★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
11<lb/>1822 July 16<lb/><head>Constitut. Code Rationale</head><note>Supreme Operative<lb/>1 <gap/><lb/><gap/> <gap/> <gap/><lb/><gap/> not error.</note><p>Supreme Operative<lb/>95 or 1. +<lb/>Quantity of misrule givens<lb/>question in what proportion<lb/>the result of <add><gap/></add> sinister<lb/>interest, i.e. of the <hi rend="underline">will</hi>, in<lb/>what the result of <add>intellectual</add><lb/>prejudice <add>inaptitude</add> etc. i. e. of the<lb/><hi rend="underline">judgment</hi>.</p><p>Not <del>unnatural</del> <add>immaterial</add> is the<lb/>answer with a view to<lb/>practice.</p><p>96 or 2. +<lb/>Answer. To sinister interest<lb/>now, whether or not<lb/>originally; <hi rend="underline">preservation</hi>,<lb/>yes: whether or not creation.</p><p>97 or 3. +<lb/>True, for creation and<lb/>preservation of what is<lb/>absurd and mischievous,<lb/>intellectual weakness has<lb/>always existed for absurdity<lb/>even palpably detrimental<lb/>to the interest of the<lb/>entertainers.<lb/>But so has sinister interest.</p><p>98 or 4. +<lb/>Many are the cases in<lb/>which what has to a first<lb/>view appeared the result<lb/>of weakness, has on a<lb/>second been found to<lb/>result from sinister<lb/>interest.</p><p>Generally interest has<lb/>been the cause in the<lb/>minds of the _____ governors;<lb/>weakness in d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> of<lb/>the subject multitude.</p><p>99 or 5. +<lb/>For preserving whatsoever<lb/>is called mischievous or<lb/>absurd, or both, one general<lb/>reason suffices. To<lb/>justify the abolition, you<lb/>must call in reason:<lb/>you must refer to greatest<lb/>happiness principle,<lb/>you must thus <sic>admitt</sic><lb/>the applicability of it.</p> | 11<lb/>1822 July 16<lb/><head>Constitut. Code Rationale</head><note>Supreme Operative<lb/>1 <gap/><lb/><gap/> <gap/> <gap/><lb/><gap/> not error.</note><p>Supreme Operative<lb/>95 or 1. +<lb/>Quantity of misrule givens<lb/>question in what proportion<lb/>the result of <add><gap/></add> sinister<lb/>interest, i.e. of the <hi rend="underline">will</hi>, in<lb/>what the result of <add>intellectual</add><lb/>prejudice <add>inaptitude</add> etc. i. e. of the<lb/><hi rend="underline">judgment</hi>.</p><p>Not <del>unnatural</del> <add>immaterial</add> is the<lb/>answer with a view to<lb/>practice.</p><p>96 or 2. +<lb/>Answer. To sinister interest<lb/>now, whether or not<lb/>originally; <hi rend="underline">preservation</hi>,<lb/>yes: whether or not creation.</p><p>97 or 3. +<lb/>True, for creation and<lb/>preservation of what is<lb/>absurd and mischievous,<lb/>intellectual weakness has<lb/>always existed for absurdity<lb/>even palpably detrimental<lb/>to the interest of the<lb/>entertainers.<lb/>But so has sinister interest.</p><p>98 or 4. +<lb/>Many are the cases in<lb/>which what has to a first<lb/>view appeared the result<lb/>of weakness, has on a<lb/>second been found to<lb/>result from sinister<lb/>interest.</p><p>Generally interest has<lb/>been the cause in the<lb/>minds of the _____ governors;<lb/>weakness in d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> of<lb/>the subject multitude.</p><p>99 or 5. +<lb/>For preserving whatsoever<lb/>is called mischievous or<lb/>absurd, or both, one general<lb/>reason suffices. To<lb/>justify the abolition, you<lb/>must call in reason:<lb/>you must refer to greatest<lb/>happiness principle,<lb/>you must thus <sic>admitt</sic><lb/>the applicability of it.</p><pb/>+ 99 or 5 contin<hi rend="superscript">d</hi>.<lb/>But by homage paid to<lb/>this principle, you put<lb/>a weapon into adversary's<lb/>hands: with it, he<lb/>will make war on your<lb/>whole system: on all the<lb/>mischievous and absurd<lb/>arrangements from whence<lb/>your sinister interest<lb/>derives its profit.<p>100 or 6. +<lb/>By every attempt to take<lb/>it from him you would<lb/>display such inconsistency<lb/>as to render the corruptness<lb/>of your government<lb/>still more manifest.</p><p>101 or 7. +<lb/>Be this the rule for practice.<lb/>By sinister interest<lb/>is produced every<lb/>mischievous arrangement.<lb/>In few if any instances<lb/>will the position be false<lb/>in theory: in none<lb/>pernicious in practice.<lb/>1. Not so, the opposite.<lb/>Assume this, the<lb/>rule, is keep on arguing.<lb/>This you may do for ever,<lb/>and no good be ever<lb/>produced.</p><p>102 or 8. +<lb/>2. Further evil consequence.<lb/>Seeing you <sic>admitt</sic> tho<lb/>can do no otherwise.<lb/>Practical result you<lb/>continue arguing for ever;<lb/>they continue hearing<lb/>for ever: thus the mischief<lb/>continues for ever without<lb/>remedy.</p><p>Had the true cause been<lb/>known to them, they might<lb/>have advanced the<lb/>remedy ag<hi rend="underline"><hi rend="superscript">st</hi></hi> the authors of<lb/>the evil by acting on their<lb/>fears.</p><pb/> | ||
11
1822 July 16
Constitut. Code RationaleSupreme Operative
1
not error.
Supreme Operative
95 or 1. +
Quantity of misrule givens
question in what proportion
the result of sinister
interest, i.e. of the will, in
what the result of intellectual
prejudice inaptitude etc. i. e. of the
judgment.
Not unnatural immaterial is the
answer with a view to
practice.
96 or 2. +
Answer. To sinister interest
now, whether or not
originally; preservation,
yes: whether or not creation.
97 or 3. +
True, for creation and
preservation of what is
absurd and mischievous,
intellectual weakness has
always existed for absurdity
even palpably detrimental
to the interest of the
entertainers.
But so has sinister interest.
98 or 4. +
Many are the cases in
which what has to a first
view appeared the result
of weakness, has on a
second been found to
result from sinister
interest.
Generally interest has
been the cause in the
minds of the _____ governors;
weakness in do of
the subject multitude.
99 or 5. +
For preserving whatsoever
is called mischievous or
absurd, or both, one general
reason suffices. To
justify the abolition, you
must call in reason:
you must refer to greatest
happiness principle,
you must thus admitt
the applicability of it.
---page break---
+ 99 or 5 contind.
But by homage paid to
this principle, you put
a weapon into adversary's
hands: with it, he
will make war on your
whole system: on all the
mischievous and absurd
arrangements from whence
your sinister interest
derives its profit.
100 or 6. +
By every attempt to take
it from him you would
display such inconsistency
as to render the corruptness
of your government
still more manifest.
101 or 7. +
Be this the rule for practice.
By sinister interest
is produced every
mischievous arrangement.
In few if any instances
will the position be false
in theory: in none
pernicious in practice.
1. Not so, the opposite.
Assume this, the
rule, is keep on arguing.
This you may do for ever,
and no good be ever
produced.
102 or 8. +
2. Further evil consequence.
Seeing you admitt tho
can do no otherwise.
Practical result you
continue arguing for ever;
they continue hearing
for ever: thus the mischief
continues for ever without
remedy.
Had the true cause been
known to them, they might
have advanced the
remedy ag<hi rend="superscript">st</hi> the authors of
the evil by acting on their
fears.
---page break---
|
Identifier: | JB/038/133/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 38. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1822-07-16 |
[[marginal_summary_numbering::95 [or] 1 - 108 [or] 14]] |
||
|
038 |
constitutional code rationale |
||
|
133 |
constitut. code rationale |
||
|
001 |
supreme operative |
||
|
marginal summary sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d11 |
||
|
john flowerdew colls |
|||
|
11770 |
|||
