from conceiving perceiving or that our indignation judgment of his guilt is produced
if it be any thing more than a confused
and disapprobation.
When we can give any reason for it, that is the reason & no other.
---page break---
PUNISHMENT It's END The treatment of a good man, that is of a man who has tuned his feelings in unison with the public interest, or rather insert it is the natural inconsistency of man & the impossibility of understanding? an adherence? to the he has taken up that saves him.
Resentment is a criterion of right & wrong & why? + + v. Keymis Hist/ of the Criminal Law that would be to be always in the right, with that of public opinion or the yet voice of religion, which is always to mean to be so the of such a man & , rises at the sight of : but --- I know that when a man is angry, he wishes to be thought to be in the right: but I should not have thought in cold blood of saying that he must be so. because
it usually follows an action prejudicial to the Interest
of Society — but suppose it produced by an action not
mischievous? Is it then a criterion of right & wrong?
no surely — or else what else do we mean by an unjust
resentment
They all tacitly suppose or refer to some After which it
Unless whenever a man is angry, & and apprised of all the facts
for I will do it justice if he is in the right, resentment can never
be a fit criterion to be to.
---page break---
PUNISHMENT END. False - Vengeance - Keymis.
|
Identifier: | JB/096/167/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
096 |
punishment |
||
|
167 |
punishment end false vengeance keymis |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
2 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[partial initials]]] |
||
|
31171 |
|||
