JB/038/199/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/038/199/001: Difference between revisions

Jancopes (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Jancopes (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


1823. June 8 D1<lb/><head>Constitut. Code</head><lb/>(1<lb/><note>Corruption.<lb/>Question Universal<lb/>dislocation why given to<lb/><gap/> -- Topics<lb/>§. 1. Sole <gap/> <gap/> <gap/><lb/><gap/> <gap/> <gap/><lb/>§. 2. &#x2014; Given to all powerful<lb/>as to all <gap/>. 5. 6<lb/>§. 3. Evil is all obviated by<lb/>not <gap/> <del><gap/></del> to it<lb/>locative except as to<lb/>legislature 4<lb/>§. 4 But for this as applied<lb/>to Prime Minister as<lb/>well as Legislature, they<lb/>would corrupt each other<lb/>to a certainty. 2. 3.<lb/>§. 5. Of corruption, prevention<lb/>is as when possible.<lb/>6. G. W. U. 12. 13. 13(a)<lb/>26<lb/>§. 6. All parties <add>on both sides</add> are governed<lb/>by it. 12. 15. 16. 17. 18<lb/>§. 7. Denial of it is <add>almost</add> universal<lb/>but universally mendacious<lb/>19. 20. 21. 22. 24. 25<lb/>§. 8. How to outrun the <del><gap/></del><lb/>denial. 22. 23.<lb/>§. 9. Sole <gap/>, <del><gap/></del><lb/>minimization of its art after<lb/>its Evil effects <gap/>. 28. 29. 32.<lb/>33. 34. 35<lb/>§. 10. Corruption -- its mode.<lb/>1. Intimidation request. 2<lb/>Remuneration subsequent <gap/><lb/><gap/>. 3. Intimidation<lb/>through <gap/> remuneration.<lb/>30. 31.<lb/>§. 11. Evil effects how far<lb/>preventible in a Democracy.<lb/>32. 33. 34. 35. 36<lb/>§. 12. Corruption <gap/> as<lb/>a mixt Monarchy (Eldon) 37.</note>  
1823. June 8 D1<lb/><head>Constitut. Code</head><lb/>(1<lb/><note>Corruption.<lb/>Question Universal<lb/>dislocation why given to<lb/>Constitutive -- Topics<lb/>§. 1. Sole <gap/> <gap/> <gap/><lb/><gap/> <gap/> <gap/><lb/>§. 2. &#x2014; Given to all powerful<lb/>as to all <gap/>. 5. 6<lb/>§. 3. Evil is all obviated by<lb/>not <gap/> <del><gap/></del> to it<lb/>locative except as to<lb/>legislature 4<lb/>§. 4 But for this as applied<lb/>to Prime Minister as<lb/>well as Legislature, they<lb/>would corrupt each other<lb/>to a certainty. 2. 3.<lb/>§. 5. Of corruption, prevention<lb/>is as when possible.<lb/>6. G. W. U. 12. 13. 13(a)<lb/>26<lb/>§. 6. All parties <add>on both sides</add> are governed<lb/>by it. 12. 15. 16. 17. 18<lb/>§. 7. Denial of it is <add>almost</add> universal<lb/>but universally mendacious<lb/>19. 20. 21. 22. 24. 25<lb/>§. 8. How to outrun the <del><gap/></del><lb/>denial. 22. 23.<lb/>§. 9. Sole <gap/>, <del><gap/></del><lb/>minimization of its art after<lb/>its Evil effects <gap/>. 28. 29. 32.<lb/>33. 34. 35<lb/>§. 10. Corruption -- its mode.<lb/>1. Intimidation request. 2<lb/>Remuneration subsequent <gap/><lb/><gap/>. 3. Intimidation<lb/>through <gap/> remuneration.<lb/>30. 31.<lb/>§. 11. Evil effects how far<lb/>preventible in a Democracy.<lb/>32. 33. 34. 35. 36<lb/>§. 12. Corruption <gap/> as<lb/>a mixt Monarchy (Eldon) 37.</note><p>1.<lb/>Question. To Constitutive<lb/>why give dislocative to all<lb/>Offices.</p><p>Answer. Reasons.<lb/>1. Thus <add>Without this</add> alone can the<lb/>security against the prevention<lb/>of sinister interest in all<lb/>departments and all<lb/>functionaries <add>cannot</add> be maximized.<lb/>2. So in each breast the<lb/>assurance of such<lb/>security.<lb/>3. From it, no evils seem<lb/>probable in the instance<lb/>of one department, more<lb/>than in another.</p><p>2.<lb/>True, even without this<lb/>security, distributed as<lb/>are the powers under the<lb/>Constitutive, no great evil<lb/>could be produced otherwise<lb/>than by sinister<lb/>confederacy between<lb/>Legislative Leaders and<lb/><del>Executive</del> <add>Administrative</add> Chief.</p><p>3.<lb/>By this dislocative, as<lb/>applied to Legislative<lb/>and Executive <add>Administrative</add> Chief, is<lb/>divested of all dangerous<lb/>tendency, the<lb/>dislocative power, which it<lb/>was necessary to give<lb/>him over the Ministers<lb/>of all the departments:<lb/>Without the dislocative<lb/>over the Executive <add>Administrative</add> Chief,<lb/>the Legislative could not<lb/>be assured of giving<lb/>execution and effect to<lb/>the will of the Constitutive.</p><pb/>4.<lb/>By keeping out of the<lb/>Constitutive's hands all<lb/>locative power, except as to<lb/>Legislation as to which<lb/>it was indispensable,<lb/>all danger from the all-<lb/>comprehensiveness of<lb/>the dislocation, is excluded.<lb/>From an apt dislocation,<lb/>no sinister profit<lb/>can be derivable,<lb/>except when it is a<lb/>stepping stone to locative.<p>5.<lb/>Nothing more is the<lb/>power thus proposed to<lb/>be given to the whole<lb/>active part of the body<lb/>of the members of the<lb/>community over their<lb/>Agents, than that which<lb/>it would universally be<lb/>thought absurd not to<lb/>give to each individual<lb/>over all his agents,<lb/>in the management of<lb/>his own particular<lb/>concerns.</p><p>6.<lb/>On the ground of passion<lb/>and thoughtlessness, better the<lb/>reason for refusing to an<lb/>individual this power,<lb/>than for d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi>. to the whole<lb/>Constitutive. For corrective<lb/>to his passion and<lb/>thoughtlessness, each<lb/>individual has, in regard to<lb/>this public concern, the<lb/>coolness and attention of<lb/>all others: no such source<lb/>of correction has he in<lb/>regard to his own particular<lb/>concerns.</p><pb/>7.<lb/>Objection. The more<lb/>virtuous and wise, might<lb/>this be at any time<lb/>turned out by a mob.<p>Answer.<lb/>1. Signing the petition is<lb/>not the work of a mob.<lb/>2. Nor yet delivering votes<lb/>which are delivered in<lb/>secret.<lb/>3. Especially, considering<lb/>the interval between<lb/>delivery of petitions, and<lb/>the delivery of the votes.<lb/>4. Mob will not operate<lb/>without adequate inducement.<lb/>5. Where exercise of<lb/>dislocative power in the<lb/>same hands follows not<lb/>upon d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi>. of the dislocative,<lb/>no adequate inducement<lb/>has place, except persuasion<lb/>of the existence of the<lb/>existence of the functionary's<lb/>inaptitude.<lb/><lb/><lb/><lb/>-----<lb/><gap/> <gap/> <gap/><lb/>§: Corruption its <gap/><lb/>§  its mode of operation &#x2014; no<lb/> no corruption.</p><note>In regard to the dislocative<lb/>more is looked for from<lb/>the preventive effect of the<lb/>arrangement than from the<lb/><hi rend="underline">Examinations</hi>: although<lb/>without an <hi rend="underline">expectation</hi> of the<lb/>Examination, the preventive effect<lb/>could not take place. But<lb/>the one <gap/> of the<lb/><gap/> <gap/> would<lb/>be a strong <gap/> or<lb/><gap/> on the part of the<lb/>functionary.</note>





Revision as of 17:22, 5 March 2015

Click Here To Edit

1823. June 8 D1
Constitut. Code
(1
Corruption.
Question Universal
dislocation why given to
Constitutive -- Topics
§. 1. Sole

§. 2. — Given to all powerful
as to all . 5. 6
§. 3. Evil is all obviated by
not to it
locative except as to
legislature 4
§. 4 But for this as applied
to Prime Minister as
well as Legislature, they
would corrupt each other
to a certainty. 2. 3.
§. 5. Of corruption, prevention
is as when possible.
6. G. W. U. 12. 13. 13(a)
26
§. 6. All parties on both sides are governed
by it. 12. 15. 16. 17. 18
§. 7. Denial of it is almost universal
but universally mendacious
19. 20. 21. 22. 24. 25
§. 8. How to outrun the
denial. 22. 23.
§. 9. Sole ,
minimization of its art after
its Evil effects . 28. 29. 32.
33. 34. 35
§. 10. Corruption -- its mode.
1. Intimidation request. 2
Remuneration subsequent
. 3. Intimidation
through remuneration.
30. 31.
§. 11. Evil effects how far
preventible in a Democracy.
32. 33. 34. 35. 36
§. 12. Corruption as
a mixt Monarchy (Eldon) 37.

1.
Question. To Constitutive
why give dislocative to all
Offices.

Answer. Reasons.
1. Thus Without this alone can the
security against the prevention
of sinister interest in all
departments and all
functionaries cannot be maximized.
2. So in each breast the
assurance of such
security.
3. From it, no evils seem
probable in the instance
of one department, more
than in another.

2.
True, even without this
security, distributed as
are the powers under the
Constitutive, no great evil
could be produced otherwise
than by sinister
confederacy between
Legislative Leaders and
Executive Administrative Chief.

3.
By this dislocative, as
applied to Legislative
and Executive Administrative Chief, is
divested of all dangerous
tendency, the
dislocative power, which it
was necessary to give
him over the Ministers
of all the departments:
Without the dislocative
over the Executive Administrative Chief,
the Legislative could not
be assured of giving
execution and effect to
the will of the Constitutive.


---page break---
4.
By keeping out of the
Constitutive's hands all
locative power, except as to
Legislation as to which
it was indispensable,
all danger from the all-
comprehensiveness of
the dislocation, is excluded.
From an apt dislocation,
no sinister profit
can be derivable,
except when it is a
stepping stone to locative.

5.
Nothing more is the
power thus proposed to
be given to the whole
active part of the body
of the members of the
community over their
Agents, than that which
it would universally be
thought absurd not to
give to each individual
over all his agents,
in the management of
his own particular
concerns.

6.
On the ground of passion
and thoughtlessness, better the
reason for refusing to an
individual this power,
than for do. to the whole
Constitutive. For corrective
to his passion and
thoughtlessness, each
individual has, in regard to
this public concern, the
coolness and attention of
all others: no such source
of correction has he in
regard to his own particular
concerns.


---page break---
7.
Objection. The more
virtuous and wise, might
this be at any time
turned out by a mob.

Answer.
1. Signing the petition is
not the work of a mob.
2. Nor yet delivering votes
which are delivered in
secret.
3. Especially, considering
the interval between
delivery of petitions, and
the delivery of the votes.
4. Mob will not operate
without adequate inducement.
5. Where exercise of
dislocative power in the
same hands follows not
upon do. of the dislocative,
no adequate inducement
has place, except persuasion
of the existence of the
existence of the functionary's
inaptitude.



-----

§: Corruption its
§ its mode of operation — no
no corruption.

In regard to the dislocative
more is looked for from
the preventive effect of the
arrangement than from the
Examinations: although
without an expectation of the
Examination, the preventive effect
could not take place. But
the one of the
would
be a strong or
on the part of the
functionary.




Identifier: | JB/038/199/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 38.

Date_1

1823-06-08

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-7

Box

038

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

199

Info in main headings field

constitut. code

Image

001

Titles

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e1

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

11836

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in