JB/106/088/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/106/088/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
<head>1 March 1807</head>  
<head>1 March 1807</head>  


<p>Another circumstance<add>consideration</add><add>+</add> and<add>operates </add> to reduce still further to reduce<add>on reduction</add><lb/>
<p>Another circumstance<add>+</add> <add>consideration</add> tends <add>operates </add> to reduce still further to reduce <add>on reduction</add><lb/>
the mischief of indecision when the subject of it is the <lb/>
the mischief of indecision when the subject of it is the <lb/>
matter of fact. Where <del>per</del> determinate individuals alone<add>are concerned</add>, the<lb/>
matter of fact. Where <del>per</del> determinate individuals alone <add>are concerned</add>, the<lb/>
parties each with his individual circle of connections, are concerned<lb/>
parties each with his individual circle of connections, are concerned<lb/>
it will frequently happen that by one erroneous decision less<lb/>
it will frequently happens that by one erroneous decision less<lb/>
suffering will be produced than by the opposite right one: if,<lb/>
suffering will be produced than by the opposite right one: if,<lb/>
for example, the <del>party in <gap/></del> matter in dispute being<lb/>
for example, the <del>party in <gap/></del> matter in dispute being<lb/>
Line 15: Line 15:
</del> so circumstanced that<lb/>
</del> so circumstanced that<lb/>
the opposite right decision would have reduced him from a state <lb/>
the opposite right decision would have reduced him from a state <lb/>
of accustomed affluence<add>habitual sufficiency</add>, to a state of ruin and indigence, which<lb/>
of accustomed affluence <add>habitual sufficiency</add>, to a state of ruin and indigence, which<lb/>
the party to whose prejudice this injustice operates, such is his<lb/>
the party to whose prejudice this injustice operates, such is his<lb/>
superiority in point of affluence, would not be materially affected<lb/>
superiority in point of affluence, would not be materially affected<lb/>
Line 25: Line 25:
party who in the opposite case would have suffered a<lb/>
party who in the opposite case would have suffered a<lb/>
loss to the same amount, or degree of sensibility being the <lb/>
loss to the same amount, or degree of sensibility being the <lb/>
same in both sides, the <unclear>persuasion</unclear> or assurance of success<lb/>
same in both sides, the persuasion or assurance of success<lb/>
was less <unclear>inbuse</unclear> in the <unclear>wrong</unclear> side than in the opposite side<lb/></p>
was less <gap/> in the losing side than in the opposite side</p>


<p><del>These are both of these cases</del> Of neither of these cases can<lb/>
<p><del>These are both of these cases</del> Of neither of these cases can<lb/>
any doubt be entertained but that it finds itself frequently<lb/>
any doubt be entertained but that it finds itself frequently<lb/>
exemplified in practice.  But this depending upon<add>all this it is evident depends</add> interior<lb/>
exemplified in practice.  But this depending upon <add>all this it is evident depends</add> interior<lb/>
psychological circumstances, <del>of</del> <add>concerning</add> which the third person in  the<lb/>
psychological circumstances, <del>of</del> <add>concerning</add> which the third person in  the<lb/>
state of judge can possibly possess any tolerably adequate means<lb/>
state of judge can possibly possess any tolerably adequate means<lb/>
of forming a judgement. Barometers we have <add>Physical quantities afford instruments of measuration: psychological not</add> thermometers we have.<lb/>
of forming a judgement. Barometers we have <add>Physical quantities afford instruments of measuration: psychological, not.</add> thermometers we have.<lb/>
<unclear>pathometer</unclear>, none.  Till an instrument of this sort shall have been invented,<lb/>
<unclear>pathometer</unclear>, none.  Till an instrument of this sort shall have been invented,<lb/>
in the estimation of the judge <del>that the</del> expectation of that one of the <unclear>parties</unclear> must always be deemed the <unclear>stronger</unclear>, who has the better title.</p><pb/>
in the estimation of the judge <del>that the</del> expectation of that one of the parties must always be deemed the stronger, who has the better title.</p><pb/>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 10:28, 3 March 2015

Click Here To Edit 1 March 1807

Another circumstance+ consideration tends operates to reduce still further to reduce on reduction
the mischief of indecision when the subject of it is the
matter of fact. Where per determinate individuals alone are concerned, the
parties each with his individual circle of connections, are concerned
it will frequently happens that by one erroneous decision less
suffering will be produced than by the opposite right one: if,
for example, the party in matter in dispute being
pecuniary, the party in whose favour the unjust decision is
pronounced is in a state of indigence so circumstanced that
the opposite right decision would have reduced him from a state
of accustomed affluence habitual sufficiency, to a state of ruin and indigence, which
the party to whose prejudice this injustice operates, such is his
superiority in point of affluence, would not be materially affected
by it.

Another example is where either the general sensibility
of the party losing party, the party in whom the unjust decision
imposes the burthen of loss, is less acute than that of the winning
party who in the opposite case would have suffered a
loss to the same amount, or degree of sensibility being the
same in both sides, the persuasion or assurance of success
was less in the losing side than in the opposite side

These are both of these cases Of neither of these cases can
any doubt be entertained but that it finds itself frequently
exemplified in practice. But this depending upon all this it is evident depends interior
psychological circumstances, of concerning which the third person in the
state of judge can possibly possess any tolerably adequate means
of forming a judgement. Barometers we have Physical quantities afford instruments of measuration: psychological, not. thermometers we have.
pathometer, none. Till an instrument of this sort shall have been invented,
in the estimation of the judge that the expectation of that one of the parties must always be deemed the stronger, who has the better title.


---page break---



Identifier: | JB/106/088/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106.

Date_1

1807-03-01

Marginal Summary Numbering

9-13

Box

106

Main Headings

scotch reform

Folio number

088

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

34676

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in