JB/541/615/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/541/615/001: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p><unclear>tine</unclear>: but I have new since I have here at home read<lb/>
<p><unclear>true</unclear>: but I have now since I have been at home read<lb/>


it through and what received to me in the way of<lb/>
it through and what occurred to me in the way of<lb/>


advice was to confine it entirely to the first nine pages<lb/>
advice was to confine it entirely to the first nine pages<lb/>


supposing that it is <hi rend="underline">that</hi> land and no other that will<lb/>
<del>a</del> supposing that it is <hi rend="underline">that</hi> land and no other that will<lb/>


be fined on. The grand effort of all the rest I think<lb/>
be fixed on. The good effort of all the rest I think<lb/>


must have been produced by Dundas &amp; Long having<lb/>
must have been produced by Dundas &amp; Long having<lb/>


read it who knew and will but others knew (if they are<lb/>
read it who knew and will but others know (if they are<lb/>


at all disposed to hear) what strong arguments you have<lb/>
at all disposed to hear) what strong arguments you have<lb/>
Line 25: Line 25:
respecting the <hi rend="underline">measure</hi> by leaving out all arguments about<lb/>
respecting the <hi rend="underline">measure</hi> by leaving out all arguments about<lb/>


the land, trusting that <del>if <gap/> save to say</del> <unclear><sic>henever</sic></unclear> the <gap/><lb/>
the land, trusting that <del>if he were to say</del> however the stile


in which you had them induced to start the arguments in<lb/>
in which you had been induced to state the arguments in<lb/>


favour of that land to the inclusion of any other they could<lb/>
favour of that land to the exclusion of any other they could<lb/>


not but have <unclear><sic>appened</sic></unclear> to him sufficiently strong.<lb/></p>
not but have appeared to him sufficiently strong.<lb/></p>


<p>But if you think it absolutely necessary to suppose they mean<lb/>
<p>But if you think it absolutely necessary to suppose they mean<lb/>
Line 37: Line 37:
to look for other land, <del>and to</del> the printed paper it <gap/><lb/>
to look for other land, <del>and to</del> the printed paper it <gap/><lb/>


seem to afford <gap/> <gap/> in a <gap/> page to convince<lb/>
seem to afford matter enough in a single page to convince<lb/>


where conviction is <gap/>.<lb/></p>
where conviction is possible.<lb/></p>


Do pray come immediately and <add>let</add> the delay be no longer at your <gap/>.
Do pray come immediately and <add>let</add> the delay be no longer at your <gap/>.

Revision as of 22:22, 30 June 2015

Click Here To Edit

true: but I have now since I have been at home read
it through and what occurred to me in the way of
advice was to confine it entirely to the first nine pages
a supposing that it is that land and no other that will
be fixed on. The good effort of all the rest I think
must have been produced by Dundas & Long having
read it who knew and will but others know (if they are
at all disposed to hear) what strong arguments you have
in store. In this case I think I should in reading it so
reduced to Dundas, tell him you have complied with his advice
respecting the measure by leaving out all arguments about
the land, trusting that if he were to say however the stile in which you had been induced to state the arguments in
favour of that land to the exclusion of any other they could
not but have appeared to him sufficiently strong.

But if you think it absolutely necessary to suppose they mean
to look for other land, and to the printed paper it
seem to afford matter enough in a single page to convince
where conviction is possible.

Do pray come immediately and let the delay be no longer at your .



Identifier: | JB/541/615/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 541.

Date_1

1794-10-27

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

541

Main Headings

Folio number

615

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Correspondence

Number of Pages

Recto/Verso

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in