JB/035/004/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/035/004/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
JFoxe (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/035/004/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/035/004/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>Trial by Jury &#x2014;<lb/>
the sanctuary of<lb/>
regular that is of<lb/>
<del><add>expensive</add></del> complicated &amp;<lb/>
expensive Justice</p>
 
<p>Lawyers interested<lb/>
in <gap/> of Juries<lb/>
1. because they<lb/>
are always called<lb/>
on them<lb/>
2. because the<lb/>
proceeding is<lb/>
complicated<lb/>
3. because the<lb/>
result is uncertain</p>
 
<head>Libel</head>
 
<p>That <add>a libel is</add> any thing<lb/>
which a man<lb/>
would not like<lb/>
to have said of<lb/>
him</p>
 
<p>That the truth<lb/>
of the imputation<lb/>
<sic>convey'd</sic> by it<lb/>
instead of being<lb/>
a justification,<lb/>
is not so much<lb/>
an extenuation</p>
 
<p>Now we have<lb/>
the <gap/><lb/>
begging of the question<lb/>
<add>which</add> is characteristic<lb/>
of the new reasoning<lb/>
of Blackstone<lb/>
Jurymen or, to be<lb/>
as <gap/> are<lb/>
when the question<lb/>
is whether they are<lb/>
so.</p>
 
<pb/>
 
<head>Causes of its popularity.</head>
 
<p>1. <add>4</add> <gap/> utility<lb/>
2. <add>5</add> Antiquity.
3. <add>2</add> <del>Present</del> <add>Relative</add> utility<lb/>
4 <add>1</add> <del><gap/></del> excellencies<lb/>
5 <add>6.</add> Lawyers intracted<lb/>
<unclear>clogia.</unclear><lb/>
<del>6. Relative utility.</del>
<del>7</del> The only popular Jury<lb/>
of the judic. establishment.<lb/>
7 Its rise to soften capital<lb/>
punishment.</p>
 
<p>I would not<lb/>
have them Judges<lb/>
but masters of<lb/>
the Judges</p>
 
<head>Pennsylvanians</head>
 
<p>Pennsylvanians<lb/>
Will have a Jury<lb/>
&#x2014; Who are they afraid<lb/>
of? what <add>form the</add><lb/>
jaws of what<lb/>
monster is there<lb/>
the Jury to save<lb/>
them? What<lb/>
Judge is there who<lb/>
is not upon his<lb/>
good behaviour.</p>
 
<p>The Committee<lb/>
have killed the<lb/>
Parliament and<lb/>
they are frightened <add>haunted</add><lb/>
out of their costs<lb/>
by these Ghosts.</p>
 
<head>2</head>


<p><del><add>Unless</add></del> There would not<lb/>
be so much as a<lb/>
newspaper in England<lb/>
nor a book<lb/>
of history.<lb/>
Unless inconsistency<lb/>
were added<lb/>
to absurdity</p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 12:36, 5 July 2012

Click Here To Edit

Trial by Jury —
the sanctuary of
regular that is of
expensive complicated &
expensive Justice

Lawyers interested
in of Juries
1. because they
are always called
on them
2. because the
proceeding is
complicated
3. because the
result is uncertain

Libel

That a libel is any thing
which a man
would not like
to have said of
him

That the truth
of the imputation
convey'd by it
instead of being
a justification,
is not so much
an extenuation

Now we have
the
begging of the question
which is characteristic
of the new reasoning
of Blackstone
Jurymen or, to be
as are
when the question
is whether they are
so.


---page break---

Causes of its popularity.

1. 4 utility
2. 5 Antiquity. 3. 2 Present Relative utility
4 1 excellencies
5 6. Lawyers intracted
clogia.
6. Relative utility. 7 The only popular Jury
of the judic. establishment.
7 Its rise to soften capital
punishment.

I would not
have them Judges
but masters of
the Judges

Pennsylvanians

Pennsylvanians
Will have a Jury
— Who are they afraid
of? what form the
jaws of what
monster is there
the Jury to save
them? What
Judge is there who
is not upon his
good behaviour.

The Committee
have killed the
Parliament and
they are frightened haunted
out of their costs
by these Ghosts.

2

Unless There would not
be so much as a
newspaper in England
nor a book
of history.
Unless inconsistency
were added
to absurdity



Identifier: | JB/035/004/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 35.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

035

Main Headings

constitutional code; evidence; procedure code

Folio number

004

Info in main headings field

jury brouillon

Image

001

Titles

Category

rudiments sheet (brouillon)

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l munn [britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

benjamin constant

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

10597

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in