JB/096/005/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/096/005/002: Difference between revisions

TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p><add>thus binding upon all. <del>I have a sort</del> And yet I have a<del>n</del><lb/>sort of <sic>pressentiment</sic> that our author will be as much</add>
<p>thus binding upon all. And were we <add>thus binding upon all. <del>I have a sort</del> And yet I have a<del>n</del><lb/>sort of <sic>pressentiment</sic> that our author will be as much</add>
<lb/>
<lb/>
thus binding upon all. And were we
even to suppose, what, after this account <add>puzzled to tell us, what this law of Nature is, as of old</add>
<lb/>
<lb/>
<add>puzzled to tell us, what this law of Nature is, as of old</add>
of it, is too much to suppose, that here, and <add><del>The</del> Recorder of London was puzzled to tell William</add>
<lb/>
<lb/>
even to suppose, what, after this account<lb/>
there an individual, had not arrived at <add>Penn<hi rend='superscript'>#</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>#</hi>See trial of William Penn &amp; William <sic>Mead</sic> at the <del>new</del> <add>old</add> <del>1670</del> <sic>Bayley</sic>. a. d. -<del><gap/></del> 1670</note> what the common Law was, <del>who</del> <add>This "troublesome and impertinent fellow to use the</add></add>
<add><del>The</del> Recorder of London was puzzled to tell William</add>
<lb/>
the knowledge of it: still in every nation:&#x2014;  <add><del>working recording words was <unclear>impertinent</unclear> enough</del> <add>words of that humane Recorder/ took it into his head,</add></add>
<lb/>
in every large assemblage of men, <sic>thism</sic> <add><del>So believe</del> that <del>common</del> <add>a</add> law which <del>war</del> <add>even</add> after thirty or forty years study <add>a<del>man</del> can not make</add> <del>could not be made</del>intelligible to a common ca-pacity, <del>was</del>was </add>
<lb/>
<del>would be seen some <gap/> Principles</del> <add>will must be known must <del>be</del> be allowed</add> <add>added text</add> <add><del>hard to believe</del> <add><del>be</del></add> <del>understand could not with any</del></add>
<lb/>
<del>some permanent maxim, which could <add>In a word, it must make</add></del> <add>not a <del>proprity be called</del> <hi rend='underline'>common Law</hi> <del>only by some</del>
<lb/>
<del>be</del> the common ground work of every legislation <add>to be the quaint conceit <add>the one</add> of <del>an</del> etymologist &#x2014; <add>who derived</add> <del>as</del><foreign>lucus a' non lucendo</foreign><!-- Latin, translation:[it is] a grove by not being light-->.</add>
<lb/>
upon earth: <del>There would be some one</del> <add>It must be the one</add> <add><add>But as to</add> <del>As</del> this law of Nature; <add>it <del>which</del> was coeval with & to be binding over all mankind. </add> <del>was coeval with mankind <gap/></del><add>it</add> was dictated</add>
<lb/>
<lb/>
of it, is too much to suppose, that here, and
general Criterion, to which all nations <del>would</del> <add>do</add>  <add>by a Legislator, who could neither err himself, nor lead others into
error, <del>we shall certainly find it in</del> <add><del>that</del></add> every nation in every <unclear>large</unclear></add>
<lb/>
appeal as the measure of right, and wrong. <add><del>assemblage men, has preserved it as the common groundwork of all every their</del> <add><del>its</del></add> <del> own laws, and appeals to it as the general criterion of</del></add>
<lb/>
Before our Author can <del>take to himself</del><add>assume</add> the credit <add>right and wrong</add>
<lb/>  
<lb/>  
 
<del>Now where are we to look for this; shall we </del>
<add>Penn<hi rend='superscript'>#</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>#</hi>See trial of William Penn &amp; William <sic>Mead</sic> at the <del>new</del> <add>old</add> <del>1670</del> <sic>Bayley</sic>. a. d. -<del><gap/></del> 1670</note> what the common Law was, <del>who</del> <add>This "troublesome and impertinent fellow to use the</add></add>
<lb/>
<lb/>
<hi rend='underline'>of having </hi> found out this <del>general criterion, he must</del><add>great law of nature, universally </add>
there an individual, had not arrived at
<lb/>
<note>binding and universally obeyed</note>
take a wider circuit than the narrow limits of a little island.
<lb/>
<lb/>
<add><del>working recording words was <unclear>impertinent</unclear> enough</del> <add>words of that humane Recorder/ took it into his head,</add></add>
Let him go to Sparta, where theft was <del>permitted,</del> allowed, <del>may</del> <add>applauded</add>
<lb/>  
<lb/>  
the knowledge of it: still in every nation:-<lb/><add><del>So believe</del><hi rend='superscript'><gap/></hi> that <del>common</del><hi rend='superscript'>a</hi> law which <del>war</del><hi rend='superscript'>even</hi> after thirty</add><lb/><add>or forty years study</add> <hi rend='superscript'>a<del>man</del> can not make</hi><add><del>could not be made</del>intelligible to a common ca-pacity, <del>was</del>was<lb/></add><add>
<add><del>Unluckily our Author has not told us in what</del><add>We</add></add>
judge</add><lb/>
 
in every large assemblage of men, <sic>thism</sic><lb/><add><del>hard to believe</del> <hi rend='superscript'><del>be</del></hi><del>understand could not with any</del></add><lb/>will must be known: must <del><gap/></del> be allowed.<lb/><del>would be seen some <gap/> Principles</del> <add>and <gap/><gap/> the name does seem</add><lb/>
 
<add>not a <del><gap/> be called</del> <hi rend='underline'>common Law</hi>^ <del>only by some</del></add><lb/> In a word, it must make<lb/><del>some permanent maxim, which would</del><lb/><add>to be the quaint conceit <hi rend='superscript'>the one</hi> of <del>an</del> entymologist -^<hi rend='superscript'>who derived</hi> <del>as</del><foreign>lucus a' non lucendo</foreign><!-- Latin, translation:[it is] a grove by not being light-->.</add><lb/>
 
<del>be</del> the common ground work of every legis<lb/><add><hi rend='superscript'><gap/> as to</hi> <del>As</del> this law of Nature; <hi rend='superscript'>it <del>which</del> was coeval with & to be binding over all mankind. </hi><del>coeval with mankind <gap/></del><hi rend='superscript'>it</hi> was dictated</add><lb/> lation upon earth: <del>There would be some one</del><hi rend='superscript'>It must be the one</hi><lb/>
 
<add>by a Legislator, who could neither err himself, nor lead others into<lb/> error, <del>we shall certainly find it in</del><hi rend='superscript'><del>that</del></hi> every nation in every <unclear>large</unclear></add><lb/> general Criterion, to which all nations <del>would</del><add>do</add><lb/>
 
<add><del>assemblage men, has preserved it as the common groundwork of all</del></add><lb/><add><del>every their</del></add><hi rend='superscript'><del>its</del></hi><add><del> own laws, and appeals to it as the general criterion of</del></add><lb/> appeal as the measure of right and wrong.<lb/><add><del>right & wrong</del></add><lb/> Before our Author can <del>take to himself</del><add>assume</add> the credit<lb/> <del>Now where are we to look for this; shall we </del><lb/> <hi rend='underline'>of having </hi> found out this <del>general criterion, he must</del><add>great law of nature, universally </add><lb/><note><add>binding and universally obeyed</add></note> <add>he must</add> take a wider circuit than the narrow limits of a little island.<lb/> Let him go to Sparta, where theft was <del>permitted,</del> allowed, <del>may</del><lb/> applauded<lb/><add><del>Unluckily our Author has not told us in what</del></add><lb/>16 We
 
 





Revision as of 10:39, 18 January 2011

Click Here To Edit

thus binding upon all. And were we thus binding upon all. I have a sort And yet I have an
sort of pressentiment that our author will be as much

even to suppose, what, after this account puzzled to tell us, what this law of Nature is, as of old
of it, is too much to suppose, that here, and The Recorder of London was puzzled to tell William
there an individual, had not arrived at Penn# <note>#See trial of William Penn & William Mead at the new <add>old 1670 Bayley. a. d. - 1670</note> what the common Law was, who This "troublesome and impertinent fellow to use the</add>
the knowledge of it: still in every nation:— working recording words was impertinent enough <add>words of that humane Recorder/ took it into his head,</add>
in every large assemblage of men, thism So believe that common <add>a law which war even after thirty or forty years study aman can not make could not be madeintelligible to a common ca-pacity, waswas </add>
would be seen some Principles will must be known must be be allowed added text hard to believe <add>be understand could not with any</add>
some permanent maxim, which could In a word, it must make not a proprity be called common Law only by some
be the common ground work of every legislation <add>to be the quaint conceit <add>the one
of an etymologist — who derived aslucus a' non lucendo.</add>
upon earth: There would be some one It must be the one <add>But as to As this law of Nature; it which was coeval with & to be binding over all mankind. was coeval with mankind it was dictated</add>
general Criterion, to which all nations would do by a Legislator, who could neither err himself, nor lead others into error, we shall certainly find it in <add>that every nation in every large</add>
appeal as the measure of right, and wrong. assemblage men, has preserved it as the common groundwork of all every their <add>its own laws, and appeals to it as the general criterion of</add>
Before our Author can take to himselfassume the credit right and wrong
Now where are we to look for this; shall we
of having found out this general criterion, he mustgreat law of nature, universally
binding and universally obeyed take a wider circuit than the narrow limits of a little island.
Let him go to Sparta, where theft was permitted, allowed, may applauded
Unluckily our Author has not told us in what<add>We</add>

Identifier: | JB/096/005/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

096

Main Headings

comment on the commentaries

Folio number

005

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

section ii / of the authors account of the laws of nature

Category

collectanea

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c15 / c16 / c17 / c18

Penner

168

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [quartered royal arms motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

[[notes_public::"to be copied" [note not in bentham's hand]]]

ID Number

31009

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in