★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
'' | <head>EXEMPTIONS INFANCY. <hi rend="superscript">2</hi></head> <p>The Doctrine & the Language <add> of the Law on this land</add> of the <del>Law on this land</del> <add>Writers</add> <lb/> are far from being satisfactory<lb/>They divide <add>for this purpose<a/dd> the State of Infancy into <del>two</del> <add>3</add> Periods — <del>One</del> <add>The first</add> from the birth <sic>till</sic> 7 years<lb/>of age — the second from thence to fourteen <add>14</add> — <add> the 3<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> from thence to 21</add> Within the first <add>without any hesitation</add> they establish<lb/> absolute <del>irresponsibility</del> <add> impunity</add>; <sic>tho'</sic> <del>in</del> <add> the</add> fact <add>is,</add> this is a new point & has never been decided. <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi><lb/><note>[+]<lb/> So a new point & has never been decided<lb/> But as the Judges, <sic>abandon'd</sic> to themselves<lb/> by the Legislature must decide <add>if it become a question</add> somehow <lb/>or other, we may <add>give a pretty good</add> guess how they<lb/> would decide it, were it to come<lb/> before them; & <add>conclude</add> that the slightest<lb/> & most obscure Authority <del> no <add>as was</add> way</del><lb/>opposed by reason, would determine<lb/> them to [fix <add>accede to</add> the period of absolute<lb/> irresponsibility according to]the prevailing notion.</note><lb/>Between the first and second they establish "<foreign><hi rend="underline">prima facie</hi></foreign> (as there language is) an impunity;<lb/> that is, that punishment <add>a verdict of <del>Guilty</del> conviction</add> shall not <del>follow</del> <add> be received</add> upon the simple proof of the fact<lb/>But they allow of <del>the occurring of the Verdict of conviction</del> <add> it's being received</add> in certain cases<lb/>that is wherever there is express proof of "<sic>canniving</sic>" <hi rend="superscript">+</hi> "malice" <hi rend="superscript"># *</hi> "<foreign>dolus</foreign> <hi rend="superscript">*</hi> "consciousness of<lb/>guilt" <hi rend="superscript">#</hi> <add>discretion *</add>, mischievous discretion <hi rend="superscript">#</hi> <del><gap/></del> expressions upon which they ring the changes, <add>as if their meaning was the same</add> & which<lb/> they consider as synonymous. <add>meaning the same thing</add> When the cases on which they found these conclusions come <add>to</add> <lb/>be examined into, it turns out that in all of them the Culprits after the commission<lb/> of the crime took artful measures to conceal it: <hi rend="superscript">+</hi> a circumstance which <del>seems</del> <add>in truth appears</add> to afford<lb/> conclusive proof of their <add>sensibility &</add> apprehension of punishment, & consequently of the utility<lb/> of extending it to their respective ages. But the <add>import of the</add> term malice is [here, as <add>in this case as</add><lb/><add>throughout the Law</add> in all other cases where used in Law] very loose & fallacious; for if by Malice be meant the <add>an</add> appetite for another's pain, <hi rend="underline">that</hi> will be found to subsist in children<lb/> of the most tender age. Before <delthey</del> <Add><del>they</del>we</add> are trusted out of their Cradle or their Nurse's<lb/>arms & consequently before <del>we</del> <add>they we</add> are able to do any sort of mischief; we catch that <add>appetite</add><lb/>from <del>the perpetual incitement to beat the person around us upon any Little <unclear>dispute</unclear></del> <add>their encouragement & example, & shall/will continue to do so so long as Nurses are</add> <lb/>Nurses & not Philosophers. Every body must have observed <del>Nurses for the <unclear>sake of</unclear> <gap/></del> <add>how frequent an amusement it is a</add><lb/> <del>themselves sport <gap/> them</del> <add>Nurse to incite</add> her little charge to gratify it's pique against a bystander<lb/>has offended it by beating him & pretending <del>to beat him herself.</del> <add>to lend it her assistance</add> If Malice therefore were<lb/> allowed to take a case out of the exemption, it would frustrate it altogether.<add>they will confine it, within much narrower limits than those which they have assigned. [+]<lb/><note>[+] And as its' <add>the</add> preserve ought not <add>of this distinction alone</add> <lb/> itself to preclude from, <gap/> so <add><gap/></add> ought<lb/> not its absence alone to <gap/> to the<lb/> exemption: for as the mischief of<lb?>firing houses for instance is equally<lb/> great so <del>ought</del> <add>is the</add> necessity of compating<lb/> it equally strong, whether it<lb/> be done for the sake of wrecking <add> giving pain</add> <lb/>vengeance on <add>to</add> those that belong to it<lb/> or merely from that disposition to<lb/> experiment which is so strong in us<lb?> upon our first <gap/> into this<lb?> <gap/> of things. — I see not that at<lb/> the age at which some children have been <!-- continues into main text area --> put to death [by sentence of the Law] it could be more certain that the vindictive any more than the experimental <unclear>desire</unclear><lb/> would <unclear>continue</unclear><note></p> | ||
EXEMPTIONS INFANCY. 2
The Doctrine & the Language of the Law on this land of the Law on this land Writers
are far from being satisfactory
They divide for this purpose<a/dd> the State of Infancy into two <add>3 Periods — One The first from the birth till 7 years
of age — the second from thence to fourteen 14 — the 3d from thence to 21 Within the first without any hesitation they establish
absolute irresponsibility impunity; tho' in the fact is, this is a new point & has never been decided. [+]
[+]
So a new point & has never been decided
But as the Judges, abandon'd to themselves
by the Legislature must decide if it become a question somehow
or other, we may give a pretty good guess how they
would decide it, were it to come
before them; & conclude that the slightest
& most obscure Authority no as was way
opposed by reason, would determine
them to [fix accede to the period of absolute
irresponsibility according to]the prevailing notion.
Between the first and second they establish "prima facie (as there language is) an impunity;
that is, that punishment a verdict of Guilty conviction shall not follow be received upon the simple proof of the fact
But they allow of the occurring of the Verdict of conviction it's being received in certain cases
that is wherever there is express proof of "canniving" + "malice" # * "dolus * "consciousness of
guilt" # discretion *, mischievous discretion # expressions upon which they ring the changes, as if their meaning was the same & which
they consider as synonymous. meaning the same thing When the cases on which they found these conclusions come to
be examined into, it turns out that in all of them the Culprits after the commission
of the crime took artful measures to conceal it: + a circumstance which seems in truth appears to afford
conclusive proof of their sensibility & apprehension of punishment, & consequently of the utility
of extending it to their respective ages. But the import of the term malice is [here, as in this case as
throughout the Law in all other cases where used in Law] very loose & fallacious; for if by Malice be meant the an appetite for another's pain, that will be found to subsist in children
of the most tender age. Before <delthey theywe are trusted out of their Cradle or their Nurse's
arms & consequently before we they we are able to do any sort of mischief; we catch that appetite
from the perpetual incitement to beat the person around us upon any Little dispute their encouragement & example, & shall/will continue to do so so long as Nurses are
Nurses & not Philosophers. Every body must have observed Nurses for the sake of how frequent an amusement it is a
themselves sport them Nurse to incite her little charge to gratify it's pique against a bystander
has offended it by beating him & pretending to beat him herself. to lend it her assistance If Malice therefore were
allowed to take a case out of the exemption, it would frustrate it altogether.they will confine it, within much narrower limits than those which they have assigned. [+]
<note>[+] And as its' <add>the preserve ought not of this distinction alone
itself to preclude from, so ought
not its absence alone to to the
exemption: for as the mischief of<lb?>firing houses for instance is equally
great so ought is the necessity of compating
it equally strong, whether it
be done for the sake of wrecking giving pain
vengeance on to those that belong to it
or merely from that disposition to
experiment which is so strong in us<lb?> upon our first into this<lb?> of things. — I see not that at
the age at which some children have been put to death [by sentence of the Law] it could be more certain that the vindictive any more than the experimental desire
would continue<note>
Identifier: | JB/063/153/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 63. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
063 |
law in general |
||
153 |
exemptions infancy |
||
002 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
c2 |
||
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]] |
||
20342 |
|||