JB/150/464/001

Click Here To Edit

6 +Cd Observations
1. Police Revenue Bill

24
A dealer having
two places of trade
distant from each
other ought to pay
double duty - why
ʃ6 [1] [Place of Trade]. p.20. p.25. Another cluster of topics calling for decision
to prevent obviate doubts. That which confines the effect
of the licence to one place is taken from a string the following
of precedents - 25 G.3 40. §.8 — 26 G.2. c.31. §.3. Alehouse Keepers. Pawnbrokers 25 G.3. c.49. §.4
36 Coachmakers — 35 G.3. c.17. §5. Horse dealers -
If the same person has more places of trade than one, while having
the trade of a different neighbourhood, he may be supposed capable of [+]
[+] paying in proportion,
upon the principle here pursued
in the case of Costs.
See Note [13].

25
A dealer having
two places of trade
almost contiguous,
ought not to pay
double duty - why
§6. [2] [One hundred Yards] - p. 20 A qu random quantity put
by way of example. I would Several instances
have fallen under my observation of where a Tradesman
for want of room in one shop or warehouse has had another
on the opposite side of the Street. A precedent of the In this case, the reason
multiplication of the quantity of intervening space that shall
for the multiplicati above given for the multiplication repetition of the license
not destroy the unity of a place, occurs in the
duty, viz: the having the benefit of different neighbourhoods, and
<add>thence of different sets of customers, does not hold good. Two
provider keeping all Warehouses at a distance from
one another are not more convenient, but less convenient, than
a single one capable of holding the same quantity of goods.

26
Partnership,
a case requiring
to be provided
for
§.6 [3] (partners) p. 20. The case of Partners presented
itself on reflection. It has been provided for in some itself on reflection as a case in which, if the requisite exception
were not used the letter of the law would run counter to the fact
Provision has accordingly been made for it in some of the
late precedents: viz: 25 G.3. c.48. §.8. Pawnbrokers.
35 G.3. c.17. §.5, abovementioned, Coachmakers. 35
G.3. c.17. §5, abovementioned — Horse-dealers. 37
G.3. c.108. §.29. Watchmakers.

ʃ.6 [4] [A separate Recognizance]. p.25 The recognizances being intended
as a standing memento or warning to each individual,
to put him upon his guard against falling into
transgressions which acts of delinquency, such as in some instances might come
to be committed by one Partner without the participation
of the rest, it seemed advisable that each
individual should be in possession of have this warning
constantly in his possession: and the Recognizance
being exempt from Stamp Duty (as per §.1. of this
Bill) and the Recognizance fee so low as a shilling,
the additional of burthen to the expense would be inconsiderable
The use and effect of Partnership being to increase the
quantity of capital, the quantum of the duty payable
might perhaps bear some increase: but as the precedents run [+]
[+] run the other way,
it seems hardly
worth while to depart
from them in pursuit
of an addition,
which can at the utmost
be but trifling,
to the .

Identifier: | JB/150/464/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering	24-26
Box	150	Main Headings	police bill
Folio number	464	Info in main headings field	police revenue bill
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	b6 / f36
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer
Corrections	jeremy bentham	Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	50685
Box Contents