JB/096/005/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/096/005/002: Difference between revisions

TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
JFoxe (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p>thus binding upon all. And were we <add>thus binding upon all. <del>I have a sort</del> And yet I have a<del>n</del><lb/>sort of <sic>pressentiment</sic> that our author will be as much</add>
<pb/>
<lb/>
 
even to suppose, what, after this account <add>puzzled to tell us, what this law of Nature is, as of old</add>
<p> thus binding upon all. <del>I have a sort</del> And yet I have a<del>n</del><lb/>
<lb/>
sort of <sic>pressentiment</sic> that our Author will be as much<lb/>
of it, is too much to suppose, that here, and <add><del>The</del> Recorder of London was puzzled to tell William</add>
puzzled to tell us, what this law of Nature is, as of old<lb/>
<lb/>
<del>the</del> <add>a</add> Recorder of London was puzzled to tell William<lb/>
there an individual, had not arrived at <add>Penn<hi rend='superscript'>#</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>#</hi>See trial of William Penn &amp; William <sic>Mead</sic> at the <del>new</del> <add>old</add> <del>1670</del> <sic>Bayley</sic>. a. d. -<del><gap/></del> 1670</note> what the common Law was, <del>who</del> <add>This "troublesome and impertinent fellow to use the</add></add>
Penn <note>See trial of William Penn &amp; William Mead at the <del>new</del> <add>old</add> <del>1670</del> Bayley. A. D. - <del><gap/></del> 1670</note> what the common Law was, <del>who</del> <add>This "troublesome and impertinent Fellow"</add> to use the<lb/>  
<lb/>  
<del>worthy recorders words was impertinent enough</del> <add>words of that humane Recorder/ took it into his head,</add><lb/>  
the knowledge of it: still in every nation:&#x2014;  <add><del>working recording words was <unclear>impertinent</unclear> enough</del> <add>words of that humane Recorder/ took it into his head,</add></add>
<del>to believe</del> that <del>common</del> <add>a</add> law which <del>was</del> <add>even</add> after thirty<lb/>
<lb/>  
or forty years study <add>a <del>man</del> can not make</add> <del>could not be made</del> intelligible to a common capacity, <del>was</del> was<lb/>
in every large assemblage of men, <sic>thism</sic> <add><del>So believe</del> that <del>common</del> <add>a</add> law which <del>war</del> <add>even</add> after thirty or forty years study <add>a<del>man</del> can not make</add> <del>could not be made</del>intelligible to a common ca-pacity, <del>was</del>was </add>
<del>hard to believe</del> <add><del>be</del></add> <del>understand could not with any</del><lb/>
<lb/>
not a <del>propriety be called</del> <hi rend='underline'>common Law</hi> <add>and to say truth the name does seem</add> <del>only by some</del><lb/>
<del>would be seen some <gap/> Principles</del> <add>will must be known must <del>be</del> be allowed</add> <add>added text</add> <add><del>hard to believe</del> <add><del>be</del></add> <del>understand could not with any</del></add>
to be the quaint conceit of <del>an</del> <add>the one</add> etymologist &#x2014; <add>who derived</add> <del>as</del> <foreign>lucus a non lucendo</foreign><!-- Latin, translation:[it is] a grove by not being light-->.<lb/>
<lb/>
<add>But as to</add> <del>As</del> this law of Nature; <add>it <del>which</del> was coeval with, &amp;& to be binding over all mankind. </add> <del>was coeval with mankind &amp;</del> <add>it</add> was dictated<lb/>
<del>some permanent maxim, which could <add>In a word, it must make</add></del> <add>not a <del>propriety be called</del> <hi rend='underline'>common Law</hi> <del>only by some</del> <add>and to say truth the name does seem</add></add>
by a Legislator, who could neither err himself, nor lead others into<lb/>
<lb/>
error, <del>we shall certainly find it in</del> <add><del>that</del></add> <del>every nation in every large</del><lb/>
<del>be</del> the common ground work of every legislation <add>to be the quaint conceit <add>the one</add> of <del>an</del> etymologist &#x2014; <add>who derived</add> <del>as</del><foreign>lucus a' non lucendo</foreign><!-- Latin, translation:[it is] a grove by not being light-->.</add>
<del>assemblage men, has preserved it as the common groundwork of all</del><lb/>
<lb/>
<del>every their</del> <add><del>its</del></add> <del>own laws, and appeals to it as the general Criterion of</del></add>
upon earth: <del>There would be some one</del> <add>It must be the one</add> <add><add>But as to</add> <del>As</del> this law of Nature; <add>it <del>which</del> was coeval with & to be binding over all mankind. </add> <del>was coeval with mankind <gap/></del><add>it</add> was dictated</add>
<lb/>
general Criterion, to which all nations <del>would</del> <add>do</add>  <add>by a Legislator, who could neither err himself, nor lead others into
error, <del>we shall certainly find it in</del> <add><del>that</del></add> every nation in every <unclear>large</unclear></add>
<lb/>
appeal as the measure of right, and wrong. <add><del>assemblage men, has preserved it as the common groundwork of all every their</del> <add><del>its</del></add> <del> own laws, and appeals to it as the general criterion of</del></add>
<lb/>
<lb/>
Before our Author can <del>take to himself</del><add>assume</add> the credit <add>right and wrong</add>
<del>right and wrong.</del><lb/>
<lb/>
<del>Now where are we to look for this; shall we </del>
<lb/>
<hi rend='underline'>of having </hi> found out this <del>general criterion, he must</del><add>great law of nature, universally </add>
<lb/>
<note>binding and universally obeyed</note>
take a wider circuit than the narrow limits of a little island.
<lb/>
Let him go to Sparta, where theft was <del>permitted,</del> allowed, <del>nay</del> <add>applauded</add>
<lb/>  
<add><del>Unluckily our Author has not told us in what</del><add>We</add></add></p>
<add><del>Unluckily our Author has not told us in what</del><add>We</add></add></p>


<pb/>




thus binding upon all. And were we<lb/>
even to suppose, what, after this account<lb/>
of it, is too much to suppose, that here, and<lb/>
there an individual, had not arrived at<lb/>
the knowledge of it: still in every nation:<lb/>
in every large assemblage of men, this <gap/><lb/>
will must be known: must <del>be</del> be allowed.<lb/>
<del>would be seen some <unclear>ruling</unclear> Principles</del><lb/>
In a word, it must make<lb/>
<del>some permanent maxim, which would</del> <lb/>
<del>be</del> the common ground work of every legislation<lb/>
upon earth: <del>There would be some one</del> <add>It must be the one</add><lb/>
general Criterion, to which all nations <del>would</del> <add>do</add><lb/>
appeal as the measure of right, and wrong.<lb/>
Before our Author can <del>take to himself</del> <add>assume</add> the credit<lb/>
<del>Now where are we to look for this; shall we </del><lb/>
<hi rend='underline'>of having </hi> found out this <del>general criterion, he must</del> <add>great law of Nature, universally </add>
<lb/>
<add>binding &amp; universally obeyed he must</add> take a wider circuit than the narrow limits of a little Island.<lb/>
Let him go to Sparta, where theft was <del>permitted,</del> allowed, <del>nay</del> <add>applauded</add>


16)


 
<pb/>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 





Revision as of 16:15, 21 January 2012

Click Here To Edit


---page break---

thus binding upon all. I have a sort And yet I have an
sort of pressentiment that our Author will be as much
puzzled to tell us, what this law of Nature is, as of old
the a Recorder of London was puzzled to tell William
Penn See trial of William Penn & William Mead at the new old 1670 Bayley. A. D. - 1670 what the common Law was, who This "troublesome and impertinent Fellow" to use the
worthy recorders words was impertinent enough words of that humane Recorder/ took it into his head,
to believe that common a law which was even after thirty
or forty years study a man can not make could not be made intelligible to a common capacity, was was
hard to believe be understand could not with any
not a propriety be called common Law and to say truth the name does seem only by some
to be the quaint conceit of an the one etymologist — who derived as lucus a non lucendo.
But as to As this law of Nature; it which was coeval with, && to be binding over all mankind. was coeval with mankind & it was dictated
by a Legislator, who could neither err himself, nor lead others into
error, we shall certainly find it in that every nation in every large
assemblage men, has preserved it as the common groundwork of all
every their its own laws, and appeals to it as the general Criterion of</add>
right and wrong.
Unluckily our Author has not told us in what<add>We</add>


---page break---


thus binding upon all. And were we
even to suppose, what, after this account
of it, is too much to suppose, that here, and
there an individual, had not arrived at
the knowledge of it: still in every nation:
in every large assemblage of men, this
will must be known: must be be allowed.
would be seen some ruling Principles
In a word, it must make
some permanent maxim, which would
be the common ground work of every legislation
upon earth: There would be some one It must be the one
general Criterion, to which all nations would do
appeal as the measure of right, and wrong.
Before our Author can take to himself assume the credit
Now where are we to look for this; shall we
of having found out this general criterion, he must great law of Nature, universally
binding & universally obeyed he must take a wider circuit than the narrow limits of a little Island.
Let him go to Sparta, where theft was permitted, allowed, nay applauded

16)


---page break---




Identifier: | JB/096/005/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

096

Main Headings

comment on the commentaries

Folio number

005

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

section ii / of the authors account of the laws of nature

Category

collectanea

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c15 / c16 / c17 / c18

Penner

168

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [quartered royal arms motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

[[notes_public::"to be copied" [note not in bentham's hand]]]

ID Number

31009

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in