JB/107/277/001

Click Here To Edit

Thus in the particular case above spoken of, where
where the object of the proposed law was to take awayout of
from the hands by which it is at present
exercised the arbitrary power of life and death.
ing when it is thus custom to spare it,
leaving it in the power to sacrifice it in those
cases only in which it is thus custom to take really
into consideration whether they shall or shall not
sacrifice it, of the above mentioned opinion of Lord Camden were
to be received as authority and that authority
as decisive would be to pass bestow approbation
and acceptance in the above mentioned proposed law, to apply
censure and in of the strongest terms kind to the existing
practice: to rank under in the class of tyrants all
by whom the existing practice is persevered in, and
in the class of adherents of tyrants all these by
when it has been or is defended.

---page break---

Identifier: | JB/107/277/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 107.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	107	Main Headings	fallacies; law versus arbitrary power (a hatchet for dr paley's net)
Folio number	277	Info in main headings field
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	c6
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	th 1806
Marginals		Paper Producer	andre morellet
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1806
Notes public		ID Number	35268
Box Contents