JB/096/004/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/096/004/002: Difference between revisions

Judieb (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE-->  
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE-->  


<!-- additions in red pen above the line -->
<p><add>And again: &#x2014;  <foreign>"L'homme, come être physique est ainsi<lb/> 'que les autres corps, <unclear>gouvernè</unclear> par des loix <unclear>invariàbles</unclear></foreign>.</add> <del><gap/> <gap/> <gap/> be the <gap/> <gap/></del> <lb/>
<del><gap/></del>, in the same manner as the hand <add>"<foreign>comme être intelligent il viole sans <unclear>cesse</unclear> les loix que</foreign></add><lb/>


<p>And again: &#x2014;  <foreign>"L'homme, come etre physique est ainsi<lb/> 'que les autre corps, <unclear>gouverne</unclear> par des lois invariables.<lb/> <del>deleted text</del> <lb/>"comme etre intelligent il viole sans <unclear>cesse</unclear> les loix que</foreign><lb/><del>deleted text</del>, in the same manner as the hand<lb/> <foreign>"Dieu a etablies."</foreign><lb/> of a watch, is forced to describe a given space<lb/> All this sounded very pretty: &amp; our Author was determined<lb/> in a given time, in consequence of the degree<lb/> to make it <hi rend='underline'>his own</hi>. But as ill luck, or worse oversight<lb/> of moving force, communicated by the<lb/>would have it when he laid his finger on these fine<lb/> maker. St. <del>Francis</del> <hi rend='superscript'>Anthony</hi> preaching to the<lb/> <unclear>hapages</unclear>, he had forgotten Montesquieus definition<lb/> <unclear>fishes</unclear>, would be, to the full as inconsistent,<lb/> of Law: &amp; so did not perceive, that though <unclear>required</unclear><lb/> as respectable, as a legislator prescribing, or <lb/> the same term they were all the while talking of<lb/> a professor explaining, laws to such a <lb/> very different things. <lb/> being as this.  <del>deleted text</del> <unclear>questionable reading</unclear> See Addenda <lb/> We have seen our Author's definition of Law. But <lb/> What must be the feelings of a Young, and <lb/> Laws according to Montesquieu are - <foreign>"les rapports</foreign> <lb/> inquisitive mind, at seeing such a confu= <lb/> <foreign>"qui derivent de la nature des choses."</foreign> &#x2014; how in <lb/> sion of Ideas? at hearing our author <del>deleted text</del> <lb/> these same <foreign>"r<hi rend='underline'>appo</hi>rts</foreign>" the<del>re is</del> ideas of superiority and <lb/> gravely descant on the action of inactive <lb/> inferiority of <unclear>consciousness</unclear> of <hi rend='superscript'>matter</hi> promulgation; <unclear>ac</unclear> are <lb/> not
of a watch, is forced to describe a given space <add><foreign>"Dieu a etablies."</foreign></add><lb/>  
in a given time, in consequence of the degree <add>All this sounded very pretty: &amp; our Author was determined</add><lb/>  
of moving force, communicated by the&#x2014; <add>to make it <hi rend='underline'>his own</hi>. But as ill luck, or worse oversight</add>
<lb/>
 
 
maker. S<hi rend='superscript'>t</hi>. <del>Francis</del> <add>Anthony</add> preaching to the <add>would have it when he laid his finger on these fine</add><lb/>  
<unclear>fishes</unclear>, would be, to the full as inconsistent, <add>passages, he had forgotten Montesquieus definition</add>  <lb/>
as respectable, as a legislator prescribing, or <add>of Law: &amp; so did not perceive, that though <unclear>required</unclear></add><lb/> a professor explaining, laws to such a &#x2014; <add>the same term they were all the while talking of</add><lb/> being as this.<del><add><gap/></add></del> <add>very different things</add><lb/></p>
 
<p> <add>#</add> <note># See Addenda</note>
 
What must be the feelings of a Young, and <add>We have seen our Author's definition of Law. But</add> <lb/>  
 
inquisitive mind, at seeing such a confusion <add>Laws according to Montesquieu are - <foreign>"les rapports</foreign></add><lb/>  
 
of Ideas? at hearing our author <del><gap/></del> <add><foreign>"qui derivent de la nature des choses."</foreign> &#x2014; how in</add><lb/>  
 
gravely descant on the action of inactive <add>matter</add><add>these same <foreign>"r<hi rend='underline'>appo</hi>rts</foreign>" the<del>re is</del> ideas of superiority and</add><lb/>
<add>inferiority of consciousness of promulgation; &amp;c are not</add><lb/>
<head>8</head>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 17:05, 2 February 2011

Click Here To Edit

And again: — "L'homme, come être physique est ainsi
'que les autres corps, gouvernè par des loix invariàbles
.
be the
, in the same manner as the hand "comme être intelligent il viole sans cesse les loix que
of a watch, is forced to describe a given space "Dieu a etablies."
in a given time, in consequence of the degree All this sounded very pretty: & our Author was determined
of moving force, communicated by the— to make it his own. But as ill luck, or worse oversight
maker. St. Francis Anthony preaching to the would have it when he laid his finger on these fine
fishes, would be, to the full as inconsistent, passages, he had forgotten Montesquieus definition
as respectable, as a legislator prescribing, or of Law: & so did not perceive, that though required
a professor explaining, laws to such a — the same term they were all the while talking of
being as this. very different things

# # See Addenda What must be the feelings of a Young, and We have seen our Author's definition of Law. But
inquisitive mind, at seeing such a confusion Laws according to Montesquieu are - "les rapports
of Ideas? at hearing our author "qui derivent de la nature des choses." — how in
gravely descant on the action of inactive matterthese same "rapports" there is ideas of superiority and
inferiority of consciousness of promulgation; &c are not
8

Identifier: | JB/096/004/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

096

Main Headings

comment on the commentaries

Folio number

004

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

Category

collectanea

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c7 / c8 / c9 / c10

Penner

168

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [quartered royal arms motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

[[notes_public::"to be copied" [note not in bentham's hand]]]

ID Number

31008

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in