JB/106/088/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/106/088/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
<head>1 March 1807</head>  
<head>1 March 1807</head>  


Another circumstance<add>consideration</add><add>+</add> and<add>operates </add> t reduce still further to reduce<add>on reduction</add><lb/>
<p>Another circumstance<add>consideration</add><add>+</add> and<add>operates </add> t reduce still further to reduce<add>on reduction</add><lb/>
the mischief of indecision when the subject of it is the <lb/>
the mischief of indecision when the subject of it is the <lb/>
matter of fact. Where <del>par</del> determinate individuals <add>are concerned</add>, the<lb/>
matter of fact. Where <del>par</del> determinate individuals <add>are concerned</add>, the<lb/>
Line 11: Line 11:
suffering will be produced than by the opposite right one: if,<lb/>
suffering will be produced than by the opposite right one: if,<lb/>
for example, the <del>party in <gap/></del> matter in dispute being<lb/>
for example, the <del>party in <gap/></del> matter in dispute being<lb/>
pe??niary, the party in whose favour the unjust decision is <lb/>
pecuniary, the party in whose favour the unjust decision is <lb/>
pronounced is <del>in a state of indigence  
pronounced is <del>in a state of indigence  
</del> so circumstanced that<lb/>
</del> so circumstanced that<lb/>
the opposite right decision would have reduced him from a state <lb/>
the opposite right decision would have reduced him from a state <lb/>
of accustomed affluence<add>habitual sufficiency</add>
of accustomed affluence<add>habitual sufficiency</add>, to a state of ruin and indigence, which<lb/>
the party to whose prejudice this injustice operates, such is his<lb/>
superiority in point of affluence, would not be materially affected<lb/>
by it.</p>
 
<p>Another example is where either the general sensibility<lb/>
of the <del>party</del> losing party, the party in whom the unjust decision<lb/>
imp??s the burthen of loss, is less acute than that of the winning<lb/>
party who in the opposite case would have suffered a<lb/>
loss to the same amount, or degree of susceptibility being the <lb/>
same in both sides, the <unclear>permission</unclear> or assurance of success<lb/>
was less <unclear>inbuse</unclear> in the wrong side than in the opposite side<lb/></p>
 
<del>These are both of these cases</del> Of neither of these cases can<lb/>
any doubt be in????ned but that it finds itself frequently<lb/>
exemplified in bra???.  But this depending upon<add>all this it is evident depends</add> upon interior<lb/>
psychological circumstances, of
 
 
 
 
 
 


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 18:05, 30 December 2014

Click Here To Edit 1 March 1807

Another circumstanceconsideration+ andoperates t reduce still further to reduceon reduction
the mischief of indecision when the subject of it is the
matter of fact. Where par determinate individuals are concerned, the
parties each with his individual circle of connections, are concerned
it will frequently happen that by one erroneous decision less
suffering will be produced than by the opposite right one: if,
for example, the party in matter in dispute being
pecuniary, the party in whose favour the unjust decision is
pronounced is in a state of indigence so circumstanced that
the opposite right decision would have reduced him from a state
of accustomed affluencehabitual sufficiency, to a state of ruin and indigence, which
the party to whose prejudice this injustice operates, such is his
superiority in point of affluence, would not be materially affected
by it.

Another example is where either the general sensibility
of the party losing party, the party in whom the unjust decision
imp??s the burthen of loss, is less acute than that of the winning
party who in the opposite case would have suffered a
loss to the same amount, or degree of susceptibility being the
same in both sides, the permission or assurance of success
was less inbuse in the wrong side than in the opposite side

These are both of these cases Of neither of these cases can
any doubt be in????ned but that it finds itself frequently
exemplified in bra???. But this depending uponall this it is evident depends upon interior
psychological circumstances, of






Identifier: | JB/106/088/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106.

Date_1

1807-03-01

Marginal Summary Numbering

9-13

Box

106

Main Headings

scotch reform

Folio number

088

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

34676

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in