JB/123/106/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/123/106/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
A plan<add>design</add> was produced in the occasion, f<del>or <gap/></del> <note>Qu<lb/>
Leaves out</note><lb/>
to appearance of any old date, projected by the Adams's<lb/>
It was for coversing almost the whole of <add>if not the whole</add><lb/>
the spot with buildings.  The present total absence<lb/>
of value was admitted: but Finsbury<lb/>
Square was mentioned as an example of a value<lb/>
that might be given to such a spot by building<lb/>
The probability of the spot's recovery buildings<lb/>
at some period or other, <add>were known to be received from Parliament</add> can not be disputed<lb/>
unless bounds to the possible spread of the Metropolis<lb/>
could be assigned. But <add>a <gap/> that seems to be indicated</add> that the period at which<lb/>
such an event would have taken place is not likely<lb/>
to be a very near one, near enough to be of much<lb/>
advantage to the existing Members, is that there is<lb/>
so much ground contiguous <add>remaining</add> unbuilt upon, though<lb/>
a great part of it in situations seemingly more<lb/>
advantageous, viz: the banks of the River along<lb/>
 





Revision as of 08:22, 26 September 2019

Click Here To Edit

A plandesign was produced in the occasion, for Qu
Leaves out

to appearance of any old date, projected by the Adams's
It was for coversing almost the whole of if not the whole
the spot with buildings. The present total absence
of value was admitted: but Finsbury
Square was mentioned as an example of a value
that might be given to such a spot by building
The probability of the spot's recovery buildings
at some period or other, were known to be received from Parliament can not be disputed
unless bounds to the possible spread of the Metropolis
could be assigned. But a that seems to be indicated that the period at which
such an event would have taken place is not likely
to be a very near one, near enough to be of much
advantage to the existing Members, is that there is
so much ground contiguous remaining unbuilt upon, though
a great part of it in situations seemingly more
advantageous, viz: the banks of the River along




Identifier: | JB/123/106/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 123.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

123

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

106

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

3

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

41532

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in