★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/079/055/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/079/055/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
'' | <!-- This is a single large page divided into two columns and is transcribed left hand column first --> <p> The sum total of the mischief of the influence of want of <note>notriety</note><lb/> <note>non notrirty</note> upon the efficacy of the whole System <add>collection</add> not being brought <lb/> into view <note><add>action</add></note> upon any one of these occasions, but only some small<lb/> part of it, it is only that small aprt that comes to be weighed<lb/>against the whole of the inconvenience apprehended from the <lb/>abrogation of any parcel of the Collection <add>System</add> that happens to be <note><add>assumed a great assembly</add></note><lb/> pitched upon for the purpose.<lb/></p> <p> It is thus that men remote from <add>the</add> secret springs of [political]<lb/> action <del>are</del> may be enabled to account in the most honourable <add>respectful</add><lb/> and probably the truest manner for the conduct [proceeding]<lb/> otherwise scarce applicable of the higher assembly of the Legislature<lb/> in rejecting the advances we have so lately seen made<lb/> for th<del>e</del>at <del><gap/></del> purpose by the lower.<lb/></p> <p> Estimating more highly the utility of one of the Laws proposed<lb/> for abrogatin, (for example that for rendering the attempt<lb/> to murder a privy Councillor more penal than a common<lb/> person, than the other House) <del><gap/></del> <add>it</add> might think <note><add>be of opinion </add></note> in the 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> place<lb/> that the benefit of that one Law either of itself or at least<lb/> added to tht of some other Law or Laws of those comprized<lb/> in the proposal, is, after deducting all the inconvenience<lb/> resulting from thme in point of their matter as well as their<lb/> form, superior to the benefit resulting to the whole System<lb/> merely from the disembarassing of it from so much superfluous<lb/> matter as taken together they contain, that being probably<lb/> the whole benefit broughtinto view upon the occasion.<lb/> </p> <p> And [in this manner therefore] <note><add>thus</add></note> they might be determined<lb/> not to part with that.<lb/></p> <p> Then with respect to the remaining ones, it might think in<lb/> the next place that the above mentioned benefit of <unclear>exterpating</unclear><lb/> them might still yield even to another inconvenience of a different<lb/> nature: viz<lb/></p> <p> Consolid<hi rend='superscript'>n</hi> Partial attempts ineffectual. Why Br <!-- box symbol --> Unsystematicalness cause of Particular views Sans common Principles <!-- Thsi line spans both columns --> </p> <pb/><!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | |||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
The sum total of the mischief of the influence of want of notriety
non notrirty upon the efficacy of the whole System collection not being brought
into view action upon any one of these occasions, but only some small
part of it, it is only that small aprt that comes to be weighed
against the whole of the inconvenience apprehended from the
abrogation of any parcel of the Collection System that happens to be assumed a great assembly
pitched upon for the purpose.
It is thus that men remote from the secret springs of [political]
action are may be enabled to account in the most honourable respectful
and probably the truest manner for the conduct [proceeding]
otherwise scarce applicable of the higher assembly of the Legislature
in rejecting the advances we have so lately seen made
for theat purpose by the lower.
Estimating more highly the utility of one of the Laws proposed
for abrogatin, (for example that for rendering the attempt
to murder a privy Councillor more penal than a common
person, than the other House) it might think be of opinion in the 1st place
that the benefit of that one Law either of itself or at least
added to tht of some other Law or Laws of those comprized
in the proposal, is, after deducting all the inconvenience
resulting from thme in point of their matter as well as their
form, superior to the benefit resulting to the whole System
merely from the disembarassing of it from so much superfluous
matter as taken together they contain, that being probably
the whole benefit broughtinto view upon the occasion.
And [in this manner therefore] thus they might be determined
not to part with that.
Then with respect to the remaining ones, it might think in
the next place that the above mentioned benefit of exterpating
them might still yield even to another inconvenience of a different
nature: viz
Consolidn Partial attempts ineffectual. Why Br Unsystematicalness cause of Particular views Sans common Principles
---page break---
|
Identifier: | JB/079/055/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 79. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
079 |
|||
|
055 |
[[info_in_main_headings_field::composit. consolid[atio]n partial attempts ineffectual - why - unsystematicalness - cause of particular views sans common principles]] |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
copy/fair copy sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]] |
|||
|
25497 |
|||
