JB/073/092/001

Click Here To Edit

NONCON - Crit. Review For 1766. p. 328.176

A writer in one of the reviews falls with great
asperity upon Mr de Voltaire for
palliating seeking (as it seems to him)under in
one of his pieces this to
introducing in the article Amour Socratique
palliate the guilt of this offence This he does in the Grief of Griefs stile without attempting to invalidate the truth of any of these observations which appear to him to be introduced for the sake of it in that design
of a miscellany entitled The Philosophical
Dictionary" observations

I dare answer for that gallant philosopher his physical abhorrence against this filthiness falls short in nothing to that of this Reviewer.

What is curious, the circumstance argument which
Mr de Voltaire assigns as the reason
for his not holding it innocent, the only
circumstance property on from which it's political & consequently
moral guilt can reasonably rationally be
inferred established it's evil influence on
population not without at least an appearance at least of propriety it sollicitous to the Reviewer contests not without forsooth because this, forsooth
plausibility:
at least an appearance of propriety: forsooth, was being the artifice of the Frenchman's
artifice, to throw the opinion of it's guilt
upon a false an untenable foundation, in order to remove
it from the true.

---page break---

2

What distinguishes a real from an imaginary
crime, is precisely this, that with regard
to the 1st all observations that can be introduced
to palliate it, being either false in
point of fact, or inconclusive in point
or reason, admit in general of an easy a ready
and at the worst of a satisfactory reply:
[On this in the case of the latter, even
that persuasion has no other foundation that
prejudice, the setting up a against & the giving full loose to the torrent of invective & exclamation the only of it's support. - men's passions must be
inflamed] Suppose the experiment, for example,
made on Rape or Robbery — are
these crimes to be defended with any danger
of advantage? If I were thoroughly a
man's enemy, I could not wish for
better sport, than to have him set up

The History of such an one is it's severest satyre. the thorough examination of it the most effectual method of [rendering it odious] confirming strengthening the persuasion of its guilt. and the greater is that it's guilt, the less is there occasion for invective heat & exclamation men's judgments need but to be informed.

Identifier: | JB/073/092/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 73.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	073	Main Headings	law in general
Folio number	092	Info in main headings field	noncon. crit. review
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	f1 / f2
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	[[watermarks::[lion with vryheyt motif]]]
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	23932
Box Contents