★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
' | <p>_[5]</p> <head> INTRODUCTION.<head> <!-- at right angles along the left hand edge of the page --> <p><sic>INTRODUCT.</sic> A Law — what? Parts of a Law [1][1] <sic>Blackst<hi rend="superscript">s</hi></sic> <gap/> — Radical & <sic>Subserv</sic></p> <p>For an abstraction to be accurate, a man should have the <gap/> from<lb/>lying before him while the abstraction <add> operation</add> is performing. Instead of that more<lb/> men take up with a hasty & incorrect picture of it in their minds<lb/> drawn from an recollection</p> <p> A man sets about to explain a Law — he gives his definitions — Is it<lb/> just? Here is but one way to know — try it upon <hi rend="underline">a Law</hi>, <del><gap/></del> <add> upon <del>what</del></add><lb/>something <add.to</add> which men are agreed in giving the name of Law — be it upon<lb/> the 1<hi rend="superscript">st</hi> that offers, try it upon another, <del>I</del> be ready to try it upon<lb/>every one concerning which any suspicion can arise if it's <del>having any</del> <add> being different</add><lb/><del>permitted</del> <add>in any</add> respect from those told already in the particulars <sic>exprest</sic> in the<lb/>depiction.</p> <!-- start of section crossed through in ink and bracketed to the right --> <p>A painter has a plant to draw what does he? draw it from the recollection)<lb/>he has of it as he saw it growing in the garden? no he plucks it up<lb/>brings it with him & spreads it out before him under his eyes — Has he any<lb/>doubt to at ant time concerning the exactness of<lb/> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
_[5]
<head> INTRODUCTION.<head>
INTRODUCT. A Law — what? Parts of a Law [1][1] Blacksts — Radical & Subserv
For an abstraction to be accurate, a man should have the from
lying before him while the abstraction operation is performing. Instead of that more
men take up with a hasty & incorrect picture of it in their minds
drawn from an recollection
A man sets about to explain a Law — he gives his definitions — Is it
just? Here is but one way to know — try it upon a Law, upon what
something <add.to</add> which men are agreed in giving the name of Law — be it upon
the 1st that offers, try it upon another, I be ready to try it upon
every one concerning which any suspicion can arise if it's having any being different
permitted in any respect from those told already in the particulars exprest in the
depiction.
A painter has a plant to draw what does he? draw it from the recollection)
he has of it as he saw it growing in the garden? no he plucks it up
brings it with him & spreads it out before him under his eyes — Has he any
doubt to at ant time concerning the exactness of
|
Identifier: | JB/063/051/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 63. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
063 |
law in general |
||
|
051 |
ch…parts of a law - laws substantive and adjective |
||
|
004 |
|||
|
copy/fair copy sheet |
4 |
||
|
recto |
f2 / f3 / f4 / f5 |
||
|
[[watermarks::l v g propatria [britannia motif]]] |
|||
|
caroline vernon |
|||
|
20240 |
|||
