JB/002/430/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/002/430/001: Difference between revisions

RichardDavis (talk | contribs)
m 1 revision: Importing all JB pages from Main Namespace on Testwiki
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Art. 15.</head>
<note>Notes  39  Annuity Notes  26  430 <!-- in pencil --></note>
 
the difference in the two cases is matter of accident, <lb>
however, and does not arise out of any difference <lb>
in the nature of the two cases. The persons employed<lb>
<del>under the Post Office</del> <add>as Vendors of Stamps</add> <add>Receivor of Letters</add>  are shopkeepers: the <lb>
persons employ'd as Receivors of Letters are shopkeepers <lb>
of a higher class: <add>a class not inferior to the other</add><lb>
this same sort  of persons are the persons employ'd in<lb>
both instances: the business of the Receiver and Vendor<lb>
of transfer is not more complicated, in any degree<lb>
<del><unclear>nor</unclear></del> capable of influencing the point in question<lb>
than that of the Receivor and Forwarder of Letters.<lb>
the persons employ'd about the Letters are Shopkeepers:<lb>
the persons employ'd about the stamps<lb>
are Shopkeepers of the same class, and frequently<lb>
the same individuals. It is not more difficult<lb>
to count stamps than to count letters: nor to<lb>
count money <del>produced</del> found in the one account<lb>
than money found in the other. There are indeed<lb>
more varieties in the sums ? in account<lb>
of stamps than in the same received in<lb>
account of letters. So thus the account is in a <lb>
proportionate degree more complicated. But in<lb>
each <del>case</del> <add>instance</add> the sum to be taken  on account<lb>
of a stamp in x indicator in the frame? of the stamp<lb>
itself: so that the xcomplication +difficulty is much less/ is beyond comparison<lb>
un less in the instance of this Government<lb>
x commodity, than +it is/ in the instance of the xthat<lb>
xin the/ private stock (which forms +constitutes the subject-matter<lb>
of the dealings) of the meanest? shopkeeper.<lb>
 
 





Revision as of 03:41, 9 January 2011

File:JB 002 430 001.jpg

Click Here To Edit

Art. 15. Notes 39 Annuity Notes 26 430

the difference in the two cases is matter of accident, <lb> however, and does not arise out of any difference <lb> in the nature of the two cases. The persons employed<lb> under the Post Office as Vendors of Stamps Receivor of Letters are shopkeepers: the <lb> persons employ'd as Receivors of Letters are shopkeepers <lb> of a higher class: a class not inferior to the other<lb> this same sort of persons are the persons employ'd in<lb> both instances: the business of the Receiver and Vendor<lb> of transfer is not more complicated, in any degree<lb> nor capable of influencing the point in question<lb> than that of the Receivor and Forwarder of Letters.<lb> the persons employ'd about the Letters are Shopkeepers:<lb> the persons employ'd about the stamps<lb> are Shopkeepers of the same class, and frequently<lb> the same individuals. It is not more difficult<lb> to count stamps than to count letters: nor to<lb> count money produced found in the one account<lb> than money found in the other. There are indeed<lb> more varieties in the sums ? in account<lb> of stamps than in the same received in<lb> account of letters. So thus the account is in a <lb> proportionate degree more complicated. But in<lb> each case instance the sum to be taken on account<lb> of a stamp in x indicator in the frame? of the stamp<lb> itself: so that the xcomplication +difficulty is much less/ is beyond comparison<lb> un less in the instance of this Government<lb> x commodity, than +it is/ in the instance of the xthat<lb> xin the/ private stock (which forms +constitutes the subject-matter<lb> of the dealings) of the meanest? shopkeeper.<lb>





Identifier: | JB/002/430/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 2.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

002

Main Headings

annuity notes

Folio number

430

Info in main headings field

art. 15

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f35

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

1798 a<…>

Marginals

Paper Producer

frances wright

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1798

Notes public

ID Number

1169

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in