JB/150/568/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/150/568/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 24: Line 24:
<del>S.43 [2][98][</del> <hi rend="underline">Police Fund</hi>] <del>p.20</del> The provision<lb/>
<del>S.43 [2][98][</del> <hi rend="underline">Police Fund</hi>] <del>p.20</del> The provision<lb/>
made by the existing Statute comp?? nothing<lb/>
made by the existing Statute comp?? nothing<lb/>
but Council's  
but Council's Fees, Fees of the Officers of the Court,<lb/>
 
and Stamp Duties on the Law Proceedings: it does<lb/>
not extend to the Sollicitor's Bill, nor to expences<lb/>
of witnesses. It might possible be worth <del>the</del> while<lb/>
for the Board to have <del>for one <gap/> Sollicitor</del><add>for one of their Surveyors</add> in<lb/>
every County or thereabouts a <hi rend="underline">Sollicitor</hi>, who should <lb/>
be rather better paid than the rest, and upon<lb/>
occasion give advice and direction to the rest. <add>The</add><lb/><pb/>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 21:37, 6 February 2015

Click Here To Edit

S.43{1][97] Page[Page 81.(The Judge ...shall assign, to the person undertaking such prosecution) Council....] Assign to the party injured party That
part inWhat follows in the Bill in inverted commas is copied
verbatim from the Statute 23.G.2.c.11.S.3 which
empowers Judges of Assize Misc Prices & Gaol Delivery &c to order prosecutions [+] The expression might have been minded: but to afford a shoot answer against any objection, it was thought as well to copy it as it stands.
in this way for perjurers committed on trials before
themselves. [+] The demand for such a provisionto the effect seems
not to be less in the present can than in that: especially
as the persons whom the Officers of the Board
will have to contend with are persons of the same
stamp as those who come for trial before the Judges
of Gaol Delivery abovementioned. In the attempts
made by the malefactors | against whom the
Bill is levelled, to save themselves from conviction
perjury, of course, will not be st??? at: and if
some such provisionprovision course as this were not whenmade
to which it, it would givebe apt to form itself into a system.

S.43[2][98]Page 82. Further expenses....shall be defray'd..out of the
S.43 [2][98][ Police Fund] p.20 The provision
made by the existing Statute comp?? nothing
but Council's Fees, Fees of the Officers of the Court,
and Stamp Duties on the Law Proceedings: it does
not extend to the Sollicitor's Bill, nor to expences
of witnesses. It might possible be worth the while
for the Board to have for one Sollicitorfor one of their Surveyors in
every County or thereabouts a Sollicitor, who should
be rather better paid than the rest, and upon
occasion give advice and direction to the rest. The

---page break---


Identifier: | JB/150/568/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

97-98

Box

150

Main Headings

police bill

Folio number

568

Info in main headings field

police bill

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d18 / f144

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

g & ep 1794

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

fr3

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1794

Notes public

ID Number

50789

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in