★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/079/114/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/079/114/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
'' | <!-- This page is laid out in two columns --><head>TURNPIKE-OFFICERS.</head><lb/><head>SECT. V.</head><lb/><p> <head>ART. III</head>A Turnpike Officer, within whose view or knowledge<lb/>a carriage shall have been drawn <add>upon the Road</add> by moreBeasts<lb/>than are allowed, willfully <del>omitting</del> <add>neglecting</add> for the space<lb/>of a week <del>after the offence</del> to make seizure, or to<lb/>prosecut each seizure before a Justice, shall forfeit £10. </p><lb/><p> <head>OBSERVATIONS</head>The former prt o this Section of the originl, bearing<lb/>no relation <del><gap/></del> in respect of <hi rend='underline'>person</hi> <del>or of anything </del> <lb/> <del>else <gap/></del> to this that follows it, can have no place<lb/>here: <del>it <gap/> be said</del> <add>will be found</add> in the Section concerning Constables. </p> <p> [Persons ...as do or shall receive Salaries ... <hi rend='underline'>who</hi><lb/> shall nelect ...& O.] The construction here, it must be confessed<lb/>is rather of the mysterious order: add to this that<lb/> "<hi rend='underline'>as</hi>" without "<hi rend='underline'>such</hi>" before it, is not English for "who" on<lb/> this <unclear>ride</unclear> the Kitchen-Door. It mayt be thought, the<lb/>word "such" was omitted by mistake: this indeed will<lb/> remove the vulgarism; but will not serve entirely to<lb/>clearthe Grammar. The antecedent "such" being<lb/> already provided with it's relative "as" put for "who"<lb/> will not <add>properly</add> <sic>admitt</sic> <del>properly</del> of another upon the back of it.</p> <p> It will be curious enough to make the comparison<lb/>of <del>one of </del> thee two Sections: which tho' separated by an<lb/>interval of half the Act, are in truth so intimately</p> <pb/><!-- next section appears to have been a new piece of paper pasted over --><p> <head>66 ff 15.</head> [If any Tollgatherer ... he shall forfeit]<lb/> <del>Women are often stationed to take</del> <lb/> One often sees nobody <add>at a Turnpike</add> to take the Tolls but a <lb/> <note>Sex v. LX, 71</note><hi rend='underline'>Woman</hi>: either therefore this clause is imperfect,<lb/> or the sepcification of the female gender<lb/>in so many others <del>clauses</del>is superfluous. v. ix<lb/>71<p><pb/><!-- end of pasted over section --> <p> of 310. By <!-- remainder of sentence obscured --><lb/>to prosecute for the offence of drawing, with too many <lb/> <hi rend='underline'>Horses</hi>. <del>By the 15th the last <gap/><gap/></del> <add>And now not only <hi rend='underline'>Horses</hi>, but "<hi rend='underline'>Oxen</hi>", & also</add> <lb/> <del> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> of the <gap/><gap/><gap/> is </del> <add> moreover & <foreign>Per ides</foreign> "<hi rend='underline'>Neat Cattle</hi>" come into <gap/> though </add><lb/> <del> what follows <gap/> to <gap/><gap/> those who </del><add> as to taking notice of <gap/> Mules or any other Beasts </add><lb/> <del> after <gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/> to Sect. <gap/> or. </del><lb/> <del> [Sect... Act... New] <gap/> with Beasts in fairs, where they should <gap/> </del> <add> <gap/><gap/> indeed <add>would it be</add> if he were not, since as we </add><lb/> <del> in fairs &<gap/><gap/> </del> <add> shall find by & by, it is none but Horses & Oxen that <lb/> <del>in fairs & <gap/><gap/></del> <lb/>are <del><gap/></del> <add> taken notice of in</add> <del> in </del> the original provisions. </p> <p> By the same section the lastmentioned persons are<lb/>also in virtue of the word "constructed" & what follows<lb/>it, to prosecute such as offend by using their wheels<lb/>at forbidden distances <note><add> <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> ff 7. Or. ff Art... New.</add></note> or by drawing with Beasts<lb/> in a line when they should be in pairs & <foreign>vice versa</foreign>. <<note>add>|| ff 8 & 13. Or. ff... Art.... New</add></note><lb/> of thi <del>to</del> there is not a Syllable in the 15th </p> <p> In neither of them is there a Syllable <del>about</del> to enforce<lb/> the prosecuting for the <add>several</add> offences, of using carriages without<lb/> the justification enjoined <note><add> <!-- symbol --> ff 18.or. ff .. Art ... New </add></note> of <add> fraudulently </add>evading Toll, <note><add> # ff 14.or. ff Art... New </add></note> of using </p><!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | |||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
TURNPIKE-OFFICERS.
SECT. V.
ART. IIIA Turnpike Officer, within whose view or knowledge
a carriage shall have been drawn upon the Road by moreBeasts
than are allowed, willfully omitting neglecting for the space
of a week after the offence to make seizure, or to
prosecut each seizure before a Justice, shall forfeit £10.
OBSERVATIONSThe former prt o this Section of the originl, bearing
no relation in respect of person or of anything
else to this that follows it, can have no place
here: it be said will be found in the Section concerning Constables.
[Persons ...as do or shall receive Salaries ... who
shall nelect ...& O.] The construction here, it must be confessed
is rather of the mysterious order: add to this that
"as" without "such" before it, is not English for "who" on
this ride the Kitchen-Door. It mayt be thought, the
word "such" was omitted by mistake: this indeed will
remove the vulgarism; but will not serve entirely to
clearthe Grammar. The antecedent "such" being
already provided with it's relative "as" put for "who"
will not properly admitt properly of another upon the back of it.
It will be curious enough to make the comparison
of one of thee two Sections: which tho' separated by an
interval of half the Act, are in truth so intimately
---page break---
66 ff 15. [If any Tollgatherer ... he shall forfeit]
Women are often stationed to take
One often sees nobody at a Turnpike to take the Tolls but a
Sex v. LX, 71Woman: either therefore this clause is imperfect,
or the sepcification of the female gender
in so many others clausesis superfluous. v. ix
71
---page break---
of 310. By
to prosecute for the offence of drawing, with too many
Horses. By the 15th the last And now not only Horses, but "Oxen", & also
of the is moreover & Per ides "Neat Cattle" come into though
what follows to those who as to taking notice of Mules or any other Beasts
after to Sect. or.
[Sect... Act... New] with Beasts in fairs, where they should indeed <add>would it be if he were not, since as we </add>
in fairs & shall find by & by, it is none but Horses & Oxen that
in fairs &
are <add> taken notice of in in the original provisions.
By the same section the lastmentioned persons are
also in virtue of the word "constructed" & what follows
it, to prosecute such as offend by using their wheels
at forbidden distances + ff 7. Or. ff Art... New. or by drawing with Beasts
in a line when they should be in pairs & vice versa. <add>|| ff 8 & 13. Or. ff... Art.... New</add>
of thi to there is not a Syllable in the 15th
In neither of them is there a Syllable about to enforce
the prosecuting for the several offences, of using carriages without
the justification enjoined ff 18.or. ff .. Art ... New of fraudulently evading Toll, # ff 14.or. ff Art... New of using
|
Identifier: | JB/079/114/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 79. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
079 |
|||
|
114 |
sect. v turnpike-officers |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] [lion with vryheyt motif]]] |
||
|
25556 |
|||
