JB/070/250/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/070/250/001: Difference between revisions

TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:


<head>Larceny x Malicious destructions</head>
<head>Larceny x Malicious destructions</head>
<p>Now the objects of the mischief are <gap/> <add>numerically</add> the same in the one as in the other, the mischief <add>less that is</add> <unclear> the</unclear><add><gap/>added text</add>
<p>Now the objects of the mischief are <gap/> <add>numerically</add> the same in the one as in the other, the mischief <add>less that is</add> the</add>
<lb/>
<lb/>
<add>mischief of the l<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> order and</add> same, the <unclear>Terror</unclear>, that is the mischief of 2<hi rend='superscript'><del><unclear>d</unclear></del></hi> &amp; 3<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> and as the same upon the whole <add>+</add><note>+ but how is <add><unclear>Mind</unclear></add> the <sic>resposibity</sic> of the respective Offenders</note>, or if there is any differe  
<add>mischief of the l<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> order and</add> same , the Terror , that is the mischief of 2<hi rend='superscript'><del><unclear>d</unclear></del></hi> &amp; 3<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> orders the same upon the whole <add>+</add><note>+ but how is <add><unclear>Mind</unclear></add> the <sic>resposibity</sic> of the respective Offenders</note>, or if there is any <unclear>differe</unclear><!-- word unfinished, runs off the end of the page and not finished on next line -->
<lb/>
<lb/>
rather greater in the latter than the former: &amp; it is only the motives, which <add><sic>consider'd</sic></add> of themselves are <unclear>a</unclear> <unclear>notion</unclear>
rather greater in the latter than the former: &amp; it is only the motives, which <add><sic>consider'd</sic></add> of themselves are <unclear>a</unclear> <unclear>notion</unclear>
<lb/>
<lb/>
that are different: may if they are to be <sic>consider'd</sic> it is that of the latter <add><del>by</del></add> which is the object <add> <gap/><gap/> <add><gap/></add></add>the <gap/>
that are different: may if they are to be <sic>consider'd</sic> it is that of the latter <add><del>by</del></add> which is the object <add> <gap/><gap/> <add><gap/></add></add> the <gap/>
<lb/>
<lb/>
disapprobation &#x2014; the <add>frequency of the offenders</add> responsibility <add>nearly</add> the same:  I would beseech any one to <!-- symbol or hole in the page? --> revolve all these <unclear>parties</unclear>
disapprobation &#x2014; the <add>frequency of the offenders</add> irresponsibility <add>nearly</add> the same:  I would beseech any one to <hi rend='superscript'><del>o</del></hi> revoke all these <unclear>particul</unclear><!-- I think perhaps meaning to write 'particulars' but again the writing has finished part the way through the word at 'l' and is not finished on the next line -->
<lb/>
<lb/>
<add>&amp; then satisfy himself</add> if he can, why <sic>thier</sic><!-- unusual spelling of there ? --> should be a difference, or rather so many differences, since the one is split in
<add>&amp; then satisfy himself</add> if he can, why <sic>thier</sic><!-- unusual spelling of there ? --> should be a difference, or rather so many differences, since the one is split in
<lb/>
<lb/>
so many varieties, in the punishment.  The same guard <add>&#x2014; in <gap/> <gap/></add> which is set to distinguish &amp; reason the
so many varieties, in the punishment.  The same guard <add>&#x2014; in or <gap/></add> which is set to distinguish &amp; reason the
<lb/>
<lb/>
servant may be <add>in <gap/> <add>over the <gap/></add></add>; and by the <unclear>depiction</unclear> given is, established in <add>over</add> the other   
servant may be <add>in use <add>over the <unclear>use</unclear></add></add>; and by the depiction given is, established in <add>over</add> the other   
<lb/></p>
<lb/></p>



Revision as of 15:11, 21 March 2011

Click Here To Edit


Larceny x Malicious destructions

Now the objects of the mischief are numerically the same in the one as in the other, the mischief less that is the</add>
mischief of the lst order and same , the Terror , that is the mischief of 2d & 3d orders the same upon the whole ++ but how is Mind the resposibity of the respective Offenders, or if there is any differe
rather greater in the latter than the former: & it is only the motives, which consider'd of themselves are a notion
that are different: may if they are to be consider'd it is that of the latter by which is the object <add></add> the
disapprobation — the frequency of the offenders irresponsibility nearly the same: I would beseech any one to o revoke all these particul
& then satisfy himself if he can, why thier should be a difference, or rather so many differences, since the one is split in
so many varieties, in the punishment. The same guard — in or which is set to distinguish & reason the
servant may be in use <add>over the use</add>; and by the depiction given is, established in over the other


Deer

THEFT. Deer.



Identifier: | JB/070/250/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 70.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

070

Main Headings

of laws in general

Folio number

250

Info in main headings field

larceny - deer

Image

001

Titles

note continued

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c7 /

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::j honig & zoonen [lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

cc1

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23365

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in