JB/120/089/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/120/089/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
ChrisRiley (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Of Long and Forgery</head>
 
<p>12 May 1802</p>
 
<note>Times 27 May 1802. Evidence suppression punished with 6 months imprisonment.</note>
<p>At the very title of this section, I see Your Lordship<lb/>
start: on the one hand a man high in Office<lb/>
doing that sort of thing, for which a man deserves a halter <add>by which so many <gap/> <del>obtain</del> wretches obtain</add>:<lb/>
or on the other hand a man {<del>hitherto</del> once thought worthy of<lb/>
being <add>in</add> office, and} hitherto without reproach, saying that<lb/>
sort of thing for which, if it were false, or at any rate<lb/>
if he did not believe it to be true, he would deserve the<lb/>
pillory.</p>
<p>A sad alternative <add>in truth</add> were it the only only: <add>fortunately</add> but happily<lb/>
there is neither halter nor pillory in this case.</p>
<p>That I accuse M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Long: now for the Right Honourable<lb/>
Charles Long of forgery is true enough: but it is not<lb/>
precisely that sort of thing which has <add>been presented to</add> <del>occurred to your</del><lb/>
Your Lordship conception by the letters of which the word forgery<lb/>
<add>Lordship in the first</add><lb/>
is composed. It is not <hi rend="underline">positive</hi> forgery that I accuse<lb/>
him of: it is nothing more than <hi rend="underline">negative</hi>: of that sort<lb/>
of act which, were it not for the warrant <add>which Your Lordship will find me in possession of</add> I possess<lb/>
I should have contented myself with calling by <add>the</add> fable and<lb/>
imperfectly expressive compound denomination of
<hi rend="underline">suppression<lb/>
of evidence.</hi></p>
<p>It may appear to Your Lordship that notwithstanding<lb/>
this explanation the appellation is an unwarrantable<lb/>
one: that it is the offspring of that sort of passion<lb/>
that may naturally enough be supposed <del>predominant</del> <add>to have found its way</add> in<lb/>
<add>rather</add> more than a due proportion into a breast circumstanced like<lb/>
mind: that it is a <hi rend="underline">strain</hi> put upon words and such<lb/>
an one as <add>in the present case at least</add> ought not to have been <add>put <del>in the present case: that it that</del> it</add> it is, if not
<hi rend="underline"><foreign>"torguere<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">"leges"</foreign></hi>, <hi rend="underline">torquere voces, "ad hoc et torqucant hominem".</hi></p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 14:00, 25 April 2016

Click Here To Edit

Of Long and Forgery

12 May 1802

Times 27 May 1802. Evidence suppression punished with 6 months imprisonment.

At the very title of this section, I see Your Lordship
start: on the one hand a man high in Office
doing that sort of thing, for which a man deserves a halter by which so many obtain wretches obtain:
or on the other hand a man {hitherto once thought worthy of
being in office, and} hitherto without reproach, saying that
sort of thing for which, if it were false, or at any rate
if he did not believe it to be true, he would deserve the
pillory.

A sad alternative in truth were it the only only: fortunately but happily
there is neither halter nor pillory in this case.

That I accuse Mr Long: now for the Right Honourable
Charles Long of forgery is true enough: but it is not
precisely that sort of thing which has been presented to occurred to your
Your Lordship conception by the letters of which the word forgery
Lordship in the first
is composed. It is not positive forgery that I accuse
him of: it is nothing more than negative: of that sort
of act which, were it not for the warrant which Your Lordship will find me in possession of I possess
I should have contented myself with calling by the fable and
imperfectly expressive compound denomination of suppression
of evidence.

It may appear to Your Lordship that notwithstanding
this explanation the appellation is an unwarrantable
one: that it is the offspring of that sort of passion
that may naturally enough be supposed predominant to have found its way in
rather more than a due proportion into a breast circumstanced like
mind: that it is a strain put upon words and such
an one as in the present case at least ought not to have been put in the present case: that it that it it is, if not "torguere
<hi rend="underline">"leges"
, torquere voces, "ad hoc et torqucant hominem".



Identifier: | JB/120/089/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 120.

Date_1

1802-05-12

Marginal Summary Numbering

1

Box

120

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

089

Info in main headings field

long and forgery

Image

001

Titles

of long and forgery

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

1800

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

[[notes_public::"times 27 may 1802 evidence suppression punished with 6 months imprisonmt" [note in bentham's hand]]]

ID Number

39915

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in